• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

new personal best last night

  • Thread starter Thread starter rustang04
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

rustang04

Banned
May 4, 2004
239
0
0
Oct 9, 2004
#1
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #1
i went to the track last night and here is hoe it went.

R/T .812
60' 1.703
330 4.906
1/8 7.608
MPH 91.52
1000 9.910
1/4 11.863
MPH 115.27
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Oct 9, 2004
#2
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #2
rustang04 said:
i went to the track last night and here is hoe it went.

R/T .812
60' 1.703
330 4.906
1/8 7.608
MPH 91.52
1000 9.910
1/4 11.863
MPH 115.27
Click to expand...



how did you hit a 1.70 60'?? slicks? DRs? thats absolutly sick!!
 

rustang04

Banned
May 4, 2004
239
0
0
Oct 9, 2004
#3
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #3
m/t e.t. streets
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Oct 9, 2004
#4
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #4
60' is pretty weak, work on that and knock another .2 off of your et
 

GreekStang85

Member
Jun 11, 2003
485
0
16
Oct 9, 2004
#5
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #5
nice times man, how do you like that procharger?
 

BigHairyMonkey

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2003
411
1
16
Houston (Bellaire) TX
Oct 9, 2004
#6
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #6
jesus, post some pics of your car
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Oct 9, 2004
#7
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #7
great times for the numbers you got. Congrats
 

rustang04

Banned
May 4, 2004
239
0
0
Oct 10, 2004
#8
  • Oct 10, 2004
  • #8
i don't believe the 60' is week jackie chan. especially since the car is stock weight with only springs in it. what are your 60' times?
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Oct 10, 2004
#9
  • Oct 10, 2004
  • #9
rustang04 said:
i don't believe the 60' is week jackie chan. especially since the car is stock weight with only springs in it. what are your 60' times?
Click to expand...
don't take it the wrong way, but i am pulling the same 60's on motor in a vert on a bone stock suspension. you should get into the 1.6's no problem on a decent track
 

BanginStang97GT

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2001
1,025
0
0
Jersey
Oct 10, 2004
#10
  • Oct 10, 2004
  • #10
Try launching a blower car its a lot different than launching an all motor car. I have a v2 w/12psi during racing. I have upper and lowers and mt e.t streets and it's still a PITA to launch. 1.7's are good, we aren't pro's here. Well I'm not atleast.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Oct 11, 2004
#11
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #11
BanginStang97GT said:
Try launching a blower car its a lot different than launching an all motor car. I have a v2 w/12psi during racing. I have upper and lowers and mt e.t streets and it's still a PITA to launch. 1.7's are good, we aren't pro's here. Well I'm not atleast.
Click to expand...
if i had a blower on my car i would be in the 1.6s guaranteed, hell if i had some softer springs, airbag and skinnies i would hit 1.69s im sure of it @ 3600lbs NA. im no pro either, i just stated the 60's were weak, which they are. minor tweaks and practice will pick up some good et in the car
 

stang976

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
853
0
0
Westchester, NY
Oct 11, 2004
#12
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #12
11.86
 

rustang04

Banned
May 4, 2004
239
0
0
Oct 11, 2004
#13
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #13
you also have 4.10 gears, i have only 3.73 gears but i don't take it the wrong way i just disagree that there weak times. my best 60' is a 1.697. i am only launching the car at 4k and slipping the clutch. i don't want to break the stock axles, rear end, or fold control arms.
 
9

94VIRGINIASTANG

Founding Member
Feb 2, 2001
75
0
0
Nov 19, 2004
#14
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #14
I have the exact same setup.Im getting ready to get it tuned.How many pounds of boost are you running?
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 19, 2004
#15
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #15
Congrats on your new time I must say impressive times and
your 60ft wasn't bad at all good job! Practice makes perfect.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Nov 19, 2004
#16
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #16
nevermind i pulled a 1.68 on a bone stock suspension so still i say there is more in the 60', just need to let it rip
 

reeber

10 Year Member
Mar 10, 2004
574
26
38
Berlin, NJ
Nov 19, 2004
#17
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #17
I happen to think that your 60' is great! I am still learning how to launch my car with the blower. It really is a whole new world. I have LCAs and springs, but still have a 1.922 best 60'.. I know I have .1 or .2 to go, but that will come with A LOT of practice... Great job!!
 

BanginStang97GT

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2001
1,025
0
0
Jersey
Nov 19, 2004
#18
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #18
What did you run reeber?
 

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Nov 19, 2004
#19
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #19
Hey I know the R/T is not relative to the total time or any other of the times but a .812 pretty much sucks other than that damn thats fast
 
E

el_kid_1

New Member
Oct 30, 2003
738
0
0
Puerto Rico
Nov 19, 2004
#20
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #20
Those are great ET times for the power numbers you have. ET Streets makes a lot of difference. My last time to the track I pull 1.77 on the 60' with BFG Drag Radials (295/35/18). Now I have a set of superior axles, eatoin differential, ProStar wheels and MT ET Drags sitting on my garage wating to be installed. I hope that with that combo I could run in the mid to high 11s.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine Ron Francis aka The Detail Zone and their Ford harnesses are beyond poor quality.Here's why.
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Oct 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 13, 2022
CAMTWO1070
C
New turbo slower times
  • Clarence Saxon
  • Jul 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2019
General karthief
Fox New PB, finally got into the 10's!
  • RangerJoe
  • Jun 1, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2019
Rideordie1720
R
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?