• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

motor mount recommendations please

  • Thread starter Thread starter I candy
  • Start date Start date Jul 2, 2010

I candy

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
597
1
18
Honolulu
Jul 2, 2010
#1
  • Jul 2, 2010
  • #1
i tried searching but only found questions about mount problems but not exactly one that recomends a certain brand over another.

i'm ordering from Summitracing.com and putting my order together. I know i want Polyurathane mounts.

is one brand or model better than another? what do you guys use and do you recomend them?

any infor is a great help.

car is used for street. and a stroked motor with agressive cam is goin in.
 
M

mike0227

Member
Dec 19, 2004
53
0
7
Houston Texas
Jul 4, 2010
#2
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #2
mount problem

The energy suspension will not lift the engine as high as the prothane or stock rubber mounts.

Could be just my car, I had to shim mounts to so steering rack did not hit passenger side of 7qt pan.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Jul 4, 2010
#3
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #3
Energy suspension is probably what's most used.
Really can't go wrong with them.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 4, 2010
#4
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #4
In case it wasn't found in a search (it's old) and it helps:

http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/686011-prothane-vs-energy-suspension-engine-mounts.html
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Jul 4, 2010
#5
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #5
If you look at Prothane vs Energy Susp in a side by side compaison, the prothane looks much stronger. Plus prothane offers a 100 percent lifetime guarantee
 

I candy

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
597
1
18
Honolulu
Jul 5, 2010
#6
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #6
thanks very informative everyone!!

Kdubslugga said:
If you look at Prothane vs Energy Susp in a side by side compaison, the prothane looks much stronger. Plus prothane offers a 100 percent lifetime guarantee
Click to expand...


because they may be stronger and have a better guarantee i may go with these. but has any one had any clearance inssues with a stock block and system max upper and lower intake with no spacer??
(this is for a 89 vert if it matters with stock k member)

also going to need to order bushing for the rear shocks and stuff. its so worn out that its not even there. any recomendations for them too?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 5, 2010
#7
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #7
New shocks will likely come with new bushings.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Jul 5, 2010
#8
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #8
I candy said:
thanks very informative everyone!!




because they may be stronger and have a better guarantee i may go with these. but has any one had any clearance inssues with a stock block and system max upper and lower intake with no spacer??
(this is for a 89 vert if it matters with stock k member)

also going to need to order bushing for the rear shocks and stuff. its so worn out that its not even there. any recomendations for them too?
Click to expand...

I've never heard of anyone having to replace energy suspension motor mounts.
Also, the extra height of the mounts drives the transmission up in the tunnel, may sound like no big deal, but it can be.
 

I candy

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
597
1
18
Honolulu
Jul 7, 2010
#9
  • Jul 7, 2010
  • #9
2000xp8 said:
I've never heard of anyone having to replace energy suspension motor mounts.
Also, the extra height of the mounts drives the transmission up in the tunnel, may sound like no big deal, but it can be.
Click to expand...

trans mission is an Artcarr automatic

think i'll stick with something closer to the stock levels then just to play it safe.

I don't think i need new shocks. i didn't really run the car. it sat for like 4 years plus. i just need bushings.
 

Beasty306GT

Active Member
Dec 19, 2002
671
4
28
Oxford,Mass
Jul 7, 2010
#10
  • Jul 7, 2010
  • #10
go with convertable mounts
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jul 7, 2010
#11
  • Jul 7, 2010
  • #11
I wasn't aware there's a special poly convertible mount (the same is not true for OEM style mounts).
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Jul 9, 2010
#12
  • Jul 9, 2010
  • #12
solid mounts FTMFW! hahaha
 

I candy

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
597
1
18
Honolulu
Jul 12, 2010
#13
  • Jul 12, 2010
  • #13
HISSIN50 said:
I wasn't aware there's a special poly convertible mount (the same is not true for OEM style mounts).
Click to expand...

always one in every group. lol.
 

SLO_5-OH

New Member
Nov 12, 2007
20
0
1
Stuarts Draft, VA
Jul 12, 2010
#14
  • Jul 12, 2010
  • #14
Here is my experience with both the Prothane and Energy Suspension mounts:

Prothane vs Energy Suspension Motor Mounts - Actual Height Difference - Corral.net : Ford Mustang Forums

I didn't like the Prothane mounts because they are higher and cause a much more radical tilt with the engine in relation to front to back. The Energy Suspension mounts put the engine much closer to level.

Hope that helps,
Dean
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
467
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
669
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
570
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Chevy Equinox- Devil in Disguise?
  • RaggedGT
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
18
Views
582
Other Auto Tech Jul 31, 2025
RaggedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?