• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Negative Wedge Kits for 67?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Snail50
  • Start date Start date Apr 16, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
S

Snail50

Founding Member
Mar 24, 2001
787
0
0
Miami
Apr 24, 2004
#41
  • Apr 24, 2004
  • #41
anyone know about Global West's kit? It seems like their UCA is shorter than stock.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Apr 25, 2004
#42
  • Apr 25, 2004
  • #42
The tubular uppers are re-angled. Not sure if they are shorter or not. Best to ask them.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Apr 25, 2004
#43
  • Apr 25, 2004
  • #43
66stangmeister said:
well, since everyone's talking about these negative wedge kits....I've seen this template deal on eBay, so u know where to drill the new holes in the shock tower. Is that basically all there is to it? or is there another thing u have to do? in addition to moving the upper control arm down and back little bit.
Click to expand...
The template alone is probably for the 1" Shelby drop. Most of this discussion is regarding the 1 3/4" drop that requires you to reangle the upper ball joint to keep it from binding and ripping out the suspension.

As for the e-bay templates. If you have to spend more than $10 it isn't worth it. Specs are availabe on the web and you can easily make one yourself if you have a drillpress and some metal. I did my first one with a paper template I and some precise measuring.
 

66stangmeister

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
226
1
0
Lafayette, LA
Apr 25, 2004
#44
  • Apr 25, 2004
  • #44
oh, so is the 1 3/4" drop alot better than just the 1" shelby drop? cuz i'd like to do this one day, but don't want to spend a whole lot. Is the 1" drop good enough or is the 1 3/4" drop better for what its worth?
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Apr 26, 2004
#45
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #45
Please don't lower your upper a-arms without having modified upper a-arms.
with stock a-arms you'll bind the ball joints and can cause the a-arms to shear...it kinda ruins your day.

Global west a-arms are built damn well, my first stage was wedges, second was tcp now I have both for sale! please pull up globalwest.net and read their reasons for not having adjustable a-arms it makes sense

My tcp system binded up {on their behalf I didn't have my shocktower support panels on} and the right upper failed at the heim joints tcp replaced the heim joints on the right side.

I wish that someone smarter than I would make a system that would take some of the brake dive out of the car that would be a great step forward...JB
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Apr 26, 2004
#46
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #46
66stangmeister said:
Is the 1" drop good enough or is the 1 3/4" drop better for what its worth?
Click to expand...
Good enough??? Tough question... The 1" Shelby drop is an improvement and it is free (other than labor). But the 1 3/4" drop with negative wedge (or new/modified arms) is even more of an improvement, coming much closer to ideal, but it also costs $$$ as you'll need to buy the wedge kit or new arms. The 1 3/4" drop is better (my car definitely feels more stable and focused in turns), and I certainly think its cost effective if you need/want improved handling.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 26, 2004
#47
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #47
I still think that if the new (NPD item #3082-3G) upper control arms are shorter and the ball joints are angled down and in, that this would take the place of relocating the upper control arms from the stock location and still provide the negative wedge effect. I called NPD and as always no one their could verify this or who makes the new arms. Go figure?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Apr 26, 2004
#48
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #48
DarkBuddha said:
Good enough??? Tough question... The 1" Shelby drop is an improvement and it is free (other than labor). But the 1 3/4" drop with negative wedge (or new/modified arms) is even more of an improvement, coming much closer to ideal, but it also costs $$$ as you'll need to buy the wedge kit or new arms. The 1 3/4" drop is better (my car definitely feels more stable and focused in turns), and I certainly think its cost effective if you need/want improved handling.
Click to expand...
Does this apply to '65 and 66 only? I've heard that '67 and '68 have a different setup. Is 1 3/4" too much for them?

How about '69 and '70? I'm going to do a drop on my '70, and I'd rather drill one new set of holes, rather than two. And I'm planning on modifying or having my upper arms modified. With the amount I get to drive the car, regular inspections shouldn't be a problem.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Apr 26, 2004
#49
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #49
Hack said:
Does this apply to '65 and 66 only? I've heard that '67 and '68 have a different setup. Is 1 3/4" too much for them?

How about '69 and '70? I'm going to do a drop on my '70, and I'd rather drill one new set of holes, rather than two. And I'm planning on modifying or having my upper arms modified. With the amount I get to drive the car, regular inspections shouldn't be a problem.
Click to expand...
First, Pro-motorsports is probably the best place to contact with these questions, since they originated the negative wedge kit. That said, as far as I am aware, dropping the upper control arms is functional on all years. Again, the maximum amount of drop possible while avoiding balljoint binding is 1" (aka the Shelby drop). This is true with all years.

