• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter sl03gt
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Dec 8, 2009
#21
  • Dec 8, 2009
  • #21
Gearbanger 101 said:
Alright....now that its the day after, I just reread some of my last post and although I still stand by the points I've made, it probably came off a little more sarcastic than it needed to be. Sorry folks.
Click to expand...

Don't apologize...you pretty much hit it on the head.

Now, if you meant to post this apology in the thread about the Viper engine in the SN95, then you should apologize.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 8, 2009
#22
  • Dec 8, 2009
  • #22
Oh, I would also like to say that the gauges in the SN are also much better. Interior looks better too. But whatever, I'm not going to change your mind, so what's the point. I'm 5' 7", practically a midget, but I have had plenty of friends who were 6' plus and never complained about the head room in their Mustang. The S197 is a big ugly car, and it could wipe my ass for me, I don't care. I don't buy muscle cars to be more complicated.

Kurt
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 8, 2009
#23
  • Dec 8, 2009
  • #23
revhead347 said:
Oh, I would also like to say that the gauges in the SN are also much better. Interior looks better too. But whatever, I'm not going to change your mind, so what's the point. I'm 5' 7", practically a midget, but I have had plenty of friends who were 6' plus and never complained about the head room in their Mustang. The S197 is a big ugly car, and it could wipe my ass for me, I don't care. I don't buy muscle cars to be more complicated.

Kurt
Click to expand...

So nothing really to add then?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 8, 2009
#24
  • Dec 8, 2009
  • #24
No, not really. What's the point. 400hp Mustang in 2010, that's cool.

Kurt
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 8, 2009
#25
  • Dec 8, 2009
  • #25
i like the new mustang very much, and i love the idea of having a 30 mpg 300 hp motor in it, even if it is just a v6. i bet it still makes for a very fun daily driver. and you guys probably know me well enough by now to know that i am all about driving my car on the street and not the track. that sounds like a car i could and would drive every day.

i could even see myself in one of them (a vert of course) if i have the money in a few years. if that means i'm an old fart now, so be it
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Dec 9, 2009
#26
  • Dec 9, 2009
  • #26
BlackVert;8078881 if that means i'm an old fart now said:
You are. Pull up a rocker, welcome to the club!

It's pretty amusing to watch this...I've never seen this much dislike of the SN197s on the vintage Mustang sites. I never realized that the Fox guys (and I guess SN95 as well) didn't like the new body style.

While I'm not real pumped about the rear end of the 2010, I really like the new ones. My son's got an 06 V6, and it's a blast to drive. It's also ripe for modding, and I don't think it feels much bigger than my 95 (most of the difference to me feels like the fact that his has a top, and mine doesn't).

Someone ranted earlier that the EcoBoost was going to kill the V8. I'd bet large amounts of cash that that isn't going to happen in the foreseeable future. But having a V6 that can turn out 300hp is a nice addition!

I've actually been seriously considering a V6 for my next project. With the right FI, tuning, suspension, and handling mods, I can see it being a real surprise to the GT owners (and all the mulletheads in their camaros)!
Click to expand...
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 9, 2009
#27
  • Dec 9, 2009
  • #27
Gearbanger 101 said:
.....and yes, bigger was a necessity. At 6’3”, I don’t comfortably fit in either a Fox body, or an SN95. Sure I could tilt the seat back and get away with it like I did in my last Fox for 6-years, but I was always either look out the top of the windshield, banging my knees off the dash/consol, or elbows against the door panels and quite frankly felt claustrophobic in the car 90% of the time. And that was after altering the shift handle and modifying the seat tracks to lengthen their travel. Truth be told.....anyone over about 5’10” needs to make serious compromises just to drive the older models.
Click to expand...


I know you were going over the top to prove a point, but im 6'3" and my 95 doesnt make me feel claustrophobic.

Husky44 said:
Someone ranted earlier that the EcoBoost was going to kill the V8. I'd bet large amounts of cash that that isn't going to happen in the foreseeable future. But having a V6 that can turn out 300hp is a nice addition!

I've actually been seriously considering a V6 for my next project. With the right FI, tuning, suspension, and handling mods, I can see it being a real surprise to the GT owners (and all the mulletheads in their camaros)!
Click to expand...

Unfortunately you're not gonna surprice the mulletheads. They are already used to it. Their v6 little brother already cranks out 300.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 9, 2009
#28
  • Dec 9, 2009
  • #28
nmcgrawj said:
I know you were going over the top to prove a point, but im 6'3" and my 95 doesnt make me feel claustrophobic.
Click to expand...

I actually wasn't going over the top with that part of the description. That was bang on how it was. If you don't feel claustrophobic in yours, that's fine....as long as you don't try to convince me that you actually drive with your seat in the full upright position and aren't continuously looking through the tint of the top part of your windshield when you drive.

I hopped into my friends '94 just the other day and that's exactly what it was like. Not to mention the ability to straighten my legs while seated was nonexistent with the power seat. I would imagine a manual seat adjust would offer slightly less height and possibly a little more leg room, but not by a lot.

To be frank, her ’94 felt smaller than my Fox did.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 9, 2009
#29
  • Dec 9, 2009
  • #29
I don't have the desire to sit perfectly straight up in any car....and that includes my Durango. It's just not comfortable for my back.

Isn't the average height like 5'11"? Being on the taller side of that, I don't expect headroom to be at a premium at a 90* angle.


I hate foxes. Inside and out. (I appreciate the nice ones...but nothing about them makes me say "wow".
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Dec 17, 2009
#30
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #30
stock for stock s197 wins
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 17, 2009
#31
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #31
NotQuik said:
stock for stock s197 wins
Click to expand...


