Yeah I was going to tell you to run 24's when I re-read this thread yesterday, but figured I was too late. I should have caught it the first time I read it and it might have saved you from wasting your time with the 19's and stock pump.
It's running.. Ended up having to upgrade the fuel system.. 24's and a bigger fuel pump.
Now go run it see what it runs!!!!!
It's never gonna make it to the dyno... I love reading these kind of threads when there is closure. threads like this, how much power then no closure suck. Strap the car to the dyno and quit making excuses.
Whoops sorry about that, I read that early in the morning. Must have missed it, well than thanks for actually putting it on the dyno and posting your results.I took it to the dyno at Steeda and posted my results, man! Take a look up a couple replies. I said I didn't know if/when I'd be taking it to the track.
Whoops sorry about that, I read that early in the morning. Must have missed it, well than thanks for actually putting it on the dyno and posting your results.
I have heard that mustang dyno's actually read lower than a dyno jet. I have never experienced this though. I have used a dynapak and a dynojet. But the dynapak was not calibrated properly. So I got bad numbers..and no refund.. My old car, basically explorer motor with a stock 88 cam made 260 285 on a dynojet.
^^Now those number are more like it. I have a very similar setup to yours, 306, eddie RPM, TFS stage 2 cam, eddie perfomer heads w/ 2.02in/1.6ex, long tube headers. Hoping to make the same numbers you are.
What issues did you have to work out to free up the extra HP?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?