• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Low end torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mi66Ztang
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2004
M

Mi66Ztang

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
3
0
0
Jul 6, 2004
#1
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #1
I am new to the Mustang world, I just bought a 66 289 coupe. Put a 2.5" dual flowmaster 40 series exhaust on w/ hooker super competition headers, sounds great and added some HP. But what can I do to get more Low end torque for the start? I tried to peel out the other day to get a picture or two of a smoke show and I couldnt even do that...Odd, but its not surprising for a car thats as old as my father So if anybody has any suggestions on the Low end torque, or has anything for sale that would help, let me know.

-Smitty
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Jul 6, 2004
#2
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #2
Is this an auto or manua and how did you try to do a burnoutl? This is no reason what so ever why a bone stock 289 shouldn't light them up. I have a 92 honda accord that I can do mad burnouts in (so bad once that tire smoke came in through the air vents). Anyways, to answer your question, the best way I know of to get low end torque at the wheels is gears. After I got my 4.11's I had no problem spinning my tires in 1st or 2nd or 3rd.........or a little in 4th.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 6, 2004
#3
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #3
Welcome to the Stang world!
Some things to consider with SBFs (small block Fords 221-302)...
They are not known for making gobs of torque due to there small size.
They do not follow many of the same rules that you read in mags about torque production and parts recommendations... those are geared to brand X engines with about 350 cubic inches.
The stroke is very short on SBFs... therefore the engine revs easier, makes less torque, and withstands high rpms better than brand X.
In short: Don't expect alot of torque from your 289, rather build it with razor sharp throttle response so the revs rise quickly and burn your tires at higher rpm.
You tell us very little about your combo, this would help some, but those are the 101 basics of SBFs.
Dave
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Jul 6, 2004
#4
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #4
ratio411 is very correct in what he said, but there are things that can be done to improve the torque of a small block, such as choosing the right cam, stroking the motor, getting better heads, and perhaps a different intake. Without more details on your engine, it is difficult to make any real observations or recommendations. I will say you've already made a good choice with the headers and exhaust, but the 2.5" pipe is probably a bit much for a mild 289... 2" or 2.25" would probably have provided more torque.

Post more details on the engine (is it original? stock? rebuilt? 2V or 4V? etc...) and you'll get more useful replies.
 
B

bsedwebt70-5.0

New Member
Jul 1, 2004
320
0
0
Charlottesville, VA
Jul 6, 2004
#5
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #5
edelbrock performer dual plane intake, free flowing air cleaner & turn your factory air cleaner lid upside down, 600cfm 4v carb, tuneup, pertronix ignitor II, 3.50-3.75 gear, advance timing til it pings under load then back off a small bit, 93 octane fuel////that will wake it up.... try the free stuff first - timing advance, good fuel, then move up to the other stuff as your budget allows.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Jul 6, 2004
#6
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #6
Gears are conciderd the most bang for the buck, and I can testify to this. I did go somewhat extreme, but the idea still follows. Like raito411 said, the sbf doesn't make a lot of low end, and is more of a higher rpm motor. This makes it a great motor for gears. However, remember that mustangs are light cars, so going too extreme and all you'll get is a dumptruck.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 6, 2004
#7
  • Jul 6, 2004
  • #7
Tell us more about your car and it's mods...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
708
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
655
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
V
pushrod 5.0 (MILD/ Torque) turbo build for an old scout II help
  • vz58
  • Apr 21, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jan 21, 2026
Flyboy60
F
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?