• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New DD - 2006 GTO

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChromdOutDubs
  • Start date Start date Aug 5, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Aug 13, 2007
#41
  • Aug 13, 2007
  • #41
As far as I know, the Marauder won't be back anytime soon. I wonder will Ford release a more powerful, v8 version of the Taurus.

Darkwriter77 said:
I guess all the dudes out here are driving the lesser versions of the GTO's, then, because every GTO I've seen around town has those goofy both-on-one-side outlets.
Click to expand...
I'm seeing more and more GTOs in my area lately. The 04's can be had for a couple thousand over a low mileage 04 GT. I've seen a few in the 18-19k range. I actually see more 05s because even they sell for a very decent price. The single-side exahust tips were probably among the first things they changed (pushed an already uninspiring design well into the region of Bland City). A decent bargain but I would gladly save a few more pennies for the 05.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Aug 14, 2007
#42
  • Aug 14, 2007
  • #42
jcw88 said:
looks like a high priced grand am
Click to expand...

And our foxes look like Escorts and were mostly unchanged for 14 years. I agree that they could have done something more with the GTO, but it's not bad.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Aug 14, 2007
#43
  • Aug 14, 2007
  • #43
I rode in a 5.7L GTO, I thought it rode excellent. I liked the seats too. The only thing, is like the Vette, the seats wear very quickly! I wish they would have made the GTO a retro car. Friend of mine has a 66 GTO that he has owned his whole life. He is much older than me and he has his life savings in it. The motor made over 700ft lbs of torque on the chassis dyno. It's a beast.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Aug 14, 2007
#44
  • Aug 14, 2007
  • #44
I would drop my fox in a second for a new GTO. Sorry to say it...but those motors are amazing! Not to mention you have a 12 second bone stock highway screamer...AS A DAILY DRIVER! And im sure it gets better gas mileage than most cars on this forum, mine included! Nice pick man!
 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Aug 17, 2007
#45
  • Aug 17, 2007
  • #45
blackened88lx said:
And our foxes look like Escorts and were mostly unchanged for 14 years. I agree that they could have done something more with the GTO, but it's not bad.
Click to expand...


LOL how true........................................ how true

I applaud GM for keeping the pushrod alive.

They built the ultimate new factory engine IMO. Who wouldn't want an all aluminum 427 dry sump arrangement?

How agile would the GT500 be with that sort of set up?

Then, the fox guys would go nuts to swap that engine into their cars.
 

Doc GTO

Member
Oct 23, 2004
610
0
16
Ocala, FL
Oct 29, 2007
#46
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #46
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
I would've rather seen real Holdens over here instead of one with GTO stuck to the fenders. IMO you just can't take a foreign car and try to put a name and a legacy on it that belongs to an automotive legend.


BUT, they are nice cars and the engines are impressive. There's a guy around here with one that's cammed out and sounds pretty nasty.
Click to expand...

You mean like my black Monaro:

 

Attachments

  • BMWsig.webp
    10.7 KB · Views: 210

black87ttop

Member
Oct 29, 2007
43
2
8
burlington,new jersey
Oct 29, 2007
#47
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #47
These new gto's are such a disgrace to the classic, i absolutely hate them. I cant believe they would take such a legendary name and slap it onto a car that has no meaning, resemblance, or ties to an american tradition. Its a real shame and is ultimately why the car failed in our market and will be axed. Its too bad cause they could have really had a hit with it. But they took an australian car which had nothing to do with pontiac and put a name on it that was legendary, hoping it would sell. Wait till you see what happens when the challenger comes out, Dodge took the name challenger, built a car that was very fitting and overall looked just like the original with a new modern twist. This is a car that will take off and did the original car its justice.



 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Oct 29, 2007
#48
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #48
Don't you know that's the new trend in car manufacturers, all across the board? Resurrect an old nameplate, give the car just a few styling hints to make it vaguely resemble the exterior of the original namesake (perhaps to someone legally blind, looking at it from 50 feet away), then give it a so-so engine, make it REALLY heavy, load it full of stupid luxury options that nobody really wants/needs in a muscle car, and then price it out of the reach of everyone except spoiled rich kids or weathy retirees desperately clinging to the memories of their youth.

The only one I've seen ANY company get halfway right is Ford with the '05+ Mustang ... and even that they kind of managed to screw up a bit, IMO (kinda pricey, heavy, too cushy, tacky interior). At least it's selling really well, it's pretty quick, and there's already a huge aftermarket for it. But now they're talking about putting out a "new" Mustang in 2010, which means to me they're going to take something that isn't broke and try to "fix" it...

At least with the GTO, they kept it RWD and a V-8, and having 400 horses on tap ain't all too shabby, either ... even if the car IS pretty blah in the looks department, and it weighs about as much as your average Lincoln.

So ... how's it holding up after a few months?
 

