• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech

NEED HELP W/BACKPRESSURE

  • Thread starter Thread starter ITFEEDS
  • Start date Start date Mar 4, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
I

ITFEEDS

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
19
0
0
Jacksonville Fl.
Mar 4, 2004
#1
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #1
I RECENTLY PUT A DUAL EXHAUST ON MY 2001 3.8 AUTOMATIC. I PUT MAGNAFLOWS WITH 2 1/4 PIPING WITH 3" TIPS. (CAT BACK) SINCE DOING THIS IT HAS BECOME SLUGGISH AT TAKE OFF. I DUNNO WHAT I CAN DO TO FIX THIS. THE SHOP I GOT IT DONE AT SAID THAT I GOT A YEAR TO BRING IN. BUT WHAT IS THE PROBLEM. I WANT TO KNOW THAT WAY I HALF WAY KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT WHEN I BRING IT TO THE M.
 

1kwik6

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
749
0
0
dallas
Mar 4, 2004
#2
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #2
How do you know it was something they did?That setup will only help you.Not hurt you.So I don't think that's the prob.
 
I

ITFEEDS

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
19
0
0
Jacksonville Fl.
Mar 5, 2004
#3
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #3
IT DIDN'T START....

WELL IT DID NOT START BEING SLUGGISH UNTIL RIGHT AFTER THEY PUT THEM ON I KNOW IT HAS GOT SOMETHING TO DO WITH BACKPRESSURE.I JUST NEED TO KNOW IF I SHOULD PUT 2" PIPE INSTEAD OF 2 1/4.ANYONE WITH DUALS ON AN AUTOMATIC 3.8 PLEASE RESPOND!
 
9

96redstang

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
42
0
0
Mar 5, 2004
#4
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #4
Back pressure is not your problem. i have 2.25 inch true duals on my 96 v6. I am not putting out the exhaust you are and i don't have any problems. Start checking basics. air filter, injectors, etc...
 
7

77sleeper

GO BUCS!
Founding Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,266
0
0
Napalm, AZ
Mar 5, 2004
#5
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #5
?
 

Attachments

  • caps.gif
    15.3 KB · Views: 286

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 5, 2004
#6
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #6
How much of the exhaust did you do? Changing the cat-back really won't effect low rpm exhaust scavanging.
What most people call "backpressure" is a miss conception. What you want is exhaust VELOCTIY. As you increase the diamter of the exhaust pipe, the exhaust gases start moving slower. You need to keep the velocity and momentum up to allow the previous pulse to draw out the next pulse. However, you can't go do small, because it can restrict flow at high rpm's.
I beleive that your problem is not related to the exhaust system. The cat back has very little effect on exhaust velocity at the header (because that is what is improtant ).
 

xneox

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
36
0
0
Mar 5, 2004
#7
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #7
Dude....sorry, but you're just gonna have to deal with it. I keep telling people that flow-through duals on a stock 3.8 are too much, but all I get is arguments.
bhuff30 has it right.....Not only do the gases move slower due to increased exhaust volume, but they cool down way too fast as well....cold air is heavier than hot air, and therefore slower-moving.....and that kills low-end torque. You may have gained HP on the top end, but your low end has suffered for it.
You can't compare it to a 96 because their stock numbers are way lower to begin with.
You can't have the best of both worlds without doing pretty major mods to your engine. If you want at least SOME of your low-end back, lose the Magnaflows. Go with a restrictive muffler, not an absorption muffler. You'll sacrifice some on the top end, but it'll still be better than stock. It'll sound better too, but that part's just my opinion.

Either that, or put a procharger kit on it. Woot!!!
 

GREENBIOCH

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,241
0
0
In an Igloo
Mar 5, 2004
#8
  • Mar 5, 2004
  • #8
Go out and get some gears now 3.73s. you won't be whining anymore, that will fix your problem and you keep the hp up top.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Mar 6, 2004
#9
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #9
screw teh 3.73 and get 4.30

auto craved for 4.30
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Mar 6, 2004
#10
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #10
Backpressure dosent exist.
 

GREENBIOCH

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,241
0
0
In an Igloo
Mar 6, 2004
#11
  • Mar 6, 2004
  • #11
CottonBurnerz said:
screw teh 3.73 and get 4.30

auto craved for 4.30
Click to expand...


Don't fear the gear
 
F

faststang_728

Founding Member
Jan 30, 2002
558
0
0
Greenbrier, WV
Mar 8, 2004
#12
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #12
i had straight pipes on my V6 for a week, (bad idea) and i lost a lot of low end power but gianed some top end.
 

GREENBIOCH

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,241
0
0
In an Igloo
Mar 8, 2004
#13
  • Mar 8, 2004
  • #13
I have straight pipes, I had no problem with losing low end trq, the difference was negligable. Although I want to try out some LT headers and X pipe.
 

xneox

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
36
0
0
Mar 9, 2004
#14
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #14
Reading the responses from different people and actually reading all of your sigs tells me something.
If you have a 98 or lower 3.8, don't expect the 99+ to act the same way when flow-thru duals are installed on an otherwise unmodified engine. 2 different animals. 150/215 vs 190/220 hp/tq. The loss may be more noticable.
If you have a 99+ with a boatload of other mods, don't expect an unmodded 99+ to act the same. More air in=the need for more air out.
 

peyotesands

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
119
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Mar 9, 2004
#15
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #15
xneox said:
Dude....sorry, but you're just gonna have to deal with it. I keep telling people that flow-through duals on a stock 3.8 are too much, but all I get is arguments.
bhuff30 has it right.....Not only do the gases move slower due to increased exhaust volume, but they cool down way too fast as well....cold air is heavier than hot air, and therefore slower-moving.....and that kills low-end torque. You may have gained HP on the top end, but your low end has suffered for it.
You can't compare it to a 96 because their stock numbers are way lower to begin with.
You can't have the best of both worlds without doing pretty major mods to your engine. If you want at least SOME of your low-end back, lose the Magnaflows. Go with a restrictive muffler, not an absorption muffler. You'll sacrifice some on the top end, but it'll still be better than stock. It'll sound better too, but that part's just my opinion.

