• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Mustang Performance Chips!! Cheap??

  • Thread starter Thread starter savegoodautonfg
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2005
S

savegoodautonfg

New Member
May 11, 2005
1,085
0
0
Jul 28, 2005
#1
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #1
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/20HP...990017876QQcategoryZ33597QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Look at that..

DO you know if this is BS or not?

It looks legit but who knows.

Let me know please..
 

z9_87

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
332
0
0
Urbana, IL
Jul 28, 2005
#2
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #2
I doubt it, it looks like just maybe a resistor in the picture?
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jul 28, 2005
#3
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #3
Yes it's BS. These are all over eBay -- just resistors to plug into your coolant temp sensor and make the computer think it's running cooler than it is.
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Jul 28, 2005
#4
  • Jul 28, 2005
  • #4
classic case of snake oil. its nothing more then a resistor that tricks the ecu into thinking it is cold outside which richens the air/fuel ratio and advances the timing. if its really hot out, the ecu thinks it is cold and you can have pinging. save your money
 
S

Scorcher2005

Member
Apr 17, 2004
883
0
16
South Carolina
Jul 29, 2005
#5
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #5
heh, my friends put that into their ecu. some former honda tech did it for them. all it is is a resistor to trick the computer to make it thinks its colder so it adds more fuel. They say they can feel the difference, yet all they are doing is getting worse mpg. stupid ricers :-/
 

85mcLaren

Member
Feb 26, 2004
45
0
7
Jul 29, 2005
#6
  • Jul 29, 2005
  • #6
Yeah - But I remember 'back in the day' before any performance parts came out, we use to take the ACT out and let it sit in the air and do the same for the collant temp sensor. It really did no good (may even hurt performance), but years ago, you had to try what was un-proven at that time. I remember a test article was done on a dyno years ago that did the same thing, and NO difference in HP was noticed. The processor doesn't use those sensors to adjust air/fuel ratio as much as people think. Maybe some, but not enough to make any performance difference (at least in my book).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
2000 Mustang PATS - Broken Key and Wire - HELP!
  • Laree Taylor
  • May 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
246
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 12, 2026
manicmechanic007
1
Electrical Headlight harness trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
362
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
W
Excited to Join the Mustang Community
  • Word24
  • Sep 9, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
422
The Welcome Wagon Dec 30, 2025
General karthief
Engine Information that is Needed When You Post a "Car is not Running" or "Car is Running Poorly" Thread
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 4, 2025
Bullitt347
Interior and Upholstery Corbeau GTS-II, shaved foam or standard?
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Jan 7, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 21, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?