• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

MAC CAI Installed on 98 GT Love it!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter sasscuba
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2004

sasscuba

Member
Dec 24, 2003
304
0
16
Tulsa Oklahoma
Jan 16, 2004
#1
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #1
Cannot see why alot of people hate the MAC Cold air intake. Just installed mine on my 98 GT and felt the difference immediately! Better throttle response and it does seem a little quicker. Also have Borla exhaust and it made it quite a bit louder. Jusy my 2 cents but I like this product and would recommend it.
 

KJ Hoppus

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,008
0
0
Elk Grove CA
Jan 16, 2004
#2
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #2
stangscuba98a said:
Cannot see why alot of people hate the MAC Cold air intake. Just installed mine on my 98 GT and felt the difference immediately! Better throttle response and it does seem a little quicker. Also have Borla exhaust and it made it quite a bit louder. Jusy my 2 cents but I like this product and would recommend it.
Click to expand...


i feel the same way about mine. just nobody agrees with me
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Jan 16, 2004
#3
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #3
I don't have a problem recommending them either. The throttle response if good enough for me. Dyno numbers are not supportive but it has to be better than stock.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jan 16, 2004
#4
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #4
Has anyone personally dynoed their car, put on a CAI and then redynoed? We should really have some kind of archive to store dyno sheets on different mods.
 

COramprat

...I can take it. I think.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
8,474
1,463
223
Sea of Tranquility
Jan 16, 2004
#5
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #5
FallenPhoenix said:
Has anyone personally dynoed their car, put on a CAI and then redynoed? We should really have some kind of archive to store dyno sheets on different mods.
Click to expand...
It's been done and most say it had no benefit. The MAC styles in particular because they heat up so much that it outways any gains from drawing air from the fender. I took off the piece from the MAF to the TB and put the old stock piece back on. All in all I think air from the fender is better than drawing from the engine comp.
 

sasscuba

Member
Dec 24, 2003
304
0
16
Tulsa Oklahoma
Jan 17, 2004
#6
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #6
bump

bump
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jan 17, 2004
#7
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #7
when my 98 just had pullies and flows....

i lost 3 ft-lbs down low and gained 2rwhp up top...
but for most of the power curve it was a touch lower

so i took it out
 

FastRedPonyCar

Founding Member
Apr 7, 2002
1,678
4
39
I pee sitting down...or do I?
Jan 17, 2004
#8
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #8
CAI's are a waste UNLESS you do something else when you put the CAI on. MAF MAF MAF. The intake cannot be any more effective unless you put a larger mass air meter on it. I made a homeade denscharger and left the stock MAF on for a while. It went from TB to inside fender. Then I got a C&L 80mm maf for cheap at a swap meet and put that on and the difference was night and day. Just out of curiosity, we put it on my roomate's old 96 GT with essentially the same mods as me only with the stock air tube and the difference was not as noticable. (yes we let the computer reset then gave it learning time also)

So for those of you who have pre 02 GT's do yourself a favor if you haven't already done so and get an aftermarket maf to complete the CAI and you will not be dissapointed and the difference in power will be awesome. The power will be increased through the entire band not just at the tippy top. And if you really want to complete the job, buy a new intake plenum like the C&L or Dragon with a 75mm TB and everything will be nice and happy
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jan 17, 2004
#9
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #9
what about the '03 and '04?
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Jan 17, 2004
#10
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #10
MAF=Crap on a stock or near stock car, it will do nothing maybe 2-3HP max. The whole point of a CAI is for the air that the car takes in to be colder and in bigger quanities. So putting a CAI on a dyno is pointless, now put it on the track or freeway @ a high speed and that is where it is supposed to help you, not sitting still in some garage on a dyno.
 
M

medik13

Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
312
0
16
FL
Jan 17, 2004
#11
  • Jan 17, 2004
  • #11
984.6gt said:
MAF=Crap on a stock or near stock car, it will do nothing maybe 2-3HP max. The whole point of a CAI is for the air that the car takes in to be colder and in bigger quanities. So putting a CAI on a dyno is pointless, now put it on the track or freeway @ a high speed and that is where it is supposed to help you, not sitting still in some garage on a dyno.
Click to expand...

I agree and disagree.

I agree with you that MAF's are not needed on a stock car.
However, they are worth more than 2-3RWHP by causing the computer to lean out the A/F ratio. However, since you are not pegging the stock MAF N/A, there is no need for an aftermarket. The same effect can be acheived by dyno tuning your car. That way, you will maximize the A/F ratio across the cuvre as well as other things!!!

The MAC CAI is one of the worse designed ones. The 90*bend in front of the MAF, throws it off, and the chrome pipe gets real hot! A better alternative is the FIPK. Alternate between them and you'll see!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
340
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?