• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

NA 306 as fast as 06 Roush?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fiveoho
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2006

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Sep 17, 2006
#1
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #1
picked up a mustang mag at walmart today and seen a shootout between a 06 vette and a 06 roush. vette makes 400 hp, roush makes 415. both cars ran mid to high 12's.

it blows my mind to see $45,000 cars with 400 horse run quarter mile times that a mild NA 306 combo will run. ive seen several 306 cars run high 12s....crazyness
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
Sep 17, 2006
#2
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #2
Yeah... they're stock and brand new. Built for comfort and speed and handling. As opposed to the 306 car.

That's like saying a Ferrari Enzo isn't worth $1mil because it "only" goes 11.1 in the 1/4. It's so much more than a quarter mile racer.

Not to mention you could modify those cars and see how they hold up against your modded 306.

Oh wait, there's a Lingenfelter C6 Corvette, with proper traction, able to achieve 9.0 @ 153mph. Is that better for you? 212mph comes up in 27.2 secs. Smoking the tires at 125mph in the 3-4 shift.

It does cost lots of money, but last time I checked, when you go to the dragstrip, they don't ask how much you spent on your car to make it fast.

Different strokes for different folks.
 

carbed87

Member
Jun 5, 2005
215
0
16
Sep 17, 2006
#3
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #3
not to mention poontang factors coming into play
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Sep 17, 2006
#4
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #4
Penguin said:
Yeah... they're stock and brand new. Built for comfort and speed and handling. As opposed to the 306 car.

That's like saying a Ferrari Enzo isn't worth $1mil because it "only" goes 11.1 in the 1/4. It's so much more than a quarter mile racer.

Not to mention you could modify those cars and see how they hold up against your modded 306.

Oh wait, there's a Lingenfelter C6 Corvette, with proper traction, able to achieve 9.0 @ 153mph. Is that better for you? 212mph comes up in 27.2 secs. Smoking the tires at 125mph in the 3-4 shift.

It does cost lots of money, but last time I checked, when you go to the dragstrip, they don't ask how much you spent on your car to make it fast.

Different strokes for different folks.
Click to expand...


all i was saying was that quarter mile times were very compareable. doesnt take a genius to figure out all the rest
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Sep 17, 2006
#5
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #5
carbed87 said:
not to mention poontang factors coming into play
Click to expand...

 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,026
1,617
194
NJ
Sep 17, 2006
#6
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #6
Here's the real factors, tires and weight.
Mags usually use regular tires for their tests, most here that run in the 12's NA use drag radials, there can be .5 in that alone.

The 05+ mustangs are pigs, great cars but far overweight.

The fox mustang, may be the best street/strip car in history, low wieght, lot's of torque.

But a ride in a new one, and you know why people would pay big money. Smooth, predictable, good ride quality.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Sep 17, 2006
#7
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #7
You dont need a HCI 306 to run that fast either... Theres a lot more than the number, thats the only reason they run similar times!
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Sep 17, 2006
#8
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #8
25thmustang said:
You dont need a HCI 306 to run that fast either... Theres a lot more than the number, thats the only reason they run similar times!
Click to expand...


true
 

bryce93lx

Member
Jan 20, 2006
88
1
19
Luke AFB AZ
Sep 17, 2006
#9
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #9
i will take my fox with suspension mods over a s197 everyday of the week, not really a preformance oriented suspension setup to start with and they weigh more than a sherman tank, $25,000 for a 4000 pound pig with 300 horse i think not
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Sep 17, 2006
#10
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #10
I have driven both a lot (brother owns and 06 and nearly every other family member has a fox) and can say its not just handeling and timeslips... If thats what you want, by all means get the fox, but theres wayy more to it than that. You can actually tell the car is stronger, stiffer and better built.

Its all in what someone wants. I wanted cheap speed and to be different, my brother wanted a new car (loved the new Mustang) and something that looked good and performed well!
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
Sep 17, 2006
#11
  • Sep 17, 2006
  • #11
bryce93lx said:
i will take my fox with suspension mods over a s197 everyday of the week, not really a preformance oriented suspension setup to start with and they weigh more than a sherman tank, $25,000 for a 4000 pound pig with 300 horse i think not
Click to expand...
It's not as bad as you think.

The Mustang GT only weighs 3500 lbs.

The Shelby GT500 convertible weighs 4000 lbs. With a base price of $46k and 500 hp.

The '40s M4 Sherman Tank weighs 56,000 lbs. With a base price of about $33k and 400 hp.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
567
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
K
Project Ideas (2006 S197)
  • Kitsune187
  • Apr 22, 2019
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2019
Kitsune187
K
J
351w swap in 2004 questions (set up like a 95 Cobra)
  • jonathansw1601
  • Mar 24, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2018
jonathansw1601
J
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?