• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

new personal best last night

  • Thread starter Thread starter rustang04
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Nov 20, 2004
#21
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #21
Great time!

Congrats.
 
S

showstopper2

Founding Member
Apr 16, 2001
425
0
0
New Bedford, Ma.
Nov 20, 2004
#22
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #22
nice times Rustang....hopefully when I get some ET Streets under my car I can blast in the 11's solidly. I'm more worried about the tranny letting go behind my motor. can't wait to get to the track next year.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
Nov 20, 2004
#23
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #23
Jackie Chan said:
60' is pretty weak, work on that and knock another .2 off of your et
Click to expand...
Still, not bad for a street driven Stang............
 
D

damien2003gt

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
181
0
0
Nov 20, 2004
#24
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #24
Jackie Chan said:
60' is pretty weak, work on that and knock another .2 off of your et
Click to expand...

Are you for real? get bent whackie man!
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Nov 20, 2004
#25
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #25
damien2003gt said:
Are you for real? get bent whackie man!
Click to expand...
yeah you know what im sorry. i pull those 60's and better(best of 1.68) in a heavier car with a lot less power and everyone i know with bolt on stangs and stock suspensions can pull off the same, hell i even know a couple of guys with bolt on 2vs that have pulled within half a tenth on 17" drag radials. then the blower cars my friends have are deep in the 1.6's and into the 1.5s. but whatever, the 60' is kinda weak like i said, he said he didnt launch it hard in a previous post, then i said to launch it hard. so read everything, comprehend or stfu
 

Steeda Q

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
870
0
0
Kitchener, Ontario
Nov 20, 2004
#26
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #26
not bad...but u should be in 1.6's

i hit 1.49 wit my suspension and it is really a budget setup..
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine Ron Francis aka The Detail Zone and their Ford harnesses are beyond poor quality.Here's why.
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Oct 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 13, 2022
CAMTWO1070
C
New turbo slower times
  • Clarence Saxon
  • Jul 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2019
General karthief
Fox New PB, finally got into the 10's!
  • RangerJoe
  • Jun 1, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2019
Rideordie1720
R
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?