• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

New issue of M&F (Ring brothers and JBA)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Edbert
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
www.edbert.net
Mar 8, 2006
#1
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #1
Anyone get the new issue yet?

I'd like to hear what folks thought of the newest creation of the Ring Brothers. As well as thoughts of Jay's '68 tunnel-port vintage-racing coupe.
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
www.pacific-motors.com
Mar 8, 2006
#2
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #2
my autoparts store had the issue on the counter and I flipped through it and saw the euro looking fastback. that thing was HOT! I really dug the interior and the carbon fiber rear valence plus the 18 and 19" wheels. The thing turned out real well.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
62
Medina,Tennessee
Mar 8, 2006
#3
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #3
Too "retro" for me, but they are very talented guys.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Mar 8, 2006
#4
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #4
i saw it 5 months ago at SEMA, cant get any cleaner.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
53
Seattle & Tampa
Mar 8, 2006
#5
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #5
This may be a topic better suited for the Talk forum (since we have it). That said, I'm a fan of the Ring Bros. car, and the JBA car is an oldy but a goody. You might also spy another article on the Ring Bros. car in last month's PHR (or was it Hot Rod?).
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
www.edbert.net
Mar 8, 2006
#6
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #6
I'd never question their talent, or the "cleanness", but something about their aesthetics bother me. On the 67 (maybe was a 68, ya really cannot tell) fastback though I think they went too far. Many of the things that i like so much were not just modded, they were removed. The square things hanging off the front valence and many of the doo-dads seem sort of glued on as afterthoughts. The rectangular exhausts and whatever those things that replace the air extractors are just don't seem to add anything other than be different. The interior has almost everything that looks like a classic mustang removed and replaced by something more spaceship/euro like.

Again, amazing skill and fabrication work at every level, very high marks on originality and creativeness too...it just doesn't leave a positive impression on me. I can still appreciate that they are pushing the envelope, and the show car scene seems to prefer their type of mods to what SN65 did, but I prefer Bob's approach.

Now Jay's car?

THAT'S what I like in a restomod, mostly business and totally retro!

ETA: What is this "talk forum" you speak of? <BFG> Did anyone notice FRPP is going to start making Boss302 blocks again?
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Mar 8, 2006
#7
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #7
The Ring brothers demonstrate once again that Wisconsin winters are verrrrry long. Those guys need to do a mock up using Elmer's glue, then pull off half the stuff they put on a car and call it done.

The vintage racer is everything cool. I wonder how well it works on a road course, though. The gas pedal on a 302 ci engine with 450 hp @ 7300, a 12.5:1 CR, a 273/283 .640" cam, dual 615 cfm Holleys, 1 3/4 into 3 1/2 headers, and 2.12/1.60 tunnel port heads would feel more like an on/off switch than a throttle.
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
Mar 8, 2006
#8
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #8
I liked the car better than the last two they did. One of them had the headlightd distorted at an upward angle and kinda made the car look, challenged, so to speak.

I love the billet hood hinges. I called and talked to Jim Ring about 2 months ago about purchacing a set. They were $599 through them. Now they sell for $650 through Mustangs plus.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
www.cardomain.com
Mar 9, 2006
#9
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #9
I tend to agree with Edbert on this one. Ring Bros are obviously very talented and skilled and approach things with their own originality, but it's just not my taste. The front valance air vents just don't look right on the car and remind me of what Chevy put on the SS pickup, which they happen to look very good on. After reading the article and really looking the car over, it seems to me that they are looking to develop a line of aftermarket parts for classic cars. As you pointed out, many of these parts are bolted/mounted on the car. Their previous cars seem to have taken a different approach where mods were more subtle because they were carefully blended in and not so obvious. My guess is you will begin to see more than just the hood hinges (which totally rock) available from Ring Bros. You too could have your very own billet cowl covers and Euro air extractors for your classic ride. You won't see them on my ride anytime soon though...
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
www.edbert.net
Mar 9, 2006
#10
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #10
jcode68 said:
You too could have your very own billet cowl covers and Euro air extractors for your classic ride.
Click to expand...
Those look like they bolted on a set of dual-quad spacers to me. And the flat tail-light panel bugs me, carbon fiber or not. I was starting to feel a bit queasey with the liberal use of the ricer "R" all over their cars, but then I figured it stood for "Ring" and cut them some slack
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 9, 2006
#11
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #11
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Mar 9, 2006
#12
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #12
Edbert said:
I'd never question their talent, or the "cleanness", but something about their aesthetics bother me. On the 67 (maybe was a 68, ya really cannot tell) fastback though I think they went too far. Many of the things that i like so much were not just modded, they were removed. The square things hanging off the front valence and many of the doo-dads seem sort of glued on as afterthoughts. The rectangular exhausts and whatever those things that replace the air extractors are just don't seem to add anything other than be different. The interior has almost everything that looks like a classic mustang removed and replaced by something more spaceship/euro like.

