• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Manually shifting an auto

  • Thread starter Thread starter sage2k
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2005
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 21, 2005
#1
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #1
I know the auto's in the 94-95 suck...anyways it shifts at 5200 on its own but it still has good power so i manually shifted a couple times up to 5600ish maybe more and it felt pretty good

now i know revving in neutral and shifting to drive is bad for the tranny

but is manually shifting from 1 > 2 > D
bad for the transmission?
 

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jun 21, 2005
#2
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #2
No not really. If I were you though I would start saving up cash for a high stall converter and a shift kit... or maybe even for a manual. Until then I say have fun with it.
 
S

sage2k

Member
May 23, 2005
645
0
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Jun 21, 2005
#3
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #3
well right now im working on making it a good daily driver
bout to drop 660$ on air conditioner installed, just bought a 950$ top installed (vert), etc
will be at least a year or 2 before i can afford shift kit =\
but thats prolly next performance thing i do for htis car
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Jun 21, 2005
#4
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #4
It's not good for the tranny.
 

HGFireHazard

Member
Apr 10, 2005
460
0
17
Michigan
Jun 21, 2005
#5
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #5
If it's going to be a couple of years of this transmission for sure I would take it easy then. We all know what too much fun causes parts to do after so long...
 

LukeDaddy

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
82
0
0
Jun 21, 2005
#6
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #6
WhiteStallionGT said:
It's not good for the tranny.
Click to expand...


Explain this statement a little better... its holding the gear longer than letting the ECU control the shift points... it shouldnt cause any more wear and tear on the transmission that allowing the computer to control the shifts...
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Jun 22, 2005
#7
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #7
LukeDaddy said:
Explain this statement a little better... its holding the gear longer than letting the ECU control the shift points... it shouldnt cause any more wear and tear on the transmission that allowing the computer to control the shifts...
Click to expand...
i dont remember exactlky why but it has something to do with the fact that when you have your car in drive and you shift from first to second, it somehow is in a different mode than when you do this manually from 1-2, its not as simple as just taking a shifter and putting it from one gear to the other in a standard... it is much more complex and the auto has to deal with valves letting line pressure change routes, etc... i wish i remembered exactly. all i know is that i had the same question... was told exactly why its not good, and still do it anyway. if something breaks it just gives me a good excuse to do the manual swap... but without a new manual valve body its no good.. as for the 4r70w trannys, its ok, and i hear the aod's take it better too...they're built differently
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jun 22, 2005
#8
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #8
I think that stuff about manually shifting an auto being bad is a myth. It's not gonna do anything to abnormally wear or stress the tranny. Driving like an idiot all the time will. Overheating the tranny will. But I can't imagine how moving the shifter from 1 to 2 will do anything bad.

Of course the whole exercise seems kinda pointless to me. If you leave it in 1, the car will still shift out to 2 before redline right? So why not just put it in 1 and leave it there for acceleration? Or more to the point, if you wanna control your transmission, get a stick. Otherwise, just recognize what you got, a slush box. They can be fun to, and (obviously) can be modded to go really fast.

That's my 2 cents. But I'd be happy to hear a technical reason why playing with the shifter is not a good idea.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 22, 2005
#9
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #9
Not sure if it is what someone is thinking of, but doing a 1-D-1 shuffle is hard since the OD band is used in that shuffle.
 

LukeDaddy

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
82
0
0
Jun 22, 2005
#10
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #10
droptopford 5 0 said:
i dont remember exactlky why but it has something to do with the fact that when you have your car in drive and you shift from first to second, it somehow is in a different mode than when you do this manually from 1-2, its not as simple as just taking a shifter and putting it from one gear to the other in a standard... it is much more complex and the auto has to deal with valves letting line pressure change routes, etc... i wish i remembered exactly. all i know is that i had the same question... was told exactly why its not good, and still do it anyway. if something breaks it just gives me a good excuse to do the manual swap... but without a new manual valve body its no good.. as for the 4r70w trannys, its ok, and i hear the aod's take it better too...they're built differently
Click to expand...

That is understood, but it IS as simple as letting the computer shift the gears... the internals of the transmission dont know whether or not the ECU is controlling the shift points, its all in your head.

The line pressures, and bleeds, and loads on the clutches dont change.. they are based on engine RPM, vehicle speed, and load on the motor.. they arent based on if the shifter is in your hand, or the ecu....


Luke
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Jun 22, 2005
#11
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #11
Suggest: Get a shift kit.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Jun 22, 2005
#12
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #12
Do not suggest: Drink Draino
 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jun 22, 2005
#13
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #13
It's not good on the older aode trannys. The valve bodys have been updated sence 94-95 and the newer valve bodys 96+ can handle it.