I sure hope it would LOL
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Dec 17, 2009
#32
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #32
Husky44 said:
Now, if you meant to post this apology in the thread about the Viper engine in the SN95, then you should apologize.
Click to expand...

Best thing I have read on here in a long time.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 17, 2009
#33
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #33
Husky44 said:
Now, if you meant to post this apology in the thread about the Viper engine in the SN95, then you should apologize.
Click to expand...
Black Stampede said:
Best thing I have read on here in a long time.
Click to expand...

Boys, boys, boys.....I would first have to be wrong (or at the very least proven wrong) about anything I said in that thread, would I not?
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 18, 2009
#34
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #34
Gearbanger 101 said:
Boys, boys, boys.....I would first have to be wrong (or at the very least proven wrong) about anything I said in that thread, would I not?
Click to expand...


Yea cause in the end, the viper swap produced an overweight stang that was nose heavy....







 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 18, 2009
#35
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #35
nmcgrawj said:
Yea cause in the end, the viper swap produced an overweight stang that was nose heavy....
Click to expand...

In comparison to what could have been with a Ford powerplant under the hood....absolutely.
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Dec 18, 2009
#36
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #36
revhead347 said:
Oh, I would also like to say that the gauges in the SN are also much better. Interior looks better too. But whatever, I'm not going to change your mind, so what's the point. I'm 5' 7", practically a midget, but I have had plenty of friends who were 6' plus and never complained about the head room in their Mustang. The S197 is a big ugly car, and it could wipe my ass for me, I don't care. I don't buy muscle cars to be more complicated.

Kurt
Click to expand...


wow. everyone is entitled to their own opinion but yours differs from mine a whole lot. 05 up cars are awesome, even if you dont care for the styling. these cars are quite superior to the earlier years. i love all mustangs but after driving a 197 car, i have even more respect for them. stops better, accelerates better, rides smoother, clutch engagement & shifting is like butter.

have you driven one?
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 18, 2009
#37
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #37
Gearbanger 101 said:
In comparison to what could have been with a Ford powerplant under the hood....absolutely.
Click to expand...


Huh? Isnt the definition of nose heavy.... something like...i dunno....where there is a lot more weight towards the front of the car?


Find 1 car in this section that makes it look overweight, but puts up HALF the power, and has a better ratio front to back of weight. I'll even extend the search to the corral's 94-95 section.


In all seriousness, you're gonna need a fox to make that sn95 look OVERweight.



You're a smart guy man, dont let your hatred for foreign engine swaps take that away LOL


:grouphug:
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 18, 2009
#38
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #38
Oh yea, in case u guys havent read it yet.

The 2011 GT is confirmed at being a 412hp 5.0L monster. Only picking up like 20lbs of UNsprung weight to boot!

http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/17/2011-ford-mustang-gt-to-offer-412-horsepower-5-0l-v8/
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Dec 18, 2009
#39
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #39
Gearbanger 101 said:
In comparison to what could have been with a Ford powerplant under the hood....absolutely.
Click to expand...

Dear God,
Please keep this debate going for if nothing else my own personal entertainment.

Amen.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 18, 2009
#40
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #40
nmcgrawj said:
Huh? Isnt the definition of nose heavy.... something like...i dunno....where there is a lot more weight towards the front of the car?


Find 1 car in this section that makes it look overweight, but puts up HALF the power, and has a better ratio front to back of weight. I'll even extend the search to the corral's 94-95 section.


In all seriousness, you're gonna need a fox to make that sn95 look OVERweight.



You're a smart guy man, dont let your hatred for foreign engine swaps take that away LOL


:grouphug:
Click to expand...

So you still choose to ignore the weight differences provided between the two engines? The near 200lb difference in mass I had proven between a Viper engine and a stroked aluminum block/aluminum headed 351W are quite significant....argue preferences all you'd like, but the facts are indisputable.

I at no point ignored the fact that the owner of the vehicle did well with reducing the overall weight of the vehicle and maintaining a workable balance of its distribution between the front and rear....but the very fact that the example of the stroked 351W stated above makes as much power and knocks nearly 200lbs more weight off of the front of the nose of the car, thus improving power/ratio and balance considerably more still, proves that it would have been the better option from a performance standpoint right from the get go.

...but then he as much as stated he was building the car to be different, not for best performance now didn't he? And I stated many times throughout the course of the thread that I wasn't knocking the idea of the builder wanting something different and unique (although yourself a a couple of others seem to continually ignore that point), but I don't know how many times I have to prove that its far from being the "better" alternative?

...and my dislike for cross breeding Mustangs with LSX/Mopar, etc powertrains has zero to do with my level of intelligence. Just like I like pepperoni and mushrooms on my pizza, I just personally prefer to see a Ford engine in a Ford vehicle.

If it makes you feel better to spin the truth and twist my words around in attempts to downplay and ignore facts provided, in order to satisfy your personal desire to win an argument, have at it. Just remember, I've provided solid backing for my points....it is you who would rather play ring around the rosy with the same irrelevant points that were never brought into question by me in the first place.

In the end...opinions are subject to scrutiny, but the facts are simply the facts!
Black Stampede said:
Dear God,
Please keep this debate going for if nothing else my own personal entertainment.

Amen.
Click to expand...

Anything to keep going the "hit and run" comments from the peanut gallery I suppose.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
469
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
N
For Sale 1984 Mustang gt
  • NJgeorge
  • Nov 29, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
3
Views
823
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Nov 29, 2024
NJgeorge
N
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
635
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
help me understand calibrated maf sensors and injectors
  • stackz
  • Sep 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?