motor mounts for '66 coupe

M

mike8621

New Member

Mar 12, 2007

2

0

0

Mar 12, 2007

#1

• Mar 12, 2007

• #1

I have a 66 coupe with a 302 HO out of a 91 t-bird linked to a T5. My only problem has been that my engine is sitting just over an inch too low. I have the late 66 engine frame brackets which are identical to the 67 289 engine frame brackets. I just installed new motor mounts, but the engine still sits too low. Would anyone know any combination of engine frame brackets and mounts that would allow me to raise the engine to where i need it?

 

tos

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2001

896

68

59

Cincinnati Ohio

Mar 13, 2007

#2

• Mar 13, 2007

• #2

If the engine mount bolts to the engine vertically as the older engines do why dont you make up a couple of 1 inch spacers. I'm not familiar with the ho block but I think it mounts the same to the engine.

 

L

Lay It

Founding Member

May 15, 2002

150

0

0

NJ

Mar 13, 2007

#3

• Mar 13, 2007

• #3

Are the mounts the "j-mount" style or the other kind. I'm running the other kind with motor mounts for a 67 or 68 289. they bolted right to the 5.0 HO block and the motor is a good height. If you are using the j-mount style you can probably just make up some spacers.

 

J

JamesW

Member

Jul 15, 2005

64

0

6

Central Texas

Mar 13, 2007

#4

• Mar 13, 2007

• #4

http://www.midnightdsigns.com/Mustang/Engine.htm

This page has photos of the motor mounts I'm running. standard 66 style mounts

 

M

mike8621

New Member

Mar 12, 2007

2

0

0

Apr 12, 2007

#5

• Apr 12, 2007

• #5

I tried the 67 style mounts but unfortunately they dropped the engine another 1/2 inch. I was able to get older style mounts, i think early 66, but they have barely helped. I think my last recourse is to custom build my mounts. thanks for you suggestions and help.

 

DukeGnarley

Member

Apr 2, 2003

597

2

19

Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa

Apr 12, 2007

#6

• Apr 12, 2007

• #6

I put an '89 HO into a '66 coupe using the '67 mounts and had no issues. Is it the driveline angle you are concerned about or are there other issues?

 

iskwezm

10 Year Member

May 24, 2005

4,159

20

79

Rowland Heights,California

Apr 12, 2007

#7

• Apr 12, 2007

• #7

i use the early 65' i heard it sits higher with these

 

dennis112

15 Year Member

May 15, 2005

1,561

36

79

Amish Wonderland of Central PA.

Apr 13, 2007

#8

• Apr 13, 2007

• #8

65' type 3 piece motor mounts actually make the motor sit LOWER in the chassis compared to the later 2 piece mounts, about an inch lower. Most header manufacturer's recommend the 66' mounts because the added motor height gives additional clearance due to the fact that the motor is located higher in the V shaped engine compartment.

I would suggest investigating aftermarket type mounts as I have heard that they tend to locate the engine higher than normal.