• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Money Better Spent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter splogan
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2016
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

splogan

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
127
3
19
Feb 13, 2016
#1
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #1
After I pay off my bills like an adult from taxes I have some left to play with the car. What is money better spent? Lowering springs/rear control arms, A tune to tell the computer the EGR is gone and the exhaust/cai is there or a set of gears. I have Koni shocks struts ready to install already and the car is running stock tune and stock 2.73 rear gears.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Feb 13, 2016
#2
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #2
I would do 3.73-4.10 gears and rebuild the rear end while you're at it and H pipe/cat back for the sound.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and Davedacarpainter

splogan

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
127
3
19
Feb 13, 2016
#3
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #3
The car has a BBK h-pipe/shorty headers and turbo swirl exhaust. Under the hood I deleted the smog pump and EGR and added a CAI.
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,346
5,322
194
Corn County USA
Feb 13, 2016
#4
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #4
My vote goes for gears. If you're frugal and somewhat lucky, you can find a set of lowering springs in a classified forum on the cheap. I'd save the tune until you do something a little more drastic. The biggest reason is you'll need it again anyway so why pay twice if it runs good without it for now. An exhaust upgrade and EGR delete aren't a big deal IMO.....
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

Farrell5.0

Not sure what "DP" means, but know's he likes it!
15 Year Member
Feb 15, 2012
353
299
104
Vancouver, WA
Feb 13, 2016
#5
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #5
Definitely gears. Big butt dyno difference.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter and A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Feb 13, 2016
#6
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #6
Don't need a tune with your setup. Gears all the way!
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
S

Stangbanger95

Member
Jan 10, 2016
19
4
13
Feb 13, 2016
#7
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #7
410's ftw!
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Feb 13, 2016
#8
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #8
Gears, 3.73's if you have a T5. Bump the timing the most you can with 87 octane. Don't run 93, its a waste.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Feb 13, 2016
#9
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #9
3.55 is my favorite gear and gets my vote. I absolutely hated the 3.73 and 4.10 is only good for track car or tire smoke imho
 
S

Stangbanger95

Member
Jan 10, 2016
19
4
13
Feb 13, 2016
#10
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #10
93 isn't a waste. I ping on 87 with my mild set up.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

addermk2

5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2009
308
87
49
Feb 14, 2016
#11
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • #11
Stangbanger95 said:
93 isn't a waste. I ping on 87 with my mild set up.
Click to expand...
If you're pinging... it's because something is wrong with your car. I can guarantee you that 93 is a waste in your car.
 
Reactions: FoxMustangLvr
S

Stangbanger95

Member
Jan 10, 2016
19
4
13
Feb 14, 2016
#12
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • #12
How so? If you bump up compression and timing you need a higher octane, if not there would be no need for anything higher than 87.
 

addermk2

5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2009
308
87
49
Feb 15, 2016
#13
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #13
You raised your compression by .5. Not exactly a racecar. My old 347 ran 11.25:1 and ran on 91 with 33° of total timing.

Your engine has a problem, and using 93 is only masking it.
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Feb 15, 2016
#14
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #14
Stangbanger95 said:
How so? If you bump up compression and timing you need a higher octane, if not there would be no need for anything higher than 87.
Click to expand...
How did you increase your compression? What is your CR?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Feb 15, 2016
#15
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #15
I used to try 87 in my cars. With the stock 10*-12* timing range they ran fine. I will say that my track times ran the best with 93 off and 14-15* timing. 87 octane started to suffer from detonation at that timing. The present car slowed down a .1 so...I don't agree with the 87vs93 comments. I also wouldn't run 87 with a power adder. Big difference between 87 and 91+
 

splogan

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
127
3
19
Feb 15, 2016
#16
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #16
A5literMan, Love the Red 4 eyes. My first was a red 86
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter and A5literMan

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Feb 15, 2016
#17
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #17
A5literMan said:
I used to try 87 in my cars. With the stock 10*-12* timing range they ran fine. I will say that my track times ran the best with 93 off and 14-15* timing. 87 octane started to suffer from detonation at that timing. The present car slowed down a .1 so...I don't agree with the 87vs93 comments. I also wouldn't run 87 with a power adder. Big difference between 87 and 91+
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: A5literMan

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Feb 15, 2016
#18
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #18
@A5literMan
So when I had my car set at 14* timing with 93 I had a stinky fuel smell out of my exhaust. The gas was not completely igniting and the unburnt fuel went out of my exhaust. If I increased my timing to maybe 16* or more would it then compress and ignite the 93 octane completely?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Feb 15, 2016
#19
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #19
Well mine always smelled of gas lol. Off road h pipe=smelly
I do know my plugs read a little richer. Adding too much timing will cause preignition,pinging,etc. Volumetric efficiency does increase with more compression and a timing/octane increase in a optimized motor. I'm only a novice at all of this. Higher octane gas is less resistant to ignition and there is a relationship between plug heat range,spark strength,etc. for it to burn efficiently. So could it smell less with more timing...maybe a little. I like the smell of 93 octane...lol
 
S

Stangbanger95

Member
Jan 10, 2016
19
4
13
Feb 20, 2016
#20
  • Feb 20, 2016
  • #20
Milled gt40p heads. 16 degrees of timing seems to be what it like doesn't ping going up to 18 but doesn't gain anything. When I had to the set to stock I could run 87 but it didn't perform the same and that's track proven for me my trap speed suffered from it.
 
Reactions: A5literMan
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
237
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
G
Expired 2013 Ford Mustang V6 (Grabber Blue) 3:55 gears... Excellent Condition.
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
2
Views
446
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 11, 2026
Grabberblueguy77
G
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
310
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?