• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Moral dilemma regarding Shelby side scoops...

  • Thread starter Thread starter reenmachine
  • Start date Start date Nov 8, 2004

Bogus functional or non-functional scoops?

  • "Functional" scoops that blow on nothing

    Votes: 9 60.0%
  • Just use the non-functional ones

    Votes: 6 40.0%

  • Total voters
    15
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Nov 8, 2004
#1
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #1
OK, I need you guys' help making a decision. I'm building this '67 Shelby clone and need to figure out what to do about the side (brake cooling) scoops. You see, the dilemma stems from the fact that the car has inboard disc brakes. If I install the original-type functional brake cooling scoops, they'll blow into a wheelwell with no brakes in there. I could just install the non-functional version of the side scoops, but non-functional scoops bother me. I have both types on the shelf already, so that's not a problem. Routing the ducting to the inboard brakes isn't really practical on a convertible, and I think they get great airflow in there anyway.

So what to do? Functional scoops that blow on nothing, or non-functional altogether?

EDIT: It may be a moot point -- looking at things in there, it may be impossible to use the functional kit on a convertible anyway because of the quarter window mechanism.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Nov 8, 2004
#2
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #2
So you're trying to decide between useless scoops and pointless scoops. Well pointless except for looks. Are you considering not putting them on at all? I know that would be an obvious part missing from a Shelby, but you're doing a clone...
 

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Nov 8, 2004
#3
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #3
Too bad you're building a clone ...
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 8, 2004
#4
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #4
If you really want the scoop look, main issue, go with the functional ones. Otherwise they will act against you for aerodynamics...
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Nov 8, 2004
#5
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #5
why not make ducting that blows on the inbored disks?
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Nov 8, 2004
#6
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #6
to answer above question
reenmachine said:
Routing the ducting to the inboard brakes isn't really practical on a convertible, and I think they get great airflow in there anyway.
Click to expand...

i would just go ahead and setup the functional ones
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Nov 9, 2004
#7
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #7
practical on his car is long gone
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Nov 9, 2004
#8
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #8
Just remember that anything added that does not function but is just for looks is how the whole "rice" movement it defined. Bling is bad. Make them funcitonal for something.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 9, 2004
#9
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #9
Ronstang said:
Just remember that anything added that does not function but is just for looks is how the whole "rice" movement it defined. Bling is bad. Make them funcitonal for something.
Click to expand...
I understand where you're coming from, but I think that "rice" is about over the top bling. Not all bling is bad, just keep it tasteful. For instance, a nice paint job, or a spoiler on a car isn't bad - it's just the 3 foot high spoiler on a 75 horsepower car that I object to.

I think the Shelby scoops whether functional or not look good on a classic mustang. However, I would spend some time trying to make them functional.
 
M

mustangbrad

Member
Aug 16, 2004
127
5
19
Nov 9, 2004
#10
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #10
By looking at pictures of your car, I can only conclude that you have some awesome fabricating skills. So don't try to tell us that making the scoops functional for the inboard brakes is too hard. Seriously, I don't see a problem with the non-functional scoops. I am not sure they will hurt the aerodynamics of the car too much. Nothing about the early Mustangs are sleek aerodynamicly any way, it would be like putting a "fake" scoop on a brick, not going to hurt you too much.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Nov 9, 2004
#11
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #11
If you are building a clone, just use the functional ones. Think about when someone sees those scoops and can see there is no hole cut out in there....it looks awkward. I speak from personal experience. I have non-functional side scoops and it drives me nuts. They were on the car when I bought it.

As for the ducts actually DOING something.....I wouldnt worry about that. I always wondered that if side scoops were glassed in and not functional and you do some highspeed driving (60mph and above) .....the air would get "caught" in there and possible have them start cracking where they were glassed in. Dont know if that would really happen though. As for aerodynamics.....I dont think they car will be driven than fast to make much of a difference.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 9, 2004
#12
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #12
Oh Yeah... Over 100. Don't you guys drive there?

No seriously, I had a set on my 65 back about 10 years ago (I realize they're bigger, and open) and didn't cut the hole to the brakes. I absolutely felt the difference at about 70. I doubt the smaller closed ones would hurt it much as well...
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Nov 9, 2004
#13
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #13
mdjay said:
Oh Yeah... Over 100. Don't you guys drive there?

No seriously, I had a set on my 65 back about 10 years ago (I realize they're bigger, and open) and didn't cut the hole to the brakes. I absolutely felt the difference at about 70. I doubt the smaller closed ones would hurt it much as well...
Click to expand...


3.89 gears, c4...100mph on the highway....I will pass! LOL!
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Nov 9, 2004
#14
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #14
As far as the "ricer" comment goes, the majority of factory scoops on Mustangs over the years (especially late models) were non-functional. Does this make us all ricers? Even on many original '67 Shelbys the scoops were non-functional. The aero factor doesn't really bother me given the already brick-like aerodynamics of a convertible.

The one point that got to me was the one from mustangbrad. I need to just man up and figure out a way to make them work for something.
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Nov 9, 2004
#15
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #15
I made ours work on our '66 coup by running high temp. hose to the backing plate of our drum brake car. It would be no harder to run the hose to the inboard discs. It does stop the 1/4 window from rolling up and down. Ours bolt in the 'up' position and come out for track events. Side scoops that don't work are worthless in my opinion. If it doesn't work, why have it on the car?



The car is in mock up stage for the brake coolers and the watts link.


John
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Nov 9, 2004
#16
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #16
yeah, i have to agree with mustangbrad, the work you do is amazing and there has to be some way u can make them work, i have faith!
 
M

mustangbrad

Member
Aug 16, 2004
127
5
19
Nov 9, 2004
#17
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #17
I wasn't trying to talk you into more fabrication work. It already looks like space is at a premium for exhaust, unless it is going to dump before the rear axle. If you want to make them functional, I'm sure that you can make them work. Just some friendly encouragement.

I don't mean to change the subject, but how will that independent rear take "spirited" driving. I guess what I am really asking is will it be as durable under hard cornering as a cobra type, with upper and lower control arms, or is it more for ride quality?
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Nov 9, 2004
#18
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #18
Damn Guys, what ever happened to building a car the way you want it.

If you like the looks of the scoops, put them on.

If you can make them functional, all the better.

I put them on the 70 ragtop cause i didn't think it looked like a Mustang without something back there, 70 was the first year with nothing.

I put them on the 69 coupe because 69 has that stupid backasswards scoop that always bothered the piss outta me.

I intend to make the 70 scoops function when I restore it, although I never considered the rear windows being in the way, may have to look at that a bit to see if it's worth the trouble.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Nov 9, 2004
#19
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #19
My rear windows were rendered obsolete
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Nov 9, 2004
#20
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #20
Make it easy on yourself.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 2014 V6 'chelle-b Ii'
  • Colorado66
  • Aug 26, 2017
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
8K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2019
Noobz347
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
Heat Exchanger Location Questions
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 16, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 17, 2014
hoopty5.0
2013 Shelby GT500 Super Snake Wide Body
  • MRaburn
  • Jan 25, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
1
Views
7K
StangNet Site News Jan 25, 2013
Noobz347
B
  • Locked
Expired 00/03 Cobra Clone Fully Built Street/track Monster Kenne Bell
  • BOSS GT
  • Aug 20, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
4
Views
12K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 29, 2013
BOSS GT
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?