• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Measuring compression ratio, and rear end gearing... questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter SadbutTrue
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2004

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jun 14, 2004
#1
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #1
Another thread of mine with more than one topic at once that are completely unrelated...

First, will you feel a difference, either in gas mileage or seat of pants, between 3.25 and 3.50 (ish on both) gears? Trying to decide...

Second, to measure compression ratio, do you simply take the ratio of volumes of the displacement of one cylinder (plus the compression ratio, i guess) to the volume of the combustion chamber? Seems like that would make sense, but only if the piston comes all the way up to combustion chamber,which i'm not sure is the case.

Thanks for words on both.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Jun 14, 2004
#2
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #2
If you do feel a difference between 3.25 to 3.50 then it won't be a big one. The raito change there isn't that much. I think you had the right idea going on the CR messurement(didn't really follow what you said too well). You messure CR by taking the total cylinder volume at BDC (inclunding the combustion chamber) to volume of your combustion chamber.
 

kslushy

Founding Member
Jan 25, 2002
1,125
0
37
Jun 14, 2004
#3
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #3
SadbutTrue: You're on the right track. Normally, the piston will not come all the way up to the deck of the block, but will be "submerged" a bit, usually a fraction of an inch. You need this volume, as well as the volume that the head gasket adds in addition to the "cylinder" volume that you can easily imagine, to find the compression ratio. A dished/valve relief and domed pison will therefore lessen or raise the CR depending on which your pisons have, if you're not using flat tops. Depending on how accurate you want to get, you might also want to figure in the top piston ring land height into the equation.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jun 15, 2004
#4
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #4
hrmm...i wouldn't imagine it would be easy to find out what pistons i have in my car... so... whats a stock 69 351w's compression?
 

kslushy

Founding Member
Jan 25, 2002
1,125
0
37
Jun 15, 2004
#5
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #5
did you try google?

otherwise, this site has a lot of great info. direct link to ford compression ratios:

http://mustangii.com/headswapcompression.asp
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jun 15, 2004
#6
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #6
nice link, you wouldn't happen to have another site up your sleeve that says how to tell a 69-72 head from a 73+ one would ya? I assume theres a way with codes on the head, but I have no clue what most of those mean. The engine I bought was from a engine rebuild shop taht supposedly builds engines back to stock specs... but the engine I bought wasa "69-74" type.
 

kslushy

Founding Member
Jan 25, 2002
1,125
0
37
Jun 15, 2004
#7
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #7
It should be the standard "C=1960's, D=1970's, and the following number= the year in the decade" type decoding.


Does that answer your question? If the engine is still in the car, then pulling the valve cover sometimes shows the year of the engine, ie 71 or something between two of the middleish pushrod holes. Otherwise, the stamping is usually on the underside of the head.

What kind of rockers does it have?
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Jun 15, 2004
#8
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #8
look here for additional info:

http://www.network54.com/Forum/119417
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jun 15, 2004
#9
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #9
If I am not mistaken, the 69 351w was 9.5:1 for the 2v models and 11:1 for the 4v models.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
S
1997 4.6 Sohc Compression Ratio?
  • sam burton
  • Nov 10, 2015
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
2K
The Welcome Wagon Nov 24, 2015
madspeed
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?