Either that, or put a procharger kit on it. Woot!!!
Click to expand...

You are absolutely right. I have/am experiencing the same problem as the dude with the 2001. I have a 2000 auto and I noticed my ride is utterly dead at takeoff which is why my ETs have been high 17s. I have to deal with it for now because eventually I'll supercharge my mustang and then the duals will come in handy. for now it's all about the looks.
 

xneox

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
36
0
0
Mar 9, 2004
#16
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #16
peyotesands said:
You are absolutely right. I have/am experiencing the same problem as the dude with the 2001. I have a 2000 auto and I noticed my ride is utterly dead at takeoff which is why my ETs have been high 17s. I have to deal with it for now because eventually I'll supercharge my mustang and then the duals will come in handy. for now it's all about the looks.
Click to expand...


Supercharger

I'm just gonna go with either the MAC or the FRPP y-pipe quasi-dual kit. I figure that'll free up a little on the top end without killing a noticable amount on the low end. I also want to avoid the ricey sound that I've heard on many a Magnaflow soundclip.

If ever I decide to throw supercharger money into it....well.....I think I'll be able to afford an exhaust upgrade too.....
 

peyotesands

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
119
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Mar 9, 2004
#17
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #17
xneox said:
Supercharger

I'm just gonna go with either the MAC or the FRPP y-pipe quasi-dual kit. I figure that'll free up a little on the top end without killing a noticable amount on the low end. I also want to avoid the ricey sound that I've heard on many a Magnaflow soundclip.

If ever I decide to throw supercharger money into it....well.....I think I'll be able to afford an exhaust upgrade too.....
Click to expand...

Unless you're going to push a lot of power through that v6 it'll always sound "ricey" although I consider it just being a low power engine. The sound of an engine always gives away it's true power regardless of the cylinders. Anyways, what I was going to say is that if you get true duals then a CAI will definitely improve the sound of the exhaust. that's the one thing I instantly noticed after installing mine.
 

xneox

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
36
0
0
Mar 9, 2004
#18
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #18
peyotesands said:
Unless you're going to push a lot of power through that v6 it'll always sound "ricey" although I consider it just being a low power engine. The sound of an engine always gives away it's true power regardless of the cylinders. Anyways, what I was going to say is that if you get true duals then a CAI will definitely improve the sound of the exhaust. that's the one thing I instantly noticed after installing mine.
Click to expand...



Actually every y-pipe dual setup soundclip I've heard sounds much less ricey than true-duals.....most likely because w/true duals you're hearing 3 cylinders per pipe & with a Y-pipe you're actually hearing all 6 out of each.


From a supercharged performance standpoint I would think a good X-pipe or a pro-chamber would lessen the ricey sound when high-flow is required.
 
B

bjam2

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
94
0
0
Michigan
Mar 9, 2004
#19
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #19
I seem to have a problem like this also, its a 98 manual with 2 1/4 true dual exhaust and cats, i dunno the mufflers. It seems to hesitate for a second and then the RPM's jump up. I am gonna replace the muffs what kind should i get?
 

GREENBIOCH

Founding Member
Mar 22, 2002
1,241
0
0
In an Igloo
Mar 9, 2004
#20
  • Mar 9, 2004
  • #20
xneox said:
Actually every y-pipe dual setup soundclip I've heard sounds much less ricey than true-duals.....most likely because w/true duals you're hearing 3 cylinders per pipe & with a Y-pipe you're actually hearing all 6 out of each.


From a supercharged performance standpoint I would think a good X-pipe or a pro-chamber would lessen the ricey sound when high-flow is required.
Click to expand...


I get anything but comments about rice. In fact I have to tell people that it is a 6, which surprises many. I think it sounds ricey after 3000rpms and no matter what mufflers you get like it was said before, the motor gives itself away. Oh and an x pipe (in my opinion)will make it sound more ricey and more so if you get rid of your Cats. If you go straight thru keep your cats you will get a nice idle, I have yet to hear a sound clip that sounds like it does when your standing next to the car.

You can try and get any mufflers you want, the only difference I hear in sound is whether it is a chambered muffler or a straight thru design, chambered is louder and not as efficent performance wise(in theory), straight thru will be less loud(or more ricey as you put it) but breaths better, thats it in a nut shell.

I felt loss of low end power when I got duals, but highway driving was a bit more fun to do. Now that I have gears that insignificant loss of low end is so negligable that it really is not worth losing sleep over wether it is a pre or post 99 car.

Quote:
If ever I decide to throw supercharger money into it....well.....I think I'll be able to afford an exhaust upgrade too.....

Why Waste your money, Do it right the first time. Obviously your speaking from lack of experience here. How is letting your engine breath a bit better hurting performance again?? Your talking about exhaust temps going down and stagnant fumes in the exhaust system. Your not changing your headers or increasing the diameter of the pipes all the way thru the system, unless you want too for SC, turbo, or Nitrous. So how is a true dual system hurting performance, I don't understand your logic here??
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
329
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
200
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
B
I need help with an 06
  • boviske underwood
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • Services - Tuning, Welding, Mechanic, Body Work...
Replies
0
Views
498
Services - Tuning, Welding, Mechanic, Body Work... Oct 30, 2025
boviske underwood
B
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
819
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
188
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?