This the same track you run mid-12's in with the same engine combo I have, with a car that weighs 400+ lbs more?Killercanary said:There are mach's going LOW 13's at 105+mph at our track which has an elevation of 1250' BONE STOCK. I do agree that driver skill has a lot to do with it.
facts.....95snoozer said:wow, so many retarded comments in 1 post
Green 94 5.0 said:facts.....
1. every stock 03/04 cobra that i have seen or read about made in the 360-380whp range (20-40 less than 400 in case you have trouble with basic math)
2. a 94-00 integra gsr runs a 15.6 stock
3. a 94-95 stock automatic mustang gt is a mid 15 second car at best
4. a 1.8L 4 cylinder has less than half the displacement and exactly half the cylinders of a 5.0L v8
please enlighten me as to which comments were "retarded" because it seems to me that everything i said was the truth.
1. you called 380 a freak... thast not a freak at all. thast normal form every car my friends have bought. 370s-380s after "the cat recall"Green 94 5.0 said:facts.....
1. every stock 03/04 cobra that i have seen or read about made in the 360-380whp range (20-40 less than 400 in case you have trouble with basic math)
2. a 94-00 integra gsr runs a 15.6 stock
3. a 94-95 stock automatic mustang gt is a mid 15 second car at best
4. a 1.8L 4 cylinder has less than half the displacement and exactly half the cylinders of a 5.0L v8
please enlighten me as to which comments were "retarded" because it seems to me that everything i said was the truth.
Green 94 5.0 said:congratulations. the tailwind must have been killer.....
It is still the point. When you run the car, you run what the car is, not what the differences are. So if you run a 12.9, you say - "Damn, that low compression and big weight difference really killed my time." No, you run what you brung. So you won't race another car because you have truck heads and they don't, so your at a disadvantage? Although I would never own a foreign car of any kind, I do see that the foreign car makers are making cars that will out run a semi stock American V-8, and yes, that is with less than half the displacement and 4 less cylinders.95snoozer said:3. you bash the times of a car with a 800-1300 pound weight difference, LOWER compression and truck heads when you try to make your case of it being sad they could barely edge out a car with 4 less cylinders
1. 380 is not the norm. most are in the 355-365 whp range. go here and have a look. http://www.mustangsvtcobra.com/database/95snoozer said:1. you called 380 a freak... thast not a freak at all. thast normal form every car my friends have bought. 370s-380s after "the cat recall"
2. not many poeple can launch fwd 1wd open diff very well, and wont run that
3. you bash the times of a car with a 800-1300 pound weight difference, LOWER compression and truck heads when you try to make your case of it being sad they could barely edge out a car with 4 less cylinders
common physics
you sound like a ricer when you make that comment.
what are you gonna say next? "technology is replacement for displacement" ?
Joes95GT said:It is still the point. When you run the car, you run what the car is, not what the differences are. So if you run a 12.9, you say - "Damn, that low compression and big weight difference really killed my time."
Joe
Green 94 5.0 said:you are hilarious. you make it sound like i personally bashed you with what i said about a stock mustangs 1/4 mile time. you should really get out more often if general comments about a car made by a stranger on the internet upset you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?