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Oct 29, 2007
#49
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #49
Darkwriter77 said:
Don't you know that's the new trend in car manufacturers, all across the board? Resurrect an old nameplate, give the car just a few styling hints to make it vaguely resemble the exterior of the original namesake (perhaps to someone legally blind, looking at it from 50 feet away), then give it a so-so engine, make it REALLY heavy, load it full of stupid luxury options that nobody really wants/needs in a muscle car, and then price it out of the reach of everyone except spoiled rich kids or weathy retirees desperately clinging to the memories of their youth.

The only one I've seen ANY company get halfway right is Ford with the '05+ Mustang ... and even that they kind of managed to screw up a bit, IMO (kinda pricey, heavy, too cushy, tacky interior). At least it's selling really well, it's pretty quick, and there's already a huge aftermarket for it. But now they're talking about putting out a "new" Mustang in 2010, which means to me they're going to take something that isn't broke and try to "fix" it...

At least with the GTO, they kept it RWD and a V-8, and having 400 horses on tap ain't all too shabby, either ... even if the car IS pretty blah in the looks department, and it weighs about as much as your average Lincoln.

So ... how's it holding up after a few months?
Click to expand...

Its great! Love every second of it. I have the GTO for my DD and my Mustang for the track, great combo!

-AJ
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Oct 29, 2007
#50
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #50
congrats on the new car, very nice...my brother in-law has one and I love the power, the looks have oddly enough decended on me though as far as exterior goes, interior is very nice though. He recently went 13.0@108 bone stock to the paper filter...6 speed of course.
 

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Oct 29, 2007
#51
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #51
1Bad89Coupe said:
congrats on the new car, very nice...my brother in-law has one and I love the power, the looks have oddly enough decended on me though as far as exterior goes, interior is very nice though. He recently went 13.0@108 bone stock to the paper filter...6 speed of course.
Click to expand...

Was he running the stock tires, or some MT or summin like that? How was the weather when he ran...

I went 13.7 bone stock, on stock street tires on a very hot day and it didnt seem like i would be able to get much more out of it. I also only had 500 miles on the car!

-AJ
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Oct 29, 2007
#52
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #52
ChromdOutDubs said:
Was he running the stock tires, or some MT or summin like that? How was the weather when he ran...

I went 13.7 bone stock, on stock street tires on a very hot day and it didnt seem like i would be able to get much more out of it. I also only had 500 miles on the car!

-AJ
Click to expand...

A lot of cars actually perform better once they get a few thousand miles on 'em. Dunno how it translates into horsepower differences, exactly, but my mum's '05 Nissan Sentra was getting some HORRIBLE gas mileage when she first bought it new "out of the box" - around 21 MPG highway with granny-style driving. However, with over 12k on the clock now, it's getting somewhere around 32 MPG or so on the highway.
 

Doc GTO

Member
Oct 23, 2004
610
0
16
Ocala, FL
Nov 5, 2007
#53
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #53
ChromdOutDubs said:
Was he running the stock tires, or some MT or summin like that? How was the weather when he ran...

I went 13.7 bone stock, on stock street tires on a very hot day and it didnt seem like i would be able to get much more out of it. I also only had 500 miles on the car!

-AJ
Click to expand...

The factory tune will not let you have full power (timing restrictions) until 2500 miles on the clock. Best thing to do is once you have that milage on it, reset the fuel trims and take it back to the track for a true baseline.

I just ran a new best of 10.86 at 132 in my LS1 GTO.
 

cervinistang

New Member
May 7, 2007
11
0
0
Dearborn, Michigan
Nov 5, 2007
#54
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #54
89five.o said:
Nice car. While the styling isn't quite as nice as the Holden I'm glad they're bringing them over here. Next up is this



Looking like This
Click to expand...

EEEWWW

i really very much dislike 4-door sport cars. just me...
 

Attachments

  • holden-ve-commodore-1.webp
    34.8 KB · Views: 123
  • 2008_pontiac_g8-thumb.webp
    10.4 KB · Views: 114

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Nov 5, 2007
#55
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #55
Doc GTO said:
The factory tune will not let you have full power (timing restrictions) until 2500 miles on the clock. Best thing to do is once you have that milage on it, reset the fuel trims and take it back to the track for a true baseline.

I just ran a new best of 10.86 at 132 in my LS1 GTO.
Click to expand...

What are fuel trims? And i just set a new best on mine this Friday, 13.3 @ 103, and that was me shifting from 1st to 3rd on accident. I think i can go 13.0's bone stock like the other dude said.

-AJ
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
721
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
P
New to StangNET
  • Popeye1790
  • Apr 19, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
903
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2024
Popeye1790
P
K
Electrical charging issue
  • knucklehead11
  • Jul 15, 2024
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
888
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 16, 2024
Mcmahst
7
The Death of a Cobra II
  • 76_Cobraii_mustang
  • Oct 2, 2023
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Oct 3, 2023
2Blue2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?