• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Mini-Tub Dilemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter hivewax
  • Start date Start date Jul 6, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Jul 6, 2009
#1
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #1
some are telling me to mini-tub the rear to fit at least 15x10" wheels. what do you all think? are 15x8" fine for this 347 motor? what if... in the future, an alum 427 is put in place? i also have a chance to cut out some rust in the leaf spring to rear frame rail trunk area and in the driver side frame rail in front of the shock tower.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jul 6, 2009
#2
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #2
If you are going to make big power, 427, you will end up running drag radials full time or spin all the time. My car does OK with 275/50/15 M/T DR's on a 15x8. Regular street radials will spin at any speed below 60mph. I think blown65 runs the same DR's on his car with no minitub.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 6, 2009
#3
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #3
Yup they do good on the street. If you only drive on dry pavement I like the Hoosier dr much better though. Slicks stay with m/t. The Hoosier slick I had were terribly inconsistant. I'm running 26x10 mt slicks on 15x8 at the strip and the are perfect. 275/50/15 or 275/40/17 on the street.
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jul 6, 2009
#4
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #4
im running a 8.5" rim with a 26x11 M/T dot slick. rolled fender but it fits!
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Jul 6, 2009
#5
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #5
5280/4 said:
im running a 8.5" rim with a 26x11 M/T dot slick. rolled fender but it fits!
Click to expand...
Did you shorten the rear housing? And the back spacing?


Posted via Mobile Device
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Jul 6, 2009
#6
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #6
blown65 said:
Yup they do good on the street. If you only drive on dry pavement I like the Hoosier dr much better though. Slicks stay with m/t. The Hoosier slick I had were terribly inconsistant. I'm running 26x10 mt slicks on 15x8 at the strip and the are perfect. 275/50/15 or 275/40/17 on the street.
Click to expand...

this is interesting because when I tried putting a set of 275/50/15 MT Drag radials on 8" wheels, the tires were hitting the leaf spring and sticking out passed the fendors. Are your tires inside or even flush with the wheel wells?
 

valley firearms

New Member
Sep 1, 2005
63
0
0
Jul 6, 2009
#7
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #7
I run 295 G force drag radials on my 68/347 and it don't hook on the street or the track.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 6, 2009
#8
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #8
coolblue65 said:
this is interesting because when I tried putting a set of 275/50/15 MT Drag radials on 8" wheels, the tires were hitting the leaf spring and sticking out passed the fendors. Are your tires inside or even flush with the wheel wells?
Click to expand...


They are a tad outside, but not bad. I believe I read your post on those, and your were running 4.25 offset wheels correct? I'm running 4.5" offset. Sometimes I wonder if my rear axle has a different width than some other ppl on here, where the offset sets my wheels out a tad more.

Anyhow, for me they work fine.

I didnt know MT made a 26x11 slick, only a 26x10, then it goes to a 28x11.5? Maybe your talking about a 26x11 ET Street? Those are different dimensions than ET Drag.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 6, 2009
#9
  • Jul 6, 2009
  • #9
valley firearms said:
I run 295 G force drag radials on my 68/347 and it don't hook on the street or the track.
Click to expand...


I can roll into the throttle on mine and stay hooked, obviously I cant just hammer it. However my suspension is setup real loose to transfer well. I'm sure it would handle another 100+hp with no issues on the street the way it is right now. Not sure your combo but with a blower and 347 you should be making fair amount of low end tq, prob some of the problem. Suspension kills anything at the track though. If I can do 1.44 60' on 275/40/17's a blown 347 should be able to.
 

valley firearms

New Member
Sep 1, 2005
63
0
0
Jul 7, 2009
#10
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #10
You are right. I guess it was unfair of me to state that without further info. I do have a 4 link that I have not dialed in due to an recent engine mishap at Polar Raceway. I'm currently in the middle of another engine build as we speak. I wish Summit gave out frequent flier miles. One other reason could be the BFG drag radial is less superior than the M/T. From my own personal experience, I will never buy another set of G-Force drag radials due to the very fast tread wear and lack of traction. That is on my car, they may work better or as designed on another set up. I wish they made the m/t drag radials in a 295/35-18.
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jul 7, 2009
#11
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #11
hivewax said:
Did you shorten the rear housing? And the back spacing?

