• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Need a 69 Shaker Kit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pooley
  • Start date Start date Feb 26, 2008

Pooley

Member
Aug 19, 2007
60
0
6
New Orleans
Feb 26, 2008
#1
  • Feb 26, 2008
  • #1
Ok had anyone installed an after market shaker kit? If so what Brand and how good is the quality?

Next I have a 351W with the Edelbrock endurashine Performance RPM intake and a Endurashine 650 carb will one of the kits fit?
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Feb 27, 2008
#2
  • Feb 27, 2008
  • #2
The carburetor needs to stay at the same height as stock. The Performer, the Torker II and the C9OX Shelby intake are the only ones I'm aware of that have the carburetor at the stock height, and that's without a spacer. You can get by with a very thin spacer. I'm using a stock '70 428 spacer on a Torker II, and it's about as far as you can go.

Unless you're willing to modify the shaker base, it won't sit down on an Edlebrock/Carter style carb. It fouls on the sides.

The best 'glass reproduction by far is from Ram Air products in New York. He made all his molds from original parts, and they are application specific. They shaker scoop itself looks very nice, but the midplate just doesn't look like metal. He goes to Ford Carlisle every year. Nice guy. I believe he still has one up on e-bay you can check out.
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Feb 27, 2008
#3
  • Feb 27, 2008
  • #3
Is this it? I've been looking for this guy's stuff too.
http://www.fordramair.com/
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Feb 27, 2008
#4
  • Feb 27, 2008
  • #4
I bought an aluminium shaker and adapter(to the old style midplate) from karkraft with the though of fabbing up my own midplate and base in the future. The shaker is identical to the 03/04 mach 1s. It isn't exactly the same as the originals because the originals have smoother corners and the new one is kind of angular at the opening and the finish is a crinkle finish. Either way I think for both pieces it costed me 200 bucks but they are aluminium which I like better. I am running a performer RPM so I probably be stuck not being able to use the original 428 base and don't have the heart to cut one up to modify it.
Kevin
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Feb 27, 2008
#5
  • Feb 27, 2008
  • #5
BarnStang said:
Is this it? I've been looking for this guy's stuff too.
http://www.fordramair.com/
Click to expand...

Yep, that's it.
 

Pooley

Member
Aug 19, 2007
60
0
6
New Orleans
Feb 29, 2008
#6
  • Feb 29, 2008
  • #6
What next

Ok now I'm thinking about taking off the brand now intake and getting one of the three that will work. Now I've read that the holes in my hood for the turn signals will be out side of the cut out for the shaker, whats up with that?

If I get the new intake that is stock hight, how about my carb is it the same size as stock? Or will I need to change it too?

Well I guess you guys can tell that I really want a shaker I have one on my Lightning and really want one on the 69 (the one of the two that is supposed to have one)
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Mar 1, 2008
#7
  • Mar 1, 2008
  • #7
Pooley said:
Now I've read that the holes in my hood for the turn signals will be out side of the cut out for the shaker, whats up with that?
(the one of the two that is supposed to have one)
Click to expand...

That is correct the stock hood scoop is longer than the shaker scoop and the holes you are refering to are where the wiring for the turn siginals ran through. You will need to either find a shaker hood or a stock flat hood with no scoop. Then you will have to find a template and layout the hole on the hood and cut it out.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Mar 4, 2008
#8
  • Mar 4, 2008
  • #8
Pooley,

I should have qualified my response regarding the carburetor remaining at the stock height if you are using the correct 351W shaker base. All of the non 428 shaker bases are just modified 428 bases that have an added lip to increase the height and move the shaker for/aft to line up with the opening in the hood. The 351W base height is 6.14, while the 428 is only 5.5, so by using a 428 shaker base, you will gain an additional 5/8" clearance. It might be enough to work with your Performer RPM. The 428 bases are a lot more common and often cheaper than the 351W piece because there were a lot more of them made.
 

Pooley

Member
Aug 19, 2007
60
0
6
New Orleans
Apr 21, 2008
#9
  • Apr 21, 2008
  • #9
New intake

Ok I'm taking the really cool RPM Air gap and now going with a performer for the sake of the really really cool shaker. I guess I'll ebay the other intake.

I'm going with the Ford Ram .com kits I'm pleased with it look cool.

Has any one with a 69 used a glass hood? where did you get it? How good did it fit?
 

RFMustangGT

Member
Apr 4, 2005
294
0
16
Knoxville,TN
Apr 23, 2008
#10
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #10
are you still going with that endurashine finish on your intake? might want keep it in mind if your motor runs hot. I've had several people I have talked to that the endurashine holds in heat and seems to make their motors run a bit on the hot side. Just something to keep in mind.
 

Pooley

Member
Aug 19, 2007
60
0
6
New Orleans
Apr 23, 2008
#11
  • Apr 23, 2008
  • #11
Nope

No there is not one for the 351W only the standard finish thats why I used the Air gap in the first place ooh well.
 

Pooley

Member
Aug 19, 2007
60
0
6
New Orleans
Nov 3, 2008
#12
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #12
Rain

OK guys I have everything together now and I did get the
FordRamAir.com Home kit that was recommended and the guy is very cool, my thing is what happens when it rains? I looked on Ebay today at some NOS parts and they have a door to close it off and takes air from under the hood. It rain's here (New Orleans) all duh time and if I get trapped away from home I'll be suckin Water!!

I also have a gap at the rear of the shaker how do i fix this? washers? its a big gap and I really don't want to see any washers.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Nov 5, 2008
#13
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #13
Pooley said:
what happens when it rains? I looked on Ebay today at some NOS parts and they have a door to close it off and takes air from under the hood. It rain's here (New Orleans) all duh time and if I get trapped away from home I'll be suckin Water!!

I also have a gap at the rear of the shaker how do i fix this? washers? its a big gap and I really don't want to see any washers.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't worry too much about the rain. Not much will actually be ingested in the engine. My flapper is set up to open whenever the engine is pulling vacuum, and I've driven it in the rain with no problems. Most of the water will drain down the drain tube.

The midplate and the flapper are both available in reproduction (metal not fiberglass), but the midplate needs a lot of work to make it functional, and it doesn't fit or look as crisp as an original. Once it's installed however, it's hard to tell the difference.

As for the gap, you need to post some pics so we know what you're referring to.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 6, 2008
#14
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #14
it kind of sounds like you may need to find an angled carb spacer to fix the gap but like Gmachine said we realy need to see pics of the gap to know for sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
110
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
385
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
335
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
219
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?