my dyno numbers..any good???
- Thread starter 96darkhorse
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
WhiteDevil
New Member
984.6gt
Founding Member
I would think a 302 with Longtubes would put down at least as much as a stock 99GT? Got any pics of the chart.
i have the print out chart....i wish i had pics of the chart but i dont....i dont know the exact reason why they shut off at 4800.... my rpm gauge is reading wrong.... the guy said that when his comp reached 4800rpm my gauge said 6000 rpms..... my oxygen sensors are causing my rpms to read higher... so my tach is off by like 1000 rpms
GTJake
Founding Member
You may see more power at a lower timing mark. Most dyno's show that stock headed cars make the most power at 14*. You should play with the timing on the dyno to see if you can find a difference. Get those O2's replaced and go back and play with that timing.
Jake
Jake
FastmanGT
Founding Member
Changing your O2s will not increase WOT power. When you hit WOT your computer goes straight to pre-programmed Air/Fuel/Spark tables. However, chaning your O2s will give you better gas milage and part-throttle response and power.
stang_gt_1994
Founding Member
I made max HP at 4800 RPM with about the same mods. Anything past 4800 and you won't make any more power with a stock H/C/I. BTW 984.6gt, do you ever have anything nice to saw about our 302's> I guess not.
WhiteDevil
New Member
Man how i wish i could get some LONG tubes. I know GTJake is makin more power than me and thats like our only difference. I hate those ****ty little BBk shorites.
stang_gt_1994
Founding Member
<html>
<head>
<title>-R-G-B-</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#000000" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<object classid="clsid
27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=4,0,2,0" width="100%" height="100%">
<param name=movie value="rgb.swf">
<param name=quality value=high><param name="SCALE" value="exactfit"><param name="BGCOLOR" value="#000000">
<embed src="rgb.swf" quality=high pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="100%" scale="exactfit" bgcolor="#000000">
</embed>
</object>
</body>
</html>
<head>
<title>-R-G-B-</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#000000" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<object classid="clsid
27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=4,0,2,0" width="100%" height="100%"><param name=movie value="rgb.swf">
<param name=quality value=high><param name="SCALE" value="exactfit"><param name="BGCOLOR" value="#000000">
<embed src="rgb.swf" quality=high pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="100%" scale="exactfit" bgcolor="#000000">
</embed>
</object>
</body>
</html>
StangJonGT
Founding Member
stang_gt_1994 said:
I have an aftermarket intake but Cam and Heads are stock and my Max output was just at about 5000 RPM so I agree w/ you on that one.
984.gt never has anything positive to say when he comes over in the 5.0 section, hes just a 4.6 troll. Gee you would think that a 98 GT would beat a 95 5.0 but its pretty apparent that the 96-98 4.6 motors were very underpowerd.
StangJonGT
Founding Member
Most '99-up dyno in the 225 range; the main difference is the torque here. Much more with the little 302.
Jon
Jon
Similar threads
