• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Muffler discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter S&B
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Mar 21, 2012
#21
  • Mar 21, 2012
  • #21
VibrantRedGT said:
The results in HP order:

1.Flowtech Warlock (open) 374.2 hp/ 333.1 tq
2.Bassani Real Street 373.7 hp/ 333.8 tq
3.Hooker Maxflow 373.5 hp/ 333 tq
4.Borla XS 373.3 hp/ 332.6 tq
5.Magnaflow 372.8 / 332.5 tq
6.MAC 372.3 hp / 331.5 tq
7.Flowtech Afterburner 372.3 hp/ 330.1 tq
8.Hooker Aerochamber 372.1 hp/ 330.4 tq
9.Bassani 372 hp/ 333.5 tq
10.Spintech 371.6 hp/ 332.2 tq
11.Edelbrock Performer RPM 370.9 hp / 331.3 tq
12.Borla XR1 370 hp/ 334 tq
13.Flowtech Terminator 369.5 hp / 331.3 tq
14.Dynomax Ultra Flo 369.4 / 333.2 tq
15.Flowmaster 369.4 hp / 331.8 tq
16.Flowtech Warlock 366.3 hp / 325.3 tq
17.No muffs 365.2 hp / 330.1 tq

Sound Off in Quietest to Loudest (Decibels):

1.Borla XS, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 110db at WOT.
2.Hooker Maxflow, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
3.Magnaflow, 82db at idle, 91 at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
4.Flowmaster, 82db at idle, 93 at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
5.Flowtech Warlock, 83db at idle, 92 at 2,000 rpm, 112db at WOT.
6.Dynomax UltraFlo, 83db at idle, 94 at 2,000 rpm, 113db at WOT.
7.Borla XR1, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
8.Bassani Street, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
9.Edelbrock RPM, 84db at idle, 93db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
10.Bassani Real Street, 84db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
11.Flowtech Afterburner, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
12.Flowtech Terminator, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
13.Hooker Aerochamber, 87db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
14.SpinTech, 87db at idle, 97db at 2,000 rpm, 116db at WOT.
15.MAC, 87db at idle, 98db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
16.No Muffler, 91db at idle, 103db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
Click to expand...


Precisely what I was talking about. Second highest HP and second lowest DB Rating for magnaflow. Those are the mufflers I got in my CB, my cousin did two years ago when he ordered and a buddy just bought them and were installing them shortly. Same muffs. Same great performance. Same quiet sound.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Mar 21, 2012
#22
  • Mar 21, 2012
  • #22
My MACs drone like a mother ****. Looks like I may need to upgrade to magnaflow... though the MACs sound wicked awesome

Sent from my cubicle via tapatalk
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 21, 2012
#23
  • Mar 21, 2012
  • #23
N8Dogg98 said:
My MACs drone like a mother ****. Looks like I may need to upgrade to magnaflow... though the MACs sound wicked awesome

Sent from my cubicle via tapatalk
Click to expand...

My car has MAC ceramic 1-3/4" Long Tubes, MAC 3" Prochamber and MAC 3" Cat Back /w 3" Chrome Tips. My car doesn't drone probably because with the 3" pipes it moves the normal drone rpm up by a few hundred. So at 2100-2600 rpm where it normally drones I get nothing. With a 2.5" pipe it will drone like crazy right there. It's probably the most aggressive sounding Mustang I've heard without forced induction (cam .562 lift).

Video at idle.
http://s19.photobucket.com/albums/b187/jpjr50/?action=view&current=CIMG0446.mp4
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Mar 22, 2012
#24
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #24
great chart.....that explains why i love my macs so much! i get no drone with my mac catback flowpaths, vibrantredgt love to hear your car i have always felt mine is the most agressive sounding ive heard
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 22, 2012
#25
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #25
89stang1 said:
great chart.....that explains why i love my macs so much! i get no drone with my mac catback flowpaths, vibrantredgt love to hear your car i have always felt mine is the most agressive sounding ive heard
Click to expand...
Then sir, I would say that you probably aren't familiar with the sound of exhaust drone when you hear it. Mac's are some of the worst offenders when it comes to exhaust drone. Probably as bad, or more so than 40-series Flowmasters. Even when I had my stock H-pipe on, the "bellowing" inside the cabin of my mustang was quite apparent in about the 1,800-2,200RPM ranges. This was with 3.55:1 rear gearing.

My exhaust eventually consisted of Mac 1 5/8" shorties, 2 1/2" X-pipe and full 2 1/2" Mac cat back. Not saying it wasn't a great sounding exhaust....but drone free it was not.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Mar 22, 2012
#26
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #26
+1 Brian... the MAC's are BRUTAL with the drone... they sound great under throttle, but cruising on the highway is just plain awful. I can only stay at one speed for about 5 minutes before going damn near crazy. I find that I adjust the cruise control in 5 mph increments to change the tone of the drone
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Mar 22, 2012
#27
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #27
im not gonna argue.... dont know if the dynamat is keeping me from the drones but my car has no drone at all at any speed just a pleasant rumble to a huge grunt! cruising at highway speed longtubes or-h pipe and mac catback its easy to listen to radio and talk no drone at all none! BTW i have heard drone in many cars including some ive owned
 

MrBone

New Member
Mar 10, 2012
18
0
1
Parker, CO
Mar 22, 2012
#28
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #28
I had Flowmaster 40 series on my 1991 Z28 (I know, flame away!), and on my 1999 Dodge Ram. Both cars sounded great as long as you were outside and not driving them. The drone about drove me crazy.

