Magnaflow vs MAC Catback

M

Mach 10

New Member

Nov 22, 2004

3

0

2

Mountain Home, Idaho

Feb 20, 2007

#1

• Feb 20, 2007

• #1

I currently have a MAC Catback on my 90 GT and I've never really liked it, it's too loud and just doesn't sound right.

My cars a sleeper, but the MAC exhaust gives it away.

I'm thinking about going to the Magnaflow catback system, I have one on my MACH and like it.

So here's my question is the Magnaflow going to be noticeably quieter than the MAC catback?

 

M

Mach 10

New Member

Nov 22, 2004

3

0

2

Mountain Home, Idaho

Feb 20, 2007

#2

• Feb 20, 2007

• #2

oops

 

91ghp5.0

Active Member

May 25, 2005

42

0

28

Somewhere

Feb 20, 2007

#3

• Feb 20, 2007

• #3

I asked about this recently, and the general consensus is that the Magnaflow is quieter at idle and below 2k-ish, but after that it screams.

 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member

Nov 10, 2004

1,351

59

68

Maryland

Feb 20, 2007

#4

• Feb 20, 2007

• #4

91ghp5.0 pretty much summed it up and you will also get some more ponies from the magnaflow catback

 

Flavadave4

Active Member

Nov 28, 2003

1,044

21

49

Utica, NY

Feb 20, 2007

#5

• Feb 20, 2007

• #5

Yeah.....what he said!

 

M

Mach 10

New Member

Nov 22, 2004

3

0

2

Mountain Home, Idaho

Feb 20, 2007

#6

• Feb 20, 2007

• #6

Thanks I'll be getting the Magnaflows once I get back to the States in June.

I was having trouble passing the new inspection regulations here in Germany, I failed the first time for the car being too loud, I did the old steelwool in the tailpipes to quiet it down, and they still failed it (barely out of limits this time)...so I talked to their boss and told him I was leaving Germany in 3 months anyway, and they passed me.

It also helped that thier boss use to owe a supercharged 347 stroker Fox Body

 

LB0193

Member

Dec 6, 2005

171

0

16

IL

Feb 20, 2007

#7

• Feb 20, 2007

• #7

I hate magnaflow go flowmaster