- Mar 12, 2004
- 54
- 0
- 0
is there really a 64 1/2 stang? cause i heard that on their vin it has a 5 in there year. therefore, how many of us who thinks we hae a plain 65 could really have a 64 1/2??
Not to mention the "minor" engine differences, 170 I-6 and 260 V-8 in the "64 1/2" and the 200 I-6 and 289 V-8 in the "65"!oboebrian said:Also the hood corners and headlight buckets were different also (amoung other minor things).

ya...and look what they did in '74.......re-dressed the Pinto to look "Mustang-ish"!Ozsum67 said:Now guys, if it's good enough for Ford, why not accept it? I mean, just because they ran out of Falcon parts and all...............

65stanger said:ya...and look what they did in '74.......re-dressed the Pinto to look "Mustang-ish"!
![]()

Yeah. Don't tell Mustang II owners they have a pintostang. They don't like it too much.65stanger said:ya...and look what they did in '74.......re-dressed the Pinto to look "Mustang-ish"!
![]()
t_chelle16 said:Yeah. Don't tell Mustang II owners they have a pintostang. They don't like it too much.
-Chelle
t_chelle16 said:Yeah. Don't tell Mustang II owners they have a pintostang. They don't like it too much.
-Chelle
