• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Might trade my 4.6 for a 347 Stroker...

  • Thread starter Thread starter crashGTR1
  • Start date Start date Mar 19, 2004
C

crashGTR1

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
128
0
0
Chicago
Mar 19, 2004
#1
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #1
Details here:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=439940

What do you guys (and girls) think? I think that car's a beast and it might be easier for me financially, and a better car to learn about mods, etc, since it's a 5.0 and a bit easier. Plus, it's got a nice little sleeper look. Opinions please. Thank you.
--Adam
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Mar 19, 2004
#2
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #2
if its not a sportsman block I wouldnt do it , because it sounds to me like its at the point where any strain would crack the block since the stock blocks are notorious for that , I wouldnt do it , do a headswap on your car and KB or spray and you will be far better off .
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Mar 19, 2004
#3
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #3
400rwhp is ok on a stock block...its all in the tune...

500 is the normal limit on a 5.0 block...we had a car(now sold) that had 550rw for over 2 years on a stock block but was tuned correctly
 
X

Xanax

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
103
0
0
Mar 19, 2004
#4
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #4
2002BLGT said:
if its not a sportsman block I wouldnt do it , because it sounds to me like its at the point where any strain would crack the block since the stock blocks are notorious for that , I wouldnt do it , do a headswap on your car and KB or spray and you will be far better off .
Click to expand...
Crash please don't listen to 2002BLGT because he's a
crackhead that doesn't know 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me' about 5.0's! Crash I think the
94 GT your looking at has a great set up I must say! The Keith
Black 347 Hyperetic pistons are strong pistons that will take the
abuse.The Typhoon Intake is a great match with the AirFlow
Research 165 aluminum heads you will get good numbers with
this set up.I say if your not going to do a IP headswap sell your
98 GT and get the 94GT.
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Mar 19, 2004
#5
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #5
not to get in the middle of your lil quarrel...

but...

a good piston DOES NOT EQUAL a good bottom end
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Mar 19, 2004
#6
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #6
Yeah OK , I have seen more split down the middle of the block at 400 hp at the fly than i can count and they were all tune right too . but whatever man , stock rods and crank will blow out quick too LOL . go ahead and trade , usually if something sounds too good to be true , IT IS .
 
C

crashGTR1

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
128
0
0
Chicago
Mar 19, 2004
#7
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #7
Xanax said:
Crash please don't listen to 2002BLGT because he's a
crackhead that doesn't know 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me' about 5.0's! Crash I think the
94 GT your looking at has a great set up I must say! The Keith
Black 347 Hyperetic pistons are strong pistons that will take the
abuse.The Typhoon Intake is a great match with the AirFlow
Research 165 aluminum heads you will get good numbers with
this set up.I say if your not going to do a IP headswap sell your
98 GT and get the 94GT.
Click to expand...

Would it be even better if I upgraded to AFR 185 or 205 heads? Also, I like this car because it's more economically feasible than a complete headswap for me right now. Even if I were to go with a new block, and pick up a new rods and crankshaft, it would probably still be more affordable. Thanks.
--Adam
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Mar 19, 2004
#8
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #8
Xanax said:
Crash please don't listen to 2002BLGT because he's a
crackhead that doesn't know 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me' about 5.0's! Crash I think the
94 GT your looking at has a great set up I must say! The Keith
Black 347 Hyperetic pistons are strong pistons that will take the
abuse.The Typhoon Intake is a great match with the AirFlow
Research 165 aluminum heads you will get good numbers with
this set up.I say if your not going to do a IP headswap sell your
98 GT and get the 94GT.
Click to expand...


Another crack like this and you will be out the door.
Read the forum rules about personal insults.
 

JLstang351

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2001
528
0
0
atl,ga
Mar 19, 2004
#9
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #9
A buddy of mine has a novi 2000 on his stock blocked 91 coupe. he dynoed at 533 to the wheels, has been like this for several months, only problem so far was blew stock t5 and head gasket! I say get the 94 gt And make some raw HP
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Mar 19, 2004
#10
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #10
JLstang351 said:
A buddy of mine has a novi 2000 on his stock blocked 91 coupe. he dynoed at 533 to the wheels, has been like this for several months, only problem so far was blew stock t5 and head gasket! I say get the 94 gt And make some raw HP
Click to expand...

No offense, but because one is keeping together does not mean that all combos will. I can show you a 600rwhp 4.6 4V stock bottom en that took the abuse for over 2 years before giving up the ghost, and show you many that gave it up at 450rwhp, so your point is moot.

Bottom line, is 500rwhp is as close as you want to get with a standard block or else risk it cracking down the middle.

Bone Racing . . . LOL! You are so correct.
 

gruntman31

Founding Member
Apr 22, 2002
624
0
0
Colorado Springs, Co
Mar 19, 2004
#11
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #11
DOHC 324 stroker. Way more power potential.
 
C

crashGTR1

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
128
0
0
Chicago
Mar 19, 2004
#12
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #12
gruntman31 said:
DOHC 324 stroker. Way more power potential.
Click to expand...

I know that has tons of potential and that's what I want to do eventually, but as of right now I can't afford to built one right. I have the plans pretty much laid out for it when I can afford it, I know exactly what parts and what companies I'm going to go with, it's just that, for now, and probably as long as I'm still in school, I need something a little less expensive, but still powerful. Believe me, I've dreamed about the engine many, many times. BTW, the guy with the car just dropped the price by $500. Thanks.
--Adam
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
894
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
So confirming what I need to do to put a '88 CV 302/AOD in my '65 A-code.
  • 1320stang
  • Apr 19, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2023
1320stang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?