• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Mods....

  • Thread starter Thread starter '06 stang
  • Start date Start date Jun 11, 2005

'06 stang

New Member
Jun 3, 2005
43
0
0
Ky
Jun 11, 2005
#1
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #1
What mods would be the best bang for the buck and not adversely effect reliability. I would like to get 330-350hp at the rear wheels without a blower or nitrous..........at least until the warranty expires. Anything else besides cat-backs/CAI and flash programmers/ gears ect.? Thanks
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 13, 2005
#2
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #2
any performance mod can Potentially cause a reliability problem, even something simple like a CAI.


To get 350rwhp you are going to need to free up/generate another 100 horses over stock.

So I would guess it will require almost as much work to do as it would to fit a blower on there.

To get 400bhp crank out of a 4.6 (if you like to work on the 15% rule it would be 340rwhp) it will take all the bolt ons (exhaust,manifolds, CAI, electric water pump, pulleys, C/motion plates (?), tune to mention some of them) but I would guess cams are really going to be needed and probably a port & polish job on the heads.

I could be wrong though, as there are some people putting down some good dyno numbers (around the 300rwhp mark) but this is where the 15% rule is probably flawed becuase a few bolt on's is unlikely to net over 50bhp crank. I would guess more like 325-330bhp crank. This would tally in quite nice with the stock dyno numbers (think stock is about 275-280'ish if memory serves). So there should be a similar loss too a slight increase thru the drivetrain as that would have remain constant (ie same box, clutch, prop & drive shafts, beaings ans on).
 
O

OWENMUSTANG

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
23
0
0
Jun 13, 2005
#3
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #3
think you will be lucky to hit 310 rwhp without a blower/nos.
if you did all of the "bolt-ons" should be a lot more fun to drive,
then you could always bolt a nos kit on it for racing.
the other option is to check with your local dealers to find what they will
hold you to. also, i'm guessing ford will have a blower kit availible at some point for these cars. should give you some leverage with your local dealer.
 
N

nbk13nw

Member
Mar 31, 2005
186
4
19
Newport News, Va
Jun 13, 2005
#4
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #4
OWENMUSTANG said:
think you will be lucky to hit 310 rwhp without a blower/nos.
if you did all of the "bolt-ons" should be a lot more fun to drive,
then you could always bolt a nos kit on it for racing.
the other option is to check with your local dealers to find what they will
hold you to. also, i'm guessing ford will have a blower kit availible at some point for these cars. should give you some leverage with your local dealer.
Click to expand...

While having my car tuned at the dyno, another gentleman posted 321rwhp. His mods were... long tube MAC headers, MAC procahmber, MAC axle-backs, JLT Cold Air, Charge Motion plates, UD pulleys and an SCT tune. Held his own against an 03 Cobra while on the first test drive. Stayed bumber to bumper whit the guy, really confused the Cobra guy!
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 13, 2005
#5
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #5
nbk13nw said:
While having my car tuned at the dyno, another gentleman posted 321rwhp. His mods were... long tube MAC headers, MAC procahmber, MAC axle-backs, JLT Cold Air, Charge Motion plates, UD pulleys and an SCT tune. Held his own against an 03 Cobra while on the first test drive. Stayed bumber to bumper whit the guy, really confused the Cobra guy!
Click to expand...
sounds rather impressive, although it doesn't leave all that many more mods to go, electric water pump then its onto the heads and cams. I would guess that it should be near or slightly above 350rwhp with a bit of luck, but I would still guess that the drive train is sapping 30-40hp at most putting the crank bhp at around 380-390.

That would mean it is producing about 85bhp/litre specific output. I doubt whether you would really see any more than that n/a out of the mod engine and still be streetable, but who knows. The new 3v setup and variable timing can perform wonders.
 
O

OWENMUSTANG

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
23
0
0
Jul 6, 2005
#6
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • #6
nbk13nw said:
While having my car tuned at the dyno, another gentleman posted 321rwhp. His mods were... long tube MAC headers, MAC procahmber, MAC axle-backs, JLT Cold Air, Charge Motion plates, UD pulleys and an SCT tune. Held his own against an 03 Cobra while on the first test drive. Stayed bumber to bumper whit the guy, really confused the Cobra guy!
Click to expand...

most people don't consider long tube headers to be a "bolt-on". shorty tubes sure, long tubes are not emissions legal in any state with or without cats.
my response was with that in mind. besides, after installing long tubes on several different kinds of cars (no 05 stangs yet) i will say long tubes definitely do not "bolt on"
 

cleveland

Founding Member
Feb 19, 2002
579
0
0
SF>...
Jul 6, 2005
#7
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • #7
You rang?

-Dan
 
2

2k5 pony

New Member
Sep 11, 2004
21
0
0
virginia beach, va
Jul 6, 2005
#8
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • #8
OWENMUSTANG said:
most people don't consider long tube headers to be a "bolt-on". shorty tubes sure, long tubes are not emissions legal in any state with or without cats.
my response was with that in mind. besides, after installing long tubes on several different kinds of cars (no 05 stangs yet) i will say long tubes definitely do not "bolt on"
Click to expand...


Yeah that is my car he was refering to and I have to admit that installing the longtubes was nothing short of a p.i.t.a Took me over eight hours but I still would consider them a bolt on item with nice gains. I choose to go with the catted prochamber so I might of got a few more hp with the offroad version. I'm still in debate on the head port and polish or SC b/c the head work with install would be over half of the cost of a SC kit....
 
B

blk05vert

New Member
May 27, 2005
34
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jul 9, 2005
#9
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #9
OWENMUSTANG said:
think you will be lucky to hit 310 rwhp without a blower/nos.
if you did all of the "bolt-ons" should be a lot more fun to drive,
then you could always bolt a nos kit on it for racing.
the other option is to check with your local dealers to find what they will
hold you to. also, i'm guessing ford will have a blower kit availible at some point for these cars. should give you some leverage with your local dealer.
Click to expand...
So if Ford releases a blower/SC kit for the 05 GT (according to http://www.fordracingparts.com one is on the way), does that mean we can get it installed from the dealer and it won't void the warranty?
 
N

nbk13nw

Member
Mar 31, 2005
186
4
19
Newport News, Va
Jul 9, 2005
#10
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #10
2k5 pony said:
Yeah that is my car he was refering to and I have to admit that installing the longtubes was nothing short of a p.i.t.a Took me over eight hours but I still would consider them a bolt on item with nice gains. I choose to go with the catted prochamber so I might of got a few more hp with the offroad version. I'm still in debate on the head port and polish or SC b/c the head work with install would be over half of the cost of a SC kit....
Click to expand...

Nice ride by the way! You ever get that grin off of your face?
 

FIRE GT

New Member
May 10, 2005
8
0
0
Jul 9, 2005
#11
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #11
OWENMUSTANG said:
most people don't consider long tube headers to be a "bolt-on". shorty tubes sure, long tubes are not emissions legal in any state with or without cats.
Click to expand...

Why are long tube headers illegal?

Just curious.....

thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
258
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Engine Throwing codes 94, 33, 34, 44, and sporadic engine shutoff.
  • Ryu
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
836
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2024
89ripper
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
S
Engine Problems in AL
  • Shelby Co 5.0
  • Sep 13, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 4, 2022
Shelby Co 5.0
S
spark plug boot
  • Bree
  • Sep 1, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 7, 2021
Bree
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?