• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Clutch

  • Thread starter Thread starter somnium
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2012
S

somnium

New Member
Oct 2, 2012
5
0
1
Oct 15, 2012
#1
  • Oct 15, 2012
  • #1
I just put a new clutch in a 1992 mustang gt. It's a King Cobra. My question is about the clutch pedal tension. It seems quite a bit easier to push down that it did before. Feels like a hydraulic clutch, but it's mechanical. Clutch seems to work fine, though it grabs pretty hard. Is there any reason why the clutch pedal pushes down so easily as compared to before? Any help would be appreciated.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Oct 15, 2012
#2
  • Oct 15, 2012
  • #2
Each clutch is different. Also, a bad clutch cable can make it more difficult to press, so if you replaced your cable, that may be a reason it feels easier. As long as it engages and shifts fine, I wouldn't worry about it. What clutch was in it before?

Joe
 
S

somnium

New Member
Oct 2, 2012
5
0
1
Oct 15, 2012
#3
  • Oct 15, 2012
  • #3
It was the stock clutch. I didn't replace the cable neither. All that was new was the clutch, pressure plate, flywheel, and the bearings.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 17, 2012
#4
  • Oct 17, 2012
  • #4
Is it adjusted properly?
Does it engage and disengage at the same pedal height as before?

If the answers are 'yes', then you should be fine.
 
N

Nateliano Fresgriki

New Member
Oct 18, 2012
1
0
1
Kansas City, MO
Oct 18, 2012
#5
  • Oct 18, 2012
  • #5
I had the same thing when I changed my clutch. I think the key to "feel" is when your leg goes pretty much straight as you push the pedal down....if your clutch is out of adjustment, or worn, the displacement of your pedal and your leg position/angle is different and that's why I think a new clutch feels better on your foot. Strange reply here maybe, but I used to work in ergonomics in my machine design days and this was an issue with the sewing machines we designed.
Do you think I'm crazy here?
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Oct 22, 2012
#6
  • Oct 22, 2012
  • #6
Everytime I replaced a clutch I've either used a Center Force, Auto parts store replacement and I used a Spec Stage 1. They all had the same pedal feels. IMO...the auto parts store clutches and the Spec Stage 1 grabbed much harder than the Center Force. Those cars banged gears much harder.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 23, 2012
#7
  • Oct 23, 2012
  • #7
SVT32VDOHC said:
Everytime I replaced a clutch I've either used a Center Force, Auto parts store replacement and I used a Spec Stage 1. They all had the same pedal feels. IMO...the auto parts store clutches and the Spec Stage 1 grabbed much harder than the Center Force. Those cars banged gears much harder.
Click to expand...

The CF is designed to operate softer until you lay into it and cause the counterweights to add pressure to the clutch disc.
Easier on parts and the pedal feel to me was softer. A CF is never 'grabby', nor does it chatter.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Oct 26, 2012
#8
  • Oct 26, 2012
  • #8
ratio411 said:
The CF is designed to operate softer until you lay into it and cause the counterweights to add pressure to the clutch disc.
Easier on parts and the pedal feel to me was softer. A CF is never 'grabby', nor does it chatter.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I liked both centerforces I used. 3 of em actually.

Two were in supercharged cars (95 GT with a 12lb Procharger and HCI) & a (96 Cobra with Vortech). Both were good, til the one in the 96 Cobra stopped disengaging. Disc looked great, but the PP must have gone bad.

The 3rd one was in a stock 91 notchback. Thing worked perfect. It was overkill for the car but I wanted a good one in there in case I ever upgraded engine parts, which never happened. lol
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Oct 27, 2012
#9
  • Oct 27, 2012
  • #9
Seems to me that the CF would be good on parts too.
It doesn't hit so hard on engagement, so parts might not suffer so much.
Just a thought. I have been mulling over the whole weak T5 thing, and this came to mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Severe Drivetrain Shaking
  • KeithM412
  • Jul 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
263
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 29, 2025
AeroCoupe
P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
142
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
191
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
S
  • Locked
Drivetrain Adjustable clutch cable questions
  • Scott_S
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
387
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Saturday at 3:39 PM
427nostang
4
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?