• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Mustang vs lancer evo 8

  • Thread starter Thread starter hahnan03gt
  • Start date Start date Aug 1, 2004
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

zgarske1038

Member
Dec 7, 2003
222
0
17
Hilton Head Island, South Carolina
Aug 1, 2004
#21
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #21
beat a evo this week at the track cars are real fast off the line

i may add either the guy couldn't drive or it was an older evo
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Aug 1, 2004
#22
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #22
The evo from a stop would rip a stock GT. From a roll i say you could pull on them off through the end of first, be a head by a tad by the end of 2nd, then start to get pulled in third. Ive raced aWRX (non STI) and beat it from a 30 roll (dont ask why 30, it just ended up that way). However, STI's would most likly be a closer/even race.
Mike
 

Blue Blurr

New Member
Apr 1, 2004
279
0
0
California
Aug 1, 2004
#23
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #23
there actaully comparing the STi to the 03 cobra and some of the numbers are pretty close. that would be a good race
 
G

GregGTStang

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
240
0
0
Aug 1, 2004
#24
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #24
Yeah, the STi is a nice, fast car. It's probably more fun to drive than a 'Stang.
 

Blue Blurr

New Member
Apr 1, 2004
279
0
0
California
Aug 1, 2004
#25
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #25
yes they are very fun to drive
 

GTsleeper

New Member
Nov 26, 2003
179
0
0
St.Louis, Missouri
Aug 1, 2004
#26
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #26
The STI 1/4 mile runs are even with the 03-04 cobra stock. Maybe .5 secs quicker depends on driver according to car and driver magazine. The only thing is how much faster can you make the STI its already maxed out I believe (not totally sure). That engine can only take so much psi with the turbo. Put gears and change pulley size on the cobra as well as a programmer and even drag radials, BAM there you go the STI is smoked with plenty of room to still add mods to an 03-04 cobra if you really need to. Don't get me wrong the STI is one hell of a vehicle but its pretty much done where its at.
 
T

Tx01Muscle

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
32
0
0
Aug 1, 2004
#27
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #27
Yeah the subaru is compared to a Cobra, but it's not. Hotrod has the 1/4 mile of the sti @ 13.29. Muscle Mustangs & FF have the Cobra (convertible) @ 12.77! The same article has the Mach 1 @ 13.156, and a stock GT (automatic) @ 14.095. The GT would have been much better if standard. The STI is pretty fast but it's no Mustang. It's an eysore as well.
 
A

alfman9

New Member
Apr 9, 2004
217
0
0
Florida
Aug 1, 2004
#28
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #28
sti s are only fast if the driver can drive. Had one pull up to me at a red light and I didnt notice him until he redlined the blow off valve. Light turned green and he popped it and dropped it. I waited for him and was waving bye bye to him half way in second, but that is my slowmatic problem.
 

Ghostface

Member
Jan 11, 2004
226
0
17
Aug 1, 2004
#29
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #29
a better comparison would be a Mach 1 vs. EVO, same price range. Mach 1 would walk it from a dead stop or roll. But like Blue Burr said, it's a completely different story in the twisties. EVO is a badazz car.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Aug 1, 2004
#30
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #30
OK to end this **** right now.. once and for all... STOCK FOR STOCK AN 03 COBRA WILL ***** ALL OVER AN STI. From a roll it will be so bad that the passenger in cobra will imit a loud laughter as the cobra proceeds to put buslengths on the STI. From a stop... The sti will pull through first just long enough to make him think he has a chance... by the middle of second, the cobra will be runnning by the STI and proceed to rape him analy..
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Aug 1, 2004
#31
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #31
The reason why HOTROD ran a 13.20 in the cobra is because they launch it like an sti, OFF THE LIMITER
 
T

Tx01Muscle

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
32
0
0
Aug 1, 2004
#32
  • Aug 1, 2004
  • #32
I agree w/ that guy up there ^^^^.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Aug 2, 2004
#33
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #33
me 2
 
U

Unfazed

New Member
Nov 23, 2002
23
0
0
Lompoc, Ca
Aug 2, 2004
#34
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #34
I think it’s a diver’s race. When cars are close in trap speeds and 1/4 times it’s just down to the driver. I also say this because all the evos I've seen at the track didn't do all that fantastic. I know they have potential with a good driver but all I've seen was 13.9 to 14.5, and we are talking stock.
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Aug 2, 2004
#35
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #35
Unfazed said:
I think it’s a diver’s race. When cars are close in trap speeds and 1/4 times it’s just down to the driver. I also say this because all the evos I've seen at the track didn't do all that fantastic. I know they have potential with a good driver but all I've seen was 13.9 to 14.5, and we are talking stock.
Click to expand...

