• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Need Some Assistance / Question Regarding New Heads And Rockers

  • Thread starter Thread starter DukeEntDotCom
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2015

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 8, 2015
#1
  • May 8, 2015
  • #1
Hey guys,

We are changing up things with my set-up and running into an issue.

Currently have the 96 explorer motor with the GT40 heads and TFS1 cam...

Well I got a set of AFR 165 heads (part 1472) and the shop I bought them from (East PA Foxbody) gave them to me with stud mounts installed and Harland Sharp rockers. He also gave me trick flow hardened pushrods 6.15" .080.

I also have a set of comp cams hardened rods stock length.

We already installed a TFS 2 cam as well.

When we tighten down the rockers with the push rod in place, the round part at the bottom of the rocker rubs against the bottom of the stud mount. We even took it over to a machine shop nearby as well to get his opinion, he said that they should not being doing this.

So if we hand crank the motor with the rocker tightened down, it won't turn all the way, but if we back the rocker bolt back a bit it will turn. We realized this as we were doing a clay test to determine we had enough piston valve clearance.

So not sure if we have the wrong bolt with the rocker. Called the guy I got the heads from and he said to get poly locks... Not sure if this is the answer or is something else going on? Is there something that the rocker sits on between the bottom of the rocker and the stud?

Here are a couple photos:
 

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 8, 2015
#2
  • May 8, 2015
  • #2
photos
 

Attachments

  • 20150508_161001.webp
    87.6 KB · Views: 222
  • 20150508_164932.webp
    74.3 KB · Views: 232

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
May 8, 2015
#3
  • May 8, 2015
  • #3
6.15" pushrods seem mighty short. Stock are 6.22 and with an aftermarket cam and rockers you would normally require longer pushrods. 6.4 - 6.5 is the normal range for inline aftermarket heads. I would recheck your pushrod length. Were these heads milled? Pedestal mount converted?

I've read problems with these rockers before as far as valve train geometry and know Woody at Ford Strokers and Ed Curtis at FTI avoid using them for this reason.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 8, 2015
#4
  • May 8, 2015
  • #4
^^^ what he said. Lol
 
Reactions: mikestang63

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 8, 2015
#5
  • May 8, 2015
  • #5
As Mike has stated, Harland Sharp rockers tend to be problematic for SBF's. They generally cater to GM products and as such are often set up to work with their valvetrain geometry.

I would demand that the shop that sold them to you exchange the rockers for another brand that work with Ford heads.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and mikestang63

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 8, 2015
#6
  • May 8, 2015
  • #6
Crane golds/Comp cams Ultras/FMS/or Scorpion rockers are my preference.
 

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 9, 2015
#7
  • May 9, 2015
  • #7
mikestang63 said:
6.15" pushrods seem mighty short. Stock are 6.22 and with an aftermarket cam and rockers you would normally require longer pushrods. 6.4 - 6.5 is the normal range for inline aftermarket heads. I would recheck your pushrod length. Were these heads milled? Pedestal mount converted?

I've read problems with these rockers before as far as valve train geometry and know Woody at Ford Strokers and Ed Curtis at FTI avoid using them for this reason.
Click to expand...
Thanks for all replies so far...

According to the shop I bought them from, They were converted to stud mount not milled just resurfaced for straightness
 

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 9, 2015
#8
  • May 9, 2015
  • #8
Here are some photos and a short video we made last night before closing the shop

View: https://youtu.be/3H9IO595_IA
 

Attachments

  • 20150508_173338.webp
    43.8 KB · Views: 253
  • 20150508_174537.webp
    29.7 KB · Views: 194
  • 20150508_174549.webp
    75.7 KB · Views: 211
  • ATT_1431122202638_20150508_164932.webp
    74.3 KB · Views: 213

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 9, 2015
#9
  • May 9, 2015
  • #9
Matt from East PA Fox (where I got these) said he's looking for another set of rockers to swap out with these.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 9, 2015
#10
  • May 9, 2015
  • #10
DukeEntDotCom said:
Matt from East PA Fox (where I got these) said he's looking for another set of rockers to swap out with these.
Click to expand...
Crane golds or comp cams ultra series work very well. Just an FYI. Also did you recheck your pushrod length?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
May 9, 2015
#11
  • May 9, 2015
  • #11
After you get the rockers sorted out, make sure you check clearances, the tfs stage 2 is not known to clear stock shortblock pistons.
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
May 9, 2015
#12
  • May 9, 2015
  • #12
2000xp8 said:
After you get the rockers sorted out, make sure you check clearances, the tfs stage 2 is not known to clear stock shortblock pistons.
Click to expand...
actually, from what i've been reading (been looking into the swap myself), with tfs heads it SHOULD work fine (should, because not every motor is exactly the same). not sure with the afr's though, as the tfs heads give a little more room for valve clearance.

maybe i'm missing something, but i dont see a pushrod installed in any of those pics or vid? the pushrod and valve stem are what hold a stud rocker up in the air, and with no pushrod the rocker is free to fall all the way down like that. that doesnt mean you're pushrods arent too short (very possible, stock is 6.25, and with an aftermarket cam, you probably need to go even longer) or the rockers arent the wrong ones, but it would help to see where it ends up when it's actually put all the way together so we can give you the right advice.
 
Reactions: liljoe07

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
May 9, 2015
#13
  • May 9, 2015
  • #13
Chuckman said:
maybe i'm missing something, but i dont see a pushrod installed in any of those pics or vid? the pushrod and valve stem are what hold a stud rocker up in the air, and with no pushrod the rocker is free to fall all the way down like that. that doesnt mean you're pushrods arent too short (very possible, stock is 6.25, and with an aftermarket cam, you probably need to go even longer) or the rockers arent the wrong ones, but it would help to see where it ends up when it's actually put all the way together so we can give you the right advice.
Click to expand...

Correct, also the guy in the video is wrong, you don't tighten the polylock all the way down. Once proper valvetrain geometry is established as well as pushrod length, the polylock is only tightened down enough to set lifter preload(If using a hydraulic lifter). Then the set screw is locked down.

But typically if the rocker is bottoming out on the stud, the pushrods are too short.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 9, 2015
#14
  • May 9, 2015
  • #14
Yes, when we did the video it was end of day and the pushrod wasn't installed... it was earlier when we initially tried things out.

What we realized is that the rocker arm nuts I have don't have that adjustable allen screw inside of them, so that's one thing. Also the rods I have I'm pretty sure are too short.

I have the Trick flow pushrod checker but we don't have the other tools to determine the length so I am gonna grab the comp cams checker that you can determine the length with the tool itself and you don't need a micrometer
 

Attachments

  • 20150509_125816.webp
    44.7 KB · Views: 209

DukeEntDotCom

New Member
May 9, 2010
9
0
1
NJ
May 10, 2015
#15
  • May 10, 2015
  • #15
Thanks for all the assistance and advice...

I also posted at one other place... Need Some Assistance / Question Regarding New Heads and Rockers

A good place for you four eyed Ford guys
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
918
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
T
Turning over fresh 347 stroker torque question
  • TexxDex
  • Apr 1, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2024
Bullitt347
Engine Rocker Noise after Aluminum heads and 1 piece CM Pushrods
  • 79pace
  • Apr 12, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 19, 2022
Monkeybutt2000
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?