You can upgrade some of your tranny parts and do a shift kit/j-mod for $50. www.tccoa.com tech then tranny.
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Jun 22, 2005
#14
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #14
bjl95mustang said:
It's not good on the older aode trannys. The valve bodys have been updated sence 94-95 and the newer valve bodys 96+ can handle it.

You can upgrade some of your tranny parts and do a shift kit/j-mod for $50. www.tccoa.com tech then tranny.
Click to expand...
http://www.tccoa.com/articles/transmission/page1.shtml if you take the time to read this, you will see why it's not good, this guy knows his stuff and i didnt just make up what i said earlier...i just dont understand all of this aas much as i should to paraphrase it in my earlier explanation... let me remind you that with a shift kit/ manual valve body it's fine, just the stock form that sucks for manually shifting the auto
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Jun 22, 2005
#15
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #15
droptopford 5 0 said:
http://www.tccoa.com/articles/transmission/page1.shtml if you take the time to read this, you will see why it's not good, this guy knows his stuff and i didnt just make up what i said earlier...i just dont understand all of this aas much as i should to paraphrase it in my earlier explanation... let me remind you that with a shift kit/ manual valve body it's fine, just the stock form that sucks for manually shifting the auto
Click to expand...
page isn't working and thats too bad cuz i'm real curious about this. i personally see no excessive wear taking place, although i do not know the aode trans specifically. there are alot of vehicles now that have a manual shifting automatic available--see porshe tiptronic. on the other side i really don't see the benefits of this practice either, some track testing on this would be great, so you auto guy(s) get off your duff and hit the strip.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 22, 2005
#16
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #16
SMT's and all the other clutchless trannies (of the several different types) are very different compared to a stock AODE, IMHO.

Jerry's articles (et al) are TOP NOTCH. It is worth waiting till the page will load to read it (it took me several gulps to try and even digest some of the info - I am slow and we all know that. ).
 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jun 22, 2005
#17
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #17
bimmertech said:
page isn't working and thats too bad cuz i'm real curious about this. i personally see no excessive wear taking place, although i do not know the aode trans specifically. there are alot of vehicles now that have a manual shifting automatic available--see porshe tiptronic. on the other side i really don't see the benefits of this practice either, some track testing on this would be great, so you auto guy(s) get off your duff and hit the strip.
Click to expand...

I think you need flash or some other browser add on to view the pages.

It's really just the 94-95 valve bodys that need to be modded. From what i remember the insides of the valve body need to be worked a lil bit and some of the springs and plungers need to be replaced. I have a 99+ valve body in mine and i'm going to use it in my aode/4r70w thats going behind my 418. I'm using racing clutches ect.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Jun 22, 2005
#18
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #18
tiptronic uses a torque converter while maintaining a planetary gearset, bmw steptronic uses torque converter and a planetary gearset. ferrari f1 and bmw smg use a clutch and conventional manual trans gearsets. having been very deep into a steptronic trans and a 4l60e i see very few differences other than a few more solenoids in the valve body, both made by gm powertrain division. either way i look at it this way, does a tranny with a manual valve body have increased wear and decreased life span?
 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jun 22, 2005
#19
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #19
From the tccoa site

Well, the answer it depends. An any 1996 and newer 4r70w, you can do all the manual 1-2 and 2-1 shifts you want and not hurt anything. If it were older than 1996, I'd shy away from manual 1-2's unless you've modified the main control. I would stay away from excessive manual 4-2's on all tranny's older than 1998. in 1998 the manual valve changed to allow the direct clutch to exhaust faster, resulting in less wear.

This came from a ford engineer who did the 4r70w.
 
T

titaniumsc03

Member
Jun 6, 2005
42
0
7
ohio
Jun 23, 2005
#20
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #20
my stangs a 5 spd, but i have a auto camaro with around 400 horse and i only manually shift a trans with 100+ thousand on it, and not a problem, but its not a computer controled od trans, its a turbo 350, but my point is i drive it hard and havnt had a problem, also my buddy had a SC that he manually shifted all the time without a problem, with around 150000 on it,
just my 2 cents
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Apr 23, 2026
CAMTWO1070
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
538
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
C
Drivetrain T-5 transmission issue
  • Ch3No2
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
345
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2025
2000xp8
B
More Issues With New Edge
  • Blackout67
  • May 3, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
709
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2025
Blackout67
B
P
C4 transmission shifting issues
  • Porter07
  • Aug 17, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 1, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?