• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

My Ranger Is A Mustang At Heart! Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90Ranger302
  • Start date Start date Apr 25, 2005
9

90Ranger302

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
7
0
1
Apr 25, 2005
#1
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #1
Hey everyone I could use you input, since I am at best a novice.

I have a 1990 Ranger that I rebuilt the 302 in that I converted over three years ago. Here's the setup.

Stock bottom end

gt40p heads stage 1 port

Crower 15510 cam 212 duration .531 lift

1.7 Rollers

Aod tranny with TCI valvebody and 2600-2800 stall converter

570 Street Avenger Holley carb

Sanderson headers 1 1/2 primaries/ dual 2 1/4" pipes to converters / balance tube after converters / Flow Master Mufflers 40 Series / dual 2 1/2 pipes out the back

3.73 gears

This combo just does not seem as strong as what I thought it would be.
Timing is set at initial 10 degrees with 42 degrees coming in at about 2600 rpms.

Is it possible that the 1.7 rockers are giving to much lift should I go back to 1.6 rockers? Or is the carb not big enough, I have a 4160 also I did not think it would that much gas though.

Any thoughts ?

Thanks
 

Thenemesis

Member
Nov 16, 2004
321
0
17
chuckletown, sc
Apr 25, 2005
#2
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #2
DAMN thats like a wheelie pulling ranger lol very cool.. is it loud as hell? or sleeperish
 
9

90Ranger302

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
7
0
1
Apr 25, 2005
#3
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #3
The Flow Masters give it away now. It has a great tone!

I forgot to mention the intake is a Action Plus
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
52
Covington
Apr 25, 2005
#4
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #4
I'd check the compression and valve lash. Too tight of a valve lash and the motor will be lazy. Uneven compression will obviously lower the performance.

What benchmark are you using to say that it is not as strong as you thought it should be?

One more question. Positive traction or open diff? If you spin, you may not be pulling as hard as you should.

To directly answer two of your query: The carb is big enough. People tend to over carb and kill the responsiveness of the motor. The rockers should not be hurting your combo any.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
908
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
397
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
T
What's it Worth? 1979 Ford Mustang Cobra
  • toasterboy1
  • Nov 5, 2024
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
1K
What is it Worth?!?!? Sep 8, 2025
Noobz347
T
SOLD 1979 Ford Mustang Cobra Hatchback 302 C4 Modified
  • toasterboy1
  • Nov 15, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 20, 2025
toasterboy1
T
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?