Again, amazing skill and fabrication work at every level, very high marks on originality and creativeness too...it just doesn't leave a positive impression on me. I can still appreciate that they are pushing the envelope, and the show car scene seems to prefer their type of mods to what SN65 did, but I prefer Bob's approach.

Now Jay's car?

THAT'S what I like in a restomod, mostly business and totally retro!

ETA: What is this "talk forum" you speak of? <BFG> Did anyone notice FRPP is going to start making Boss302 blocks again?
Click to expand...

I could not agree more.


Edbert said:
Those look like they bolted on a set of dual-quad spacers to me. And the flat tail-light panel bugs me, carbon fiber or not. I was starting to feel a bit queasey with the liberal use of the ricer "R" all over their cars, but then I figured it stood for "Ring" and cut them some slack
Click to expand...

That “R” stands for rice because that is all I could think of when I was looking at the car. What a way to end it after living a proud life of 39 years
 
S

Steve69

Member
May 11, 2005
233
0
16
Mar 9, 2006
#13
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #13
I use to live 5 Minutes from the Ring Brothers and Never new that they
had Mustang Projects until I opened up the M&F magazine. There place
looks like a Bodyshop that you would see in any small town. I can vouch
for the Cold Weather in Wisconsin. Heat wave today its going to be
50 degrees.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
www.edbert.net
Mar 9, 2006
#14
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #14
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
Click to expand...





















Or try this, the car's official website.

I should probably mention, I like everything under the hood, including the hood
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 9, 2006
#15
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #15
Ehhh, it's okay. I am not discrediting the hard working and creativity that went into it, I just don't dig it. The wheels are too large, the interior just doesn't look right either.
 

SN65

Member
Oct 27, 2004
540
1
18
Chicago, IL
Mar 9, 2006
#16
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #16
Hi All,

I had the oportunity to meet the Ring brothers at the Detroit Autorama. Two of the nicest guys you will ever meet.

They spent about an hour going over the SN65 at the show. They were very complimentary. In fact, they told Wayne that the SN65 was better than anything they ever built. They said that our car (the SN65) has raised the bar for every custom mustang yet to come.

I only wish I could have taken them for a ride. Seeing the car is one thing, but riding in it is a surreal experiance.

Bob
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Mar 9, 2006
#17
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #17
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
Click to expand...












These pix are from a Popular Hot Rodding feature on the Bittle Trans Am car, and the Ring Bros '67 fb was a feature car in the January '06 Hot Rod. I've been on the fence about renewing my Mustang & Fords subscription, which expires June '06. If Mustang & Fords is just going to recycle Mustang feature cars from other Primedia mags that I also subscribe to, and that have a lot higher level of editorial content, it's going to be a lot easier to make the call on M & F.
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Mar 9, 2006
#18
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #18
180 Out said:
These pix are from a Popular Hot Rodding feature on the Bittle Trans Am car, and the Ring Bros '67 fb was a feature car in the January '06 Hot Rod. I've been on the fence about renewing my Mustang & Fords subscription, which expires June '06. If Mustang & Fords is just going to recycle Mustang feature cars from other Primedia mags that I also subscribe to, and that have a lot higher level of editorial content, it's going to be a lot easier to make the call on M & F.
Click to expand...
I have been having the same problem between Mustangs Monthly and Mustangs and Ford. I seams like they just recycle the same articles from one to the other and it is getting worse not better. If this trend has not stop by the time my subscription comes due I will cancel one if not both of them.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
62
North Carolina
Mar 9, 2006
#19
  • Mar 9, 2006
  • #19
I cancelled all because of this and just pick up a newstand issue if something new is in it; maybe twice a year.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Mar 10, 2006
#20
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #20
Now that Trans-Am coupe is freaking awesome.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
694
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 23, 2026
All Stock93
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
769
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
324
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?