• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Need help identifying this flywheel.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88 Fox GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2006

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Jun 21, 2006
#1
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #1
Back when I first did my 6 cylinder to V8 swap in my '65 coupe, I used a 1984 302 engine out of a Mercury which had TBI type of EFI on it (carbed afterwards). It was originally a 50oz balanced engine. I was told by a guy that said to make the 50oz engine work with a C4 tranny, I would need this special flywheel that he sold me. I'm pretty sure it's 28oz because I used a 28oz harmonic balancer and it worked fine. Is this thing really anything special or was he just feeding me full of ****?

How much would this thing be worth? I have no need for it anymore.

View attachment 461074
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Jun 22, 2006
#2
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #2
Someone's gotta know.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 22, 2006
#3
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #3
A new 50 oz C-4 flexplate ( not a flywheel) sells for about $100 from B&M . You cannot balance a 50 oz 5.0 with a 28 oz damper and flexplate. It just doesn't work that way. And ditto for using a 50 oz flex and damper on a 28 oz balanced engine
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Jun 23, 2006
#4
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #4
D.Hearne said:
A new 50 oz C-4 flexplate ( not a flywheel) sells for about $100 from B&M . You cannot balance a 50 oz 5.0 with a 28 oz damper and flexplate. It just doesn't work that way. And ditto for using a 50 oz flex and damper on a 28 oz balanced engine
Click to expand...
Well I did it somehow. The engine originally had the big 50oz balancer and I used this flexplate and a smaller 28oz balancer and it ran fine.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 23, 2006
#5
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #5
If it did, then it was a 28 oz balance engine to start with. There's a huge difference in the size of the counterweights on the crankshafts between the two. It is impossible to dynamically balance a 50 oz rotating assembly with a 28 oz flexplate/flywheel and harmonic balancer and vice-versa. If it was, then there would have been no need to market both.
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Jun 23, 2006
#6
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #6
The engine came out of a 1984 Mercury Grand Marquis. Would it have been 28oz balanced?

I do believe it had the large balancer, because I still have it in the garage. It is identical to the 5.0 balancer.

I guess I'm just trying to figure out exactly what went on when we put that engine in. I was only 14 then and didn't know much and that was 4 years ago.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 23, 2006
#7
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #7
88 Fox GT said:
The engine came out of a 1984 Mercury Grand Marquis. Would it have been 28oz balanced?

I do believe it had the large balancer, because I still have it in the garage. It is identical to the 5.0 balancer.

I guess I'm just trying to figure out exactly what went on when we put that engine in. I was only 14 then and didn't know much and that was 4 years ago.
Click to expand...
If it was the original engine, then it should have been a 50 oz motor. It could have been replaced by an earlier 302 though. The early 50 oz cranks weren't very good castings, I saw 2 that broke in half in stock applications, so it's possible that engine wasn't the car's first. The balancers look the same on the outside, but it's the size of the counterweight portion that makes the difference, ditto for the flywheel/flexplate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
526
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Most ridiculous / dishonest work you have heard a shop recommend?
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 19, 2026
  • Off-Topic Hangout
Replies
4
Views
133
Off-Topic Hangout Jul 20, 2026
SchwarzStock
N
Vibration issue
  • Nicolaj
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 8, 2024
AeroCoupe
Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
799
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?