Just yesterday I took my GT to Meineke and told them to cut the stock mufflers out of it and put straight pipes in their place. It only cost me $100 so I figured it wouldn't hurt too bad if I decided I didn't like it.

I love the sound. It sounds like a European V8. There is a little droning in the cockpit, but it's negligable. Nothing at all like the Flowmaster's. And, just by seat of the pants feel it has opened up a little power in the car.

I don't understand the straight pipe comments about sounding like a farm truck. I've heard farm trucks and they don't sound anything like my GT now does. It's got a rather exotic bark to it, that's a lot quieter than my Harley with Vance & Hines pipes on it.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 22, 2012
#29
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #29
To each their own. I found straight pipes to be annoying. If you can handle it and enjoy the sound congrats.

Oh about the time line for the muffler. The book I got the information from is almost 10 years old. I posted it because its a good guide that you can compare to newer technology mufflers. For instance Flowmaster changed the baffles / chambers internally but the sound has not changed. I was watching Speed and I've seen mufflers that now have internal doors that open and close depending on throttle. Still has the same decibel and HP stats. So although many of the mufflers listed may be dated all the manufacture did is dressed up the same turd. Those stats posted are relevant today. The Material to build them has changed but in internally it's basically the same. If you want a chambered muffler we are all accustomed to then Flowmaster, Spintech, MAC and others are your bag. I'm older so I want something a little quieter, a straight thru design with fiberglass packing is more my style (Dynomax, Magnaflow or equivalent is the way to go).

It's good to see people asking questions about mufflers. Usually it's on the car already and too late before its realized probably not the best choice.
 

txcanyon

New Member
Aug 29, 2011
15
0
1
Mar 23, 2012
#30
  • Mar 23, 2012
  • #30
The PO of my 92GT replaced the factory Hpipe with an offroad X, and probably 40s dumped. I did some sound checking on Youtube and decided that the Flowmaster Force 2 will fit my bill.. it uses the delta 50s in place of the 40s.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 23, 2012
#31
  • Mar 23, 2012
  • #31
Oh and my MAC's didn't drone either. I say that because they probably did but because my exhaust was so huge it droned at a different cruising RPM. Like mentioned earlier the drone rpm is around 2100-2600rpm. With a full 3" exhaust I think my drone was closer to 3000rpm. However at that rpm it's well over 80MPH and I shouldn't be running that fast. I think RPM (gear ratio) and exhaust size determines the dreaded drone.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Mar 24, 2012
#32
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #32
My 5 liter explorer (with supercharger) had a mac 3in catback, droned pretty bad.
Switched to a magnaflow and it was definitely better. With that said, please realize that there are multiple magnaflows available now.

Mrbone, sorry but you did NOT get a better seat of the pants feel, there just isn't enough change. Just because it's louder doesn't mean it's going faster.
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Mar 24, 2012
#33
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #33
2000xp8 said:
Just because it's louder doesn't mean it's going faster.
Click to expand...


YOU dont know that

Im pretty sure dumping the exhaust behind the muffler adds at least 100 hp
 

MrBone

New Member
Mar 10, 2012
18
0
1
Parker, CO
Mar 24, 2012
#34
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #34
Well, don't know about 100 hp, maybe 2 or 3. After driving this thing around now for 2 or 3 days I think I'll be putting some mufflers back on it. It was cool to experiment with, but a tad too loud and at higher RPM the engine seems to have some flat spots.

Not gonna go with Flowmaster again... I'm gonna wait and listen to other cars like mine, run 'em down and ask what they have welded it.

And, hate to disagree with you 2000xp8, but seat of the pants feel? Yeah, there's a difference, not much, but a difference. Been doing this a little while, mostly on motorcycles (former pro superbike racer), and I think I can tell a difference in acceleration when I feel it. But thanks for your input.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Mar 24, 2012
#35
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #35
2000xp8 said:
My 5 liter explorer (with supercharger) had a mac 3in catback, droned pretty bad.
Switched to a magnaflow and it was definitely better. With that said, please realize that there are multiple magnaflows available now.

Mrbone, sorry but you did NOT get a better seat of the pants feel, there just isn't enough change. Just because it's louder doesn't mean it's going faster.
Click to expand...


Aren't they very specific which mufflers you're getting with the full CB exhausts?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 24, 2012
#36
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #36
MrBone said:
And, hate to disagree with you 2000xp8, but seat of the pants feel? Yeah, there's a difference, not much, but a difference. Been doing this a little while, mostly on motorcycles (former pro superbike racer), and I think I can tell a difference in acceleration when I feel it. But thanks for your input.
Click to expand...
Feeling a 2-3hp difference with a 300-500lb motorcycle....sure.
Feeling a 2-3hp difference with a 3,000lb + car.....not likely.

I think your SOTP feeling is more audible than anything. It sounds faster, therefore it must feel faster sort of thing.
 

MrBone

New Member
Mar 10, 2012
18
0
1
Parker, CO
Mar 24, 2012
#37
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #37
gearbanger... & 2000xp8 - Youze are probably right, I just like arguing a bit. Sounds faster...! Scared a guy in a Dodge Viper in the mountains today.
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Mar 24, 2012
#38
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #38
MrBone said:
gearbanger... & 2000xp8 - Youze are probably right, I just like arguing a bit. Sounds faster...! Scared a guy in a Dodge Viper in the mountains today.
Click to expand...

dam u scared a viper sheeeuut had to be droning then
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mufflers for stock 5.0
  • MrPerfect2
  • Dec 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 12, 2025
Mustang5L5
T
Resolved Exhaust/Muffler tips
  • Tom77
  • May 9, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
339
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
Tom77
T
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
218
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
505
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
668
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?