The 1" drop will provide some improvement, but even more of a drop will provide even more improvement (near ideal from what I understand), which is why the negative wedge kit (as well as modified/re-engineered upper arms) was developed. The maximum drop possible with the negative wedge kit is different for different years. I believe the negative wedge allows for 1.5" drop on '65-'66, and 1.75" on '67-'70. For specifics, visit Pro-motorsport's site and get it directly from the source.

As for a '70, I did the 1.75" drop with the Pro-motorsports negative wedge (as the included directions and templates indicated). It is definitely best to only drill one set of holes. If you do the 1" first, you won't be able to drill the 1.75" holes later... not enough material.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Apr 26, 2004
#50
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #50
huey, the arms you are talking about are global west products and yes the geometry is improved somewhat but you still have to drill new holes IIRC. might check out GW's website http://www.globalwest.net/mustang_1964 -73 catalog.htm#Tubular upper control arms
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 27, 2004
#51
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #51
I am sooo confused! The arms I looked at in the NPD booth at the 40th and in the 2004 NPD catalog do not look like the Globel West arms at the end of your link. I also thought all Globel West products had their logo applied to their parts and these did not. NPD also said that these were made from a new company they are going to start using. It's a mystery I guess?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 27, 2004
#52
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #52
Maybe it is time to call up NPD and clear up your confusion....I'm sure everyone is curious.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Apr 27, 2004
#53
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #53
well the picture in their "online catalog" shows a GW arm or at least a very good copy of it, only diff i could see is that that part number is for a chrome arm and a all of the GW arms i've seen are black, i thought it might be a new option, anyway if it's not GW it's an almost exact copy, going by the pic in the catalog anyway
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 27, 2004
#54
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #54
How much is the NPD arm?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Apr 27, 2004
#55
  • Apr 27, 2004
  • #55
I'm pretty sure it is the GW arm....I just looked at the catalog.
 

BobV

20+ Year Stangneter
May 18, 2003
474
0
16
Leavenworth, KS
Apr 28, 2004
#56
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #56
Be careful! NPD is selling knock-off tubular arms that are NOT Global West. They are made by Blue Moon instead. While they look very similar, the pivots are rubber, not the Del-a-lum (upper) or uniball (lower).
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Apr 28, 2004
#57
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #57
...nevermind...
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 28, 2004
#58
  • Apr 28, 2004
  • #58
Thanks BobV for clearing up this issue. I thought I was loosing my mind. I did call NPD and they are trying to pass these arms off as Globel West products.
 
S

Snail50

Founding Member
Mar 24, 2001
787
0
0
Miami
Apr 30, 2004
#59
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #59
After much research, I went with the Global West Negative Roll UCAs from Mustangs Unlimited. It seems that the Shelby Drop and Negative Wedge kits, while very effective, don't really introduce true negative camber; rather they reduce overall positive camber due to the length of the stock UCA, and still do not produce "optimum" supension geometry. If I'm wrong in my interpretation, please let me know...although the order is already placed ~

I should have them within a week, at which time I will also install my M+ steering kit.

Now that 65fastback2+2 hooked me up with the program to shrink my digital pics (works great, btw...thanks!), I should be able to post pics of the install.

have a great weekend, all!
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Apr 30, 2004
#60
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #60
Snail50 said:
After much research, I went with the Global West Negative Roll UCAs from Mustangs Unlimited. It seems that the Shelby Drop and Negative Wedge kits, while very effective, don't really introduce true negative camber; rather they reduce overall positive camber due to the length of the stock UCA, and still do not produce "optimum" supension geometry. If I'm wrong in my interpretation, please let me know...although the order is already placed ~

I should have them within a week, at which time I will also install my M+ steering kit.

Now that 65fastback2+2 hooked me up with the program to shrink my digital pics (works great, btw...thanks!), I should be able to post pics of the install.

have a great weekend, all!
Click to expand...

I'm sure Global West parts designed from scratch for the car are going to be better than a cobbled fix of old parts. I would buy them too if I had the money lying around.

Let us know how the car drives!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
128
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
113
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
F
1990 mustang GT, essentials to making a 5,000 mile round trip (Michigan to California, and back)
  • FreeMustangProject
  • May 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
868
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 14, 2025
hoopty5.0
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
781
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?