• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Mustang II front suspension questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter wicked93gs
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2009

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 6, 2009
#1
  • Feb 6, 2009
  • #1
well, I just ordered a mustang II front suspension conversion so I can use a DOHC 4.6L engine, I'm sure the kit will be here within a week or two...I have a couple questions though...

1. I did not get coilovers...simply because I dont see myself adjusting ride height all the time, however, I would like it to sit lower than stock....so I was considering cutting the mustang II springs...anyone have any idea if I would cut the same amount as if I was cutting stock 66 springs?

2. I'm still looking for suggestions on extra bracing for the front end....maybe I can run a brace from the firewall, under the fenders, then down to the frame rails? any pictures of any extra bracing would be cool.

3. This has nothing to do with the mustang II suspension, but my 66 was a GT, with front disc brakes from the factory....just curious as to what these setups are going for these days...would like to make some of my money back out this deal, which will fund me getting new fenders and a hood
 

Cobra5.0Jeep

Member
Nov 4, 2005
159
0
17
Grass Valley, CA
Feb 7, 2009
#2
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #2
what conversion did you get?
I wouldn't cut the springs it'll make it ride hard.
Heres my setup.

I was going to install my 532ci last week but ran into part problems. Maybe tomorrow.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 7, 2009
#3
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #3
I got a Heidts kit, I always hear good things about them, and in the end I got it for the same price as one of the cheaper kits(mainly because I didnt want coilovers I guess) I dont mind a stiffer ride...as long as its not too stiff...is it possible perhaps to use some V6 mustang II springs and cut them? possibly ending up with a spring rate and stiffness similar to the v8 springs? maybe its possible just to use some coilover springs and adjusters, instead of getting new shocks too...? also....do you think its possible to run some bracing under the fender and down to the fame rails, keeping it out of sight...not that I mind the sight of them so much as I want as much room in the engine bay as possible...kinda tired of working in tight places, also if you could a picture of the ride height after you install your engine would be nice too...did you get coilovers?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 7, 2009
#4
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #4
before you start cutting springs, get the suspension installed first. you never know it might ride just where you want it. if you do decide to cut the springs, cut a 1/4 coil at a time until you get the ride height you want. you can start with the V6 springs, in fact they are a good choice for your car as light as it is.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 7, 2009
#5
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #5
well, yeah I was going to get it all installed first and give it a few weeks to settle, as for the v6 springs...a possibility(I'd have to buy some, assuming stock MII springs will work with the kit) but the 4.6L DOHC engine is only 5lbs lighter than the 5.0L/302....so I assume the same springs would be needed, or rather the same rate springs(once coil cutting is done anyway) right now I'm just trying to figure out options when that point comes
 

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Feb 7, 2009
#6
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #6
Here's what I did to reinforce the front end in my 67 coupe. I ran the brace from the corner of the firewall to the frame right in front of the springs. I also fabricated some additional bracing that connects to the inner fender so there would be something substantial to attach an export brace to.




There are more pictures in the MII thread that Reenmachine started last year.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 7, 2009
#7
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #7
cool, I'll check it out...I like that idea...keeps it out if the way
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 8, 2009
#8
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #8
what gauge is that tubing by the way?
 

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Feb 8, 2009
#9
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #9
wicked93gs said:
what gauge is that tubing by the way?
Click to expand...

The tubing is 1-5/8" OD 10ga.
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Feb 8, 2009
#10
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #10
You can always switch to a dropped spindle and you wont have to do anything to the springs.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 8, 2009
#11
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #11
it comes standard with 2" dropped spindles just to sit at stock ride height...at least according to heidts
 
F

fastcoupe68

Member
Mar 10, 2004
368
0
17
nj
Feb 8, 2009
#12
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #12
Thats interesting. I have the R&C set up in my 68 and it has 2" dropped spindles and the car is really low. I believe I will have to swap them for the regular spindles because it sits to low.
ken
 

mustbereel

Member
May 6, 2005
318
0
17
Escondido, CA
Feb 9, 2009
#13
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #13
fastcoupe68 said:
Thats interesting. I have the R&C set up in my 68 and it has 2" dropped spindles and the car is really low. I believe I will have to swap them for the regular spindles because it sits to low.
ken
Click to expand...


My R&C is the same way. R&C has additional adjustment for height (using the coilover mount) and I have that at the highest position. The car is still very low.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 9, 2009
#14
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #14
that is weird...maybe R&C has a lower control arm mounting point...or maybe a lower x-member? I guess I'll find out when I get it installed...hopefully I wont have to cut springs at all...but who knows...it may be too low then and I'll have to find taller springs
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Feb 9, 2009
#15
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #15
Hmm, I have mine mounted on 2" drop spindles on the R&C front-end, it does still low, I just thought that was because the suspension and ride height haven't need finalized, but I have a set of Standard Spindles too.
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Feb 9, 2009
#16
  • Feb 9, 2009
  • #16
They did tell me that their design isn't the same as the MII, they changed the angles to build a better suspension. He's had a few different versions over the years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Front suspension upgrade going on one of our 64/5-68 Mustangs
  • Restomotive
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
132
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
Restomotive
R
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
177
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
316
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
60
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2026
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?