• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

need suggestions on shortys for my 69/351w & aod

  • Thread starter Thread starter streetgrande69
  • Start date Start date Jan 10, 2004
S

streetgrande69

Founding Member
Nov 2, 2002
976
0
16
Splendora, Tx
Jan 10, 2004
#1
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #1
i'm gonna be putting a aod in my car and i want to go with shortys for headders. does anyone have any suggestions, warnings, or other. thanks
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Jan 10, 2004
#2
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #2
Try Hedman's 88-650. Either Jeg's or Summit carries them. I think those are the ones that Corpse has on his car.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 10, 2004
#3
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #3
mustang70 said:
Try Hedman's 88-650. Either Jeg's or Summit carries them. I think those are the ones that Corpse has on his car.
Click to expand...


those are the ones i have on my car too, the only complaint i have about them is that the 2 rear bolts on the driver side are a royal pain to get in, but other than that they fit really well. do yourself a favor and get either the copper or aluminum gaskets because i guarantee you won't want to change the cheap paper gaskets when they blow out. i would also have the collector flanges and the head flanges welded around the circumference for extra insurance, i wish i would have done that to mine, but i haven't had any problems so far, so i guess it's not critical. they are a drastic improvement over the stock manifolds for sure. if you can't afford the coated headers then at least have the painted ones sandblasted and paint them with VHT cast iron 1600* header paint, i did mine almost 2 years ago and they still look very good. pm me if you need anything.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Jan 10, 2004
#4
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #4
I've got Heddman shortys on a 302/AOD comb in my '70, and they fit perfectly, with no mods to steering or the tranny. I like them enough that when I go eventually go with a 351W, I'll get another set.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 10, 2004
#5
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #5
Not trying to talk you out of it but...why shorties instead of long-tubes? Is your car that low to the ground?
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Jan 10, 2004
#6
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #6
The AOD pan is a lot wider then the C4 of FMX. Not all of the long tubes will fit around it.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 10, 2004
#7
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #7
mustang70 said:
The AOD pan is a lot wider then the C4 of FMX. Not all of the long tubes will fit around it.
Click to expand...
I have pics of Headman longtubes on a 351W with an AOD on this page...

http://www.edbert.net/randp.htm
 
S

streetgrande69

Founding Member
Nov 2, 2002
976
0
16
Splendora, Tx
Jan 10, 2004
#8
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #8
i'm just contenplating the shortys. i want no suprises. i know shortys will fit with no probs.
edbert, i saw when you posted thoes pics before. really nice vert!!!!!!!!!!! also, it just looks too tight down there with full lengths. thanks for the suggestions.
i think i am gonna get the headmans, summit racing is only 119.00 for the black ones.
i can sand blast them at work also. thanks for the info Brian, you too Bob!
 
S

streetgrande69

Founding Member
Nov 2, 2002
976
0
16
Splendora, Tx
Jan 10, 2004
#9
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #9
well, actually, there is quite a bit of room under there. those are the elites, maybe.............
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Jan 10, 2004
#10
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #10
Yet another item I have sitting brand new in the box that I will not longer be using LOL

Yeah those headmans look good and recomend them for a budget. But there is nothing like the JBA's or the 1 3/4 anderson shorties I plan on getting, which I almost got till someone showed up and bought them hours before I got to the place grrrrrr.
 
B

bswor

New Member
Nov 10, 2003
65
0
0
Jan 11, 2004
#11
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #11
I have a 1969 coupe, im guessing their pretty similar. But i have a 351c in mine so i installed the long tube. Brought it to a muffler shop one of the pipes had to be bent around. I wasnt able to use shortys. I used hooker competition headers. Not sure if this helps you decide or not.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 11, 2004
#12
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #12
streetgrande69 said:
well, actually, there is quite a bit of room under there. those are the elites, maybe.............
Click to expand...
After seeing longtubes take ~20 hours to install in a 2001 WS6 I would say yes, there's PLENTY of room in there

The only place it is tight is where it gets near the underbody bracing that is only an issue with a convertible. I say it is tight but not so tight as to cause any real problem, although I'll have to use an H-pipe since it does make an X-pipe too difficult.
 

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Jan 11, 2004
#13
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #13
so which are better? shorties or long tube? im not sure which i should get but i wanted to put an x-pipe with them, would they fit? on a 72 302?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 12, 2004
#14
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #14
triostang said:
so which are better? shorties or long tube? im not sure which i should get but i wanted to put an x-pipe with them, would they fit? on a 72 302?
Click to expand...
Long tubes are generally a little better for performance (everything else being equal of course) but the long ones will take away some ground clearance. Not much of an issue unless your car is lowered more than the typical 1-2 inches though. The clearance issue on my car is BEHIND the headers, and that will only happen on convertibles since their underbody is quite different. Your 72 with a 302 should not have any problems with putting an X-pipe on it.
 

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Jan 12, 2004
#15
  • Jan 12, 2004
  • #15
thanx it really helps....so i'll go with long tubes then since im not lowering my car but the front springs do lower it 1" so im guessing its not a problem
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
326
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
164
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
217
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
3
Autolite 3925 discontinued?
  • 387lx
  • Jan 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
276
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2026
Mustang5L5
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
919
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?