• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Need to Build A 450 HP 289

  • Thread starter Thread starter cherrypony93
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2004
C

cherrypony93

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
49
0
0
Sep 18, 2004
#1
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #1
I have a 289 I need to build. I would like to get 450 - 500 HP out of her. Naturally apirated with no power adder. Can any one provide a parts list to help me out. The block is sitting here untouched. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Cherrypony93
 

2nd Mustang

Founding Member
Feb 24, 2002
2,488
0
46
Southern California
Sep 18, 2004
#2
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #2
Not quite a 289, but you get the idea?

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2004/08/HighOnCarbs/index.php
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Sep 18, 2004
#3
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #3
naturally aspirated?
 

golf4283

Active Member
May 30, 2003
1,253
1
39
Orland Park, Illinois
Sep 19, 2004
#4
  • Sep 19, 2004
  • #4
I dont know if its realistic to want that much horsepower from such small cubes. Maybe with a nice stroker kit and a nice set of heads you will get it but from what I have seen 289's dont like to perform all that well without some help from a supercharger or turbo.
 

69fb00GT

New Member
May 26, 2004
117
0
0
Southwestern PA
Sep 20, 2004
#5
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #5
cherrypony93 said:
I have a 289 I need to build. I would like to get 450 - 500 HP out of her. Naturally apirated with no power adder. Can any one provide a parts list to help me out. The block is sitting here untouched. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Cherrypony93
Click to expand...


Stud girdle/ARP hardware/Forged Crank/Lightweight Rods + pistons/huge heads/huge solid roller/huge intake/huge carb/awesome ignition/and lastly...HUGE RPMS
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Sep 20, 2004
#6
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #6
What 69fb00gt said.

Why this particular number?
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 20, 2004
#7
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #7
My guess is you need a 289 for a vintage racing class. The easiest way to do it with a guarantee is to buy one already built. Cobra Automotive probably has the most experience building race prepped 289s.

Otherwise, you can spend up to $15k with no guarantees your combination will work. To build that kind of power means you have to check tolerances with everything. You could spend $1,000 just on micrometers and tools to make sure you build is flawless.

I'll add to 69fb00GT a lightweight knife-edged steel crank and lightweight valvetrain (titanium if available). Basically keep everything that moves as light as possible. You get the idea.

Also, if you have to bore the block, keep it a .010 to .020. You will want to retain as much strength in the cylinder walls as possible at such high RPMs. You will also need a zero deck height and shaved heads and/or domed pistons to get the high compression you will need.

Here is a quick build sheet

Race Prep Block and rotating assembly: $1,250
Lightened Steel Crank: $1,500
CP Custom Forged Pistons: $1,000
Carrillo H-Beam Forged Rods: $1,600
Custom Heads (Victor Jr. Minimum): $2,000+
Custom Cam and Valvetrain (Mechanical, Titanium Valves): $1,500
Oil System and Cooler: $750
Radiator and Cooling: $750
Aluminum Flywheel and Driveshaft: $750
Intake and Carb: $1,000+
Fuel System: $500+

13.5:1 - 15:1 Compression Ratio
7,500 - 8,000 RPM Range

Definitely need a drivetrain to support!
Definitely need big brakes to stop!

$0.02
 
C

cherrypony93

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
49
0
0
Sep 20, 2004
#8
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #8
Max Power said:
What 69fb00gt said.

Why this particular number?
Click to expand...

I just want something different. I have a 1993 Mustang Coupe. The body is flawless. I have had it stored since 1994. I have gutted the car trying to get it weighed in at 2500 lbs. With a nice light weight motor like the 289 it should be a screamer.
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Sep 20, 2004
#9
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #9
Good Luck.

Is that 450 at the flywheel or rear wheels?
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 21, 2004
#10
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #10
cherrypony93 said:
I just want something different. I have a 1993 Mustang Coupe. The body is flawless. I have had it stored since 1994. I have gutted the car trying to get it weighed in at 2500 lbs. With a nice light weight motor like the 289 it should be a screamer.
Click to expand...
If weight is a concern, you can build the same power with a stroked 5.0 for less than half the price and the same weight. It will also give you a ton of low end torque which you would not have with the 289. In addition, the 289 build will require racing fuel.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Sep 21, 2004
#11
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #11
cherrypony93 said:
I just want something different. I have a 1993 Mustang Coupe. The body is flawless. I have had it stored since 1994. I have gutted the car trying to get it weighed in at 2500 lbs. With a nice light weight motor like the 289 it should be a screamer.
Click to expand...

Yeah, a 289 block weighs exactly the same as a 5.0 block.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Sep 21, 2004
#12
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #12
If you want light and fast, I feel using a 289 would be a waste. All that heavy block and you're only using 289 CIs of it. You could stroke it to 331 or 347 and keep the same weight, and make much more safe power. Then again, if power to weight is what you want, going to the 351W block with a 427 or 408 stroker would be better.

Seriously, you could build a streeter 351 to go nuts at 8000rpm, it might be a little grumpy, but our country's got lots of screamers. A lot of them are Clevelands.

It would probably cost 1/2 as much to get 450 out of a 351, even a 302 stroker. Oh, and with the money you save on the stroker over the 289 buildup, you could put it towards an aluminium Dart 302 block, and save another 100lb.

69fb00GT mentioned a girdle, don't forget girdles for the valvetrain. If you want to go all out, titanium valve, retainers, and locks. TWM Induction has nice IR fuel injection manifolds, and High Performance Coatings can finish off the thermal efficiency of your donk with oil-retentive coatings for mains and rod bearings, piston skirts, heat barrier stuff for piston crown, exhaust ports and the combustion chambers. I can email you a text file of insane all-out, over-engineering ideas if you want.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Sep 21, 2004
#13
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #13
here's another form fordmuscle, it was built for vintage racing where they require cast non-roller rockers, and apparently factory iron heads. This is a hgih dollar build, but it shows what can be done, heads only flow 220 on the intake, power peaks at 7000rpm.

http://www.fordmuscle.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=24304&forum=16&12
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Sep 21, 2004
#14
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #14
302 coupe said:
here's another form fordmuscle, it was built for vintage racing where they require cast non-roller rockers, and apparently factory iron heads. This is a hgih dollar build, but it shows what can be done, heads only flow 220 on the intake, power peaks at 7000rpm.

http://www.fordmuscle.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=24304&forum=16&12
Click to expand...
Wow! I and I thought my $15k build was a stretch. $40k is some serious dinero. However, I just talked with a friend of mine that had $4,500 into a lightened steel crank so I see how the numbers can get that high.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Sep 21, 2004
#15
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #15
yeah it gets expensive to turn that kind of rpm on a regular basis. I think the average Joe could build a 450 horse 289, with an occasional high rpm blast in mind, for around 6k. A good balance job, steel crank, and good rods make for a sturdy bottom end for 450-500 hp. 302 blocks(and I imagine 289 blocks also) start splitting around 500hp, so it would be wise to upgrade to one of the lower model motorsport or dart blocks, they handle 500 hp well and fairly affordably. AFR185's, healthy solid roller cam, and a victor intake with a 750dp, I think 450hp would be realistic. It would be a dog until 4000 rpm though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
1965 289 xmission
  • sctang
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
198
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 30, 2025
Mcmahst
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
83
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
H
1966 mustang starter and pulley troubles
  • Hotrods4ray
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
368
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 10, 2026
Realmongo
CJ Pony Parts Customer Build - Dan's 1967 Mustang Convertible
  • CJPonyParts
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
216
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 18, 2025
CJPonyParts
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?