• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

need to know how to get 400hp out of 351w?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 70stanger
  • Start date Start date Jul 15, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

92LX_Stroker

New Member
Aug 3, 2006
22
0
0
Where ever the Army puts me
Aug 8, 2006
#41
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #41
Wow, I would have to say that it took me a while to read all this.
Anywho, I currently have a 92 with a 347. I am trying to buy a 66 and drop it in their. I have a x303 cam, 750 holley, dual plane intake, forged bottom end. I was interested in reading about the AFR heads. I was considering going with the 185 ported, pedestal mount. What is the recommendation from this group? It will be a daily driver, no real strip or racing applications. No AC/ Heater either.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
64
St Paul
Aug 8, 2006
#42
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #42
185 would be a great head for you, provided you have valve clearance.
 

92LX_Stroker

New Member
Aug 3, 2006
22
0
0
Where ever the Army puts me
Aug 8, 2006
#43
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #43
Max Power,
I cant remember if my pistons were cut for valve clearance or if it wasnt needed. Is their any way to tell before I pull the heads, or should I just pull them and have a good look? The heads on there now are 351W heads that had a bigger valve job done. I believe it was 2.02 and 1.60 that was done.
Or would I get about the same performace if I just had the 351W heads ported and polished???
Bare 185 heads run about 1200 bucks but no clue on a port/polish job for the 351W.
Any help appreciated.

GO ARMY
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
64
St Paul
Aug 8, 2006
#44
  • Aug 8, 2006
  • #44
I would be surprised if you had 2.02s in factory castings. Usually that is too big.

Aftermarlet heads will pretty much outflow any amount of porting you can do on factory heads. Usually aftermarket heads with 2.02/2.05 intakes will require pistons designed for that. The only way to tell for sure is to bolt a set on and do the clay test for interference. Unfortunately, you can't return heads that have been bolted on.

Safest bet is AFR 165s with 1.90 intakes, or Performer RPMs with 1.90 intakes. Both are capable of impressive power. I have the 1.90 RPMs on a 393 and they flow enough for my needs.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
736
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
912
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
N
New Edge 3.8L Forged Internals
  • NtheGAME
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
777
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
349
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
975
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?