• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

New dyno results.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eos
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Eos

Oh Heather Oh yeah... I want your pink taco
Jun 13, 2003
734
3
0
oklahoma
Jan 7, 2006
#21
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #21
Cool Wheels said:
That's interesting. For those us that bought the automechanics for dummies book, what diagnostic tool would enable one to adjust to those exact specs? Or because of the RPM curve would that only be something you could do in a shop during a dyno test? And do you have to convert weight to mass by removing the gravitational coefficient?

Megan: Just curious about the effect of the cam on your gas mileage? And your signature just kills me - is that Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy?
Click to expand...
Yeah its Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy. The cam did bring down my gas mileage. But I really don't notice that much because I don't drive it as much anymore. It seems to be getting better since I got it tuned, and if its running rich looks like I could get better mileage!
 

Cool Wheels

New Member
Jan 26, 2004
103
0
0
Nelson, BC, Canada
Jan 7, 2006
#22
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #22
Stupid question anyway. That's what happens when you type faster than you think

What I really meant was how much fuel to power improvement because I have plans too. You got 11hp with potential for more with adjustments. I didn't read which cam you put in. Was it loepy or mid?

I've been thinking about headers right off the bat but I figure that I want to just hit a bunch of things at the same time since I'll probably end up pulling the engine. Maybe I'll do my gears first but that's cashflow related too. I'm just waiting for the lucky lottery ticket! Oh saving is hard...

 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jan 7, 2006
#23
  • Jan 7, 2006
  • #23
Cool Wheels said:
And do you have to convert weight to mass by removing the gravitational coefficient?
Click to expand...


If it would serve a purpose.


Later edit: I just realized that in a ratio type calculation weight would give you the same result as mass (effect of gravity would be divided out on both sides of the equation) so you could use either. That's just what everyone was dying to know right?!
Click to expand...


Such a fuss over a caveat.
 

Eos

Oh Heather Oh yeah... I want your pink taco
Jun 13, 2003
734
3
0
oklahoma
Jan 8, 2006
#24
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #24
Cool Wheels said:
Stupid question anyway. That's what happens when you type faster than you think

What I really meant was how much fuel to power improvement because I have plans too. You got 11hp with potential for more with adjustments. I didn't read which cam you put in. Was it loepy or mid?

I've been thinking about headers right off the bat but I figure that I want to just hit a bunch of things at the same time since I'll probably end up pulling the engine. Maybe I'll do my gears first but that's cashflow related too. I'm just waiting for the lucky lottery ticket! Oh saving is hard...

Click to expand...
Its a Crane energizer cam .484 lift and I think 216 dur. It's pretty mild but the car sounds a lot better then before and sometimes it lopes a little at idle or when you're driving slow through a parking lot it will hop a bit. I really can't go under about 10 mph without my foot on the clutch.
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
Jan 8, 2006
#25
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #25
Eos said:
I really can't go under about 10 mph without my foot on the clutch.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you need some 4.10s!
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Jan 8, 2006
#26
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #26
216 degree cam on a stock exhaust Mustang II? Yup, HEADERS! You may also find that when the headers go on, they may lean the carb out right into the ballpark where it needs to be.
 

Eos

Oh Heather Oh yeah... I want your pink taco
Jun 13, 2003
734
3
0
oklahoma
Jan 8, 2006
#27
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #27
Realmongo said:
216 degree cam on a stock exhaust Mustang II? Yup, HEADERS! You may also find that when the headers go on, they may lean the carb out right into the ballpark where it needs to be.
Click to expand...
Will have to do that
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Progress Thread LTD-ing
  • OX1
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
391
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 6, 2026
OX1
O
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
745
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
309
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
619
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
392
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?