• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Edelbrock heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1990Coupe
  • Start date Start date Jul 16, 2010

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Jul 16, 2010
#1
  • Jul 16, 2010
  • #1
Edelbrock 5025 Edelbrock E-Street Cylinder Heads


Well they are "new to me" sub 1k and aluminum. Do they look decent?? Has anyone run them??

Small-Block Ford


Specifications:

Chamber Volume: 60cc
Deck Thickness: 5/8"
Valve Spring Diameter: 1.25"
Max Lift: .550"
Valve Spring Installed Height: 1.750"
Rocker Studs: 3/8" with Guide Plate
Pushrod Diameter: 5/16"
Intake Port Volume: 170cc
Intake Valve Diameter: 2.02"
Exhaust Port Volume: 60cc
Exhaust Valve Diameter: 1.60"


Flow Numbers as tested by Edelbrock's SuperFlo SF-1020 flow bench @ 28" H2O
Valve Lift .100" .200" .300" .400" .500" .600" .700"
Intake 65 121 174 216 242 249 -
Exhaust 42 92 130 150 162 168 -


I have a cobra intake, stock everything else. These sound nice for me (and my budget )
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 16, 2010
#2
  • Jul 16, 2010
  • #2
I've heard that they are decent heads, but designed strictly for mild street builds. IIRC, they have "soft" valve springs that don't handle revving much past 5500, and the spring perch is machined so that swapping to better/bigger springs wouldn't be easy or cheap. I can't quote dyno numbers, but you can see from the flow numbers that they flow just a little bit less than TFS 170s.

On a side note, I always find it funny when cylinder head manufacturers quote flow numbers for their assembled heads at higher valve lift than what the included valve springs can handle. I suppose you could always change the valve springs and run a bigger cam, but for assembled heads it is kind of misleading.
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Jul 16, 2010
#3
  • Jul 16, 2010
  • #3
I had planned on doing a mild street build, something to compliment my Cobra intake. So a Cam thats not too aggressive, and heads to match up well with the intake. I'm going to have 3.55's installed soon, so with a mild head/cam upgrade over the winter it should move pretty well.

I wonder if i should spend the extra 3-400 beans and just go Trick Flow.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jul 16, 2010
#4
  • Jul 16, 2010
  • #4
trickflow
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jul 17, 2010
#5
  • Jul 17, 2010
  • #5
1990Coupe said:
Edelbrock 5025 Edelbrock E-Street Cylinder Heads
Click to expand...

Performance should be comparable to the GT40X's.
 

russ1979

Member
Oct 6, 2006
152
0
16
albuquerque, new mexico
Jul 18, 2010
#6
  • Jul 18, 2010
  • #6
what is gt-40x performance like then?
 

Beasty306GT

Active Member
Dec 19, 2002
671
4
28
Oxford,Mass
Jul 19, 2010
#7
  • Jul 19, 2010
  • #7
go with the trick flow heads
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jul 19, 2010
#8
  • Jul 19, 2010
  • #8
russ1979 said:
what is gt-40x performance like then?
Click to expand...

Somewhere in between that of the GT40P's and the Edelbrock 60379's. Middle of the road in other words.
 
R

ROCUN

New Member
Mar 20, 2009
14
0
0
Jul 20, 2010
#9
  • Jul 20, 2010
  • #9
A good head for the money. Run your cobra intake,tfs stage 1 cam, and these heads should be at least 300rwhp. If you have the money the afr165 or 170 trickflow would be better. But nothing wrong with these if you on a tight budget.
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Jul 21, 2010
#10
  • Jul 21, 2010
  • #10
Thanks for the reply rocun!

I think i may just save up for a tfs1 cam and tf170's. Probably the better way to go. I want something to last a while and be a great NA combo.
 

russ1979

Member
Oct 6, 2006
152
0
16
albuquerque, new mexico
Jul 21, 2010
#11
  • Jul 21, 2010
  • #11
1990Coupe said:
Thanks for the reply rocun!

I think i may just save up for a tfs1 cam and tf170's. Probably the better way to go. I want something to last a while and be a great NA combo.
Click to expand...

that may be a good idea. in my 30 years of life i have found that it is always a good idea to do it right the 1st time rather then pay for it twice.
 
R

ROCUN

New Member
Mar 20, 2009
14
0
0
Jul 21, 2010
#12
  • Jul 21, 2010
  • #12
I run a cobra intake,afr165s,and tfs stage1 car was 326rwhp and about same rwtq a good improvement over stock and very streetable. Then added s-trim blower 454rwhp and still very streetable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
781
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?