NEW 4.6 Intake Manifold! Purplemustang!

M

MoNsTaMaCk24

Founding Member

Aug 12, 2002

742

0

0

Shippensburg, PA

Jun 10, 2004

#1

• Jun 10, 2004

• #1

Thread!!!

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=492322

Pictures!!!

http://www.corral.net/photopost/sho...t=2&thumb=1


I LIKE A LOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Price is fair too!!! More people the cheaper also!!!

 

J

Joel's98GT

New Member

Jan 3, 2004

368

0

0

central OH

Jun 10, 2004

#2

• Jun 10, 2004

• #2

Don't go jumpping for joy just yet, still no dyno number on it.

 

M

MoNsTaMaCk24

Founding Member

Aug 12, 2002

742

0

0

Shippensburg, PA

Jun 10, 2004

#3

• Jun 10, 2004

• #3

I know... Thats the only thing I am waiting for... If it is comparable to RR... and mmmmm boost happy!!!

 

D

DrK MrK iV

New Member

Jan 11, 2004

271

0

0

Charlotte

Jun 10, 2004

#4

• Jun 10, 2004

• #4

From what I can tell... Upper plenums will work with this? It is just a lower manifold, correct?

 

J

Joel's98GT

New Member

Jan 3, 2004

368

0

0

central OH

Jun 10, 2004

#5

• Jun 10, 2004

• #5

DrK MrK iV said:

From what I can tell... Upper plenums will work with this? It is just a lower manifold, correct?

Click to expand...

yes

 

M

MoNsTaMaCk24

Founding Member

Aug 12, 2002

742

0

0

Shippensburg, PA

Jun 10, 2004

#6

• Jun 10, 2004

• #6

When dyno numbers come back keep in mind what plenum and throttle body was used on hp gains...

 

D

DrK MrK iV

New Member

Jan 11, 2004

271

0

0

Charlotte

Jun 10, 2004

#7

• Jun 10, 2004

• #7

Ah ok. I wonder what the gains will be? Nitrous used have to be happy about this. Plastic intakes and nitrous just dont mix in my book.

 

Slapyo

Admin Dude

Feb 8, 2003

1,069

1

49

Anaheim, CA

Jun 10, 2004

#8

• Jun 10, 2004

• #8

here is a link to the pics, the first one didn't work.

http://www.corral.net/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=2&thumb=1

 

H

HIGDON

New Member

Nov 2, 2003

241

0

0

Ft. Hood, TX

Jun 10, 2004

#9

• Jun 10, 2004

• #9

Sweet deal, hope it works out.

 

G

GinoGT

Founding Member

Aug 11, 2002

1,862

0

36

Jun 10, 2004

#10

• Jun 10, 2004

• #10

Hopefully that thing will perform.........because it sure as hell doesn't have looks going for it.

And with the basic cube shape, I would really be worried about fuel puddling for nitrous users.

 

M

MoNsTaMaCk24

Founding Member

Aug 12, 2002

742

0

0

Shippensburg, PA

Jun 11, 2004

#11

• Jun 11, 2004

• #11

looks a lot better than that p-51 thing or whatever it is... Bullit is sharpe and so is RR... BBK needs to get off their "Back Sides" and get theirs out but I dont think that will be til fall.... or winter... or... 2052.... WE SHALL SEE!!!

 

Dark Knight GT

I can't get it up......ok that didn't sound right.

May 26, 2003

3,653

2

56

Ozark, Missouri

Jun 11, 2004

#12

• Jun 11, 2004

• #12

I'm curious about this as well. On a n/a vehicle, I don't see much gains. Seriously, even if you manage to port and polish the inside to smooth out flow, still, since it's made of metal, its going to heat up which goes back to the whole issue of "hot air vs. cooler air" and "metal intake material vs. plastic". However, I'm not going to knock the guys work. I say give it time and lets see what results it gets. Forced induction vehicles, however, might be a different story.

 

LS2 KLR

Member

Apr 16, 2003

452

0

17

Houston, TX

Jun 11, 2004

#13

• Jun 11, 2004

• #13

I'd buy it just for reliability issues. I'm actually looking for a stock intake so when/if mine blows up I won't be without a car for too long.

 

J

Joel's98GT

New Member

Jan 3, 2004

368

0

0

central OH

Jun 11, 2004

#14

• Jun 11, 2004

• #14

GinoGT said:

And with the basic cube shape, I would really be worried about fuel puddling for nitrous users.

Click to expand...

my thoughts exactly