It is a stock k model mustang with the 9 inch at the same width. I think the bs is 4 1/2 i can check that this week at some point.



Posted via Mobile Device
Click to expand...



Posted via Mobile Device
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jul 7, 2009
#12
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #12
blown65 said:
They are a tad outside, but not bad. I believe I read your post on those, and your were running 4.25 offset wheels correct? I'm running 4.5" offset. Sometimes I wonder if my rear axle has a different width than some other ppl on here, where the offset sets my wheels out a tad more.

Anyhow, for me they work fine.

I didnt know MT made a 26x11 slick, only a 26x10, then it goes to a 28x11.5? Maybe your talking about a 26x11 ET Street? Those are different dimensions than ET Drag.
Click to expand...

you might be right but i bought the setup 15 years ago and just got the car back on the road last summer

Posted via Mobile Device
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Jul 7, 2009
#13
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #13
i talked to a shop. he said i should first buy the rear disc brakes, 9" housing, and wheels before doing a mini-tub. is he correct? if so, how do i know what length to get for the rear housing and what back spacing for the 15x10" wheel? i'm thinking 1" less than stock length and talk to PSE for correct back spacing to make the wheel flush with the body, but then i have to worry about tire bulge.

or should i tell him to just tub it to the max w/out interfering with the fold-down seat or quarter panels?
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 7, 2009
#14
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #14
That's kinda ass backwards. If ur planning to minitub the do that the set the rear width after IMO
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jul 7, 2009
#15
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #15
hivewax said:
i talked to a shop. he said i should first buy the rear disc brakes, 9" housing, and wheels before doing a mini-tub. is he correct? if so, how do i know what length to get for the rear housing and what back spacing for the 15x10" wheel? i'm thinking 1" less than stock length and talk to PSE for correct back spacing to make the wheel flush with the body, but then i have to worry about tire bulge.

or should i tell him to just tub it to the max w/out interfering with the fold-down seat or quarter panels?
Click to expand...



well the brakes will change the offset required for wheels. so i understand that point. but i would do the minitub first and the housing last. you can order a housing any way you want. if you are cutting the housing... get a wheel that will be centered over the bearing, this will promote equal load on that bearing and increase its life.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jul 7, 2009
#16
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #16
The size tire you run will dictate the size rim you run. Even if you did a min tub, it's useless on these cars because you will still hit the leafs. Personally I would run the rims with the least amount of backspace as possible. This will make the rear end shorter with less weight. Bearings are cheap. Figure out the tire size and go from there. Your shop should know that. They are going backwards. Backspace on rims is done on .500 inch increments usually. Rear ends are done in much smaller increments, and can have more accurate placement if rear is done last.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jul 7, 2009
#17
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • #17
Well if your doing a mini tub I would relocate the leafs to get use of it. Otherwise why do one. My leafs are the issue not the tubs in stock form. (a little massaging of one area was needed.)
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Jul 9, 2009
#18
  • Jul 9, 2009
  • #18
5280/4 said:
bs is 4 1/2
Click to expand...

like to know if the back-spacing of your 15x8.5" wheels are correct? TIA
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jul 9, 2009
#19
  • Jul 9, 2009
  • #19
hivewax said:
like to know if the back-spacing of your 15x8.5" wheels are correct? TIA
Click to expand...

i will double check tonight

Posted via Mobile Device
 

hivewax

Member
Jan 1, 2006
233
0
17
Miami, FL
Jul 9, 2009
#20
  • Jul 9, 2009
  • #20
awesome!! i'm going PSE, so maybe Phil can make one like yours.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Paint and Body Strut tower beginning to break apart, how long do I have ?
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 21, 2025
AnthonyA1234
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
284
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Progress Thread Low Mile 89 GT Restomod - Moving toward paint
  • KRUISR
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2026
KRUISR
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?