Please tell me your talking about the STI... The cobra and STI are no where close in trap speeds.. ive seen cobras at HRP trap 12.7-12.9@111-114, while the STI are around 13.2-13.5@104-105. Half a second is literally 2 busleangths, and if the STI doesnt do a tranny destroying 7k launch.. its a high 13 sec car.
 
9

98laseredgt

New Member
Jul 16, 2004
122
0
0
indianapolis
Aug 2, 2004
#36
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #36
my AWD eclipse was an EVO speedwise, every one i raced was dead even. and at the track the eclispe ran a 12.8@105. that said, i walked all over every GT i raced including a 02gt with headers, full exhaust (magnaflow, no cats) and a cai and pullies. and a few mach 1's. they werent going to catch up either, as when i let out at ~145 i was 2 cars up and pulling. camparing trap speeds only goes so far when comparing highway speed. they still have plenty of highway pickup, but they have low traps because of the traction. as for stock for stock GT v. EVO, i give it to the evo. MACH 1 v. EVO from a roll its a drivers race.
 
U

Unfazed

New Member
Nov 23, 2002
23
0
0
Lompoc, Ca
Aug 2, 2004
#37
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #37
BigHairyMonkey said:
Please tell me your talking about the STI... The cobra and STI are no where close in trap speeds.. ive seen cobras at HRP trap 12.7-12.9@111-114, while the STI are around 13.2-13.5@104-105. Half a second is literally 2 busleangths, and if the STI doesnt do a tranny destroying 7k launch.. its a high 13 sec car.
Click to expand...

I was talking about the original thread, that being stock gt vs. stock evo. I too seen stock Cobra's run those kind of times as well but with my limited track visits I haven’t seen any evo's under 13.9 Of course I've only seen about 4 evo's run. I don't think they we're launching hard enough. Best 60 foots was I think a 1.9
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Aug 2, 2004
#38
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #38
no matter how fast a STI or a EVO is deep inside they are still crying because they have 4 doors... i Think that the stand is just 4.10s away from winning
 

StangFreak32

New Member
Jul 16, 2004
75
0
0
Baton Rouge, La
Aug 2, 2004
#39
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #39
98laseredgt said:
my AWD eclipse was an EVO speedwise, every one i raced was dead even. and at the track the eclispe ran a 12.8@105. that said, i walked all over every GT i raced including a 02gt with headers, full exhaust (magnaflow, no cats) and a cai and pullies. and a few mach 1's. they werent going to catch up either, as when i let out at ~145 i was 2 cars up and pulling. camparing trap speeds only goes so far when comparing highway speed. they still have plenty of highway pickup, but they have low traps because of the traction. as for stock for stock GT v. EVO, i give it to the evo. MACH 1 v. EVO from a roll its a drivers race.
Click to expand...

was this a heavily modded eclipse....because i ran a spyder eclipse gt when i was even more stock than i am now and i spanked that thing badly
 
9

98laseredgt

New Member
Jul 16, 2004
122
0
0
indianapolis
Aug 2, 2004
#40
  • Aug 2, 2004
  • #40
this was a 1990 eclipse GSX with 3 inch turbo back exhaust, boost controller @19 psi, and upper intercooler pipe. stock 14b turbo.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
150
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 6, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Electrical Fuse 8, Light Green / Black Wire
  • bleedinggreen
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
437
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 26, 2025
bleedinggreen
B
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
458
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
871
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Electrical Issues with my 2006 mustang gt
  • VerneVdV
  • May 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
86
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech May 22, 2026
VerneVdV
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?