• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Stinger Performance Project "Car"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stinger
  • Start date Start date Jul 28, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 28, 2006
#1
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #1
As some of you already know, I bought a dragster yesterday. Hopefully I can answer most of the questions here. First some pics:
View attachment 452477
View attachment 452479
View attachment 452482
View attachment 452483

Specs:
167" wheelbase
Built by a professional race shop
Chrome Moly tubing chassis
Raced in several different ET classes in North
Race weight is ~1000lbs
Engine is a 2.0L turbo running 22psi.
Transmission: Doug Nash 5 speed, air shifted
Rear End: Shortened Ford 9"
Engine specs:
10.5:1 compression
Aluminum Rods
Draw-thru carb
Runs on race gas (130 octane), not alky.
Professionally Ported Head/Oversize SS valves/Comp Cam...supposedly the exact same head porting, cam, etc. as Buddy Engersol ran in his 2.0 turbo motors...this guy acted like he knew Buddy pretty well.

His spare engine and all spare parts are included with the car.

The dragster ran the 1/4 mile in the high 9 second range at 140+mph. It has not been raced for 4 years.

Using the horsepower calculators, it seems it only takes about 200hp to go high 9's at 1000lbs. That means it either weighs more than a grand, they ran it real easy, or the engines don't run as they should.

I plan to pull the carbed 2.0 out and replace it with a 2.3 EFI turbo motor for various reasons. Mainly because I'm familiar with them, I have tons of parts for them, they are dirt cheap to replace, run on pump gas, and I know much more about EFI than carbs. The other bonus is at the power levels required to haul ass in this thing, the EFI motors are dead reliable.

I plan to intercool it once the 2.3 goes in, otherwise it will be a simple bolt-on 2.3 engine for now. Ported head, big cam, etc. will follow depending on performance of the bolt-on engine.

The first things I'll need to do once I get it home is to buy new safety equipement (belts, etc.) and then see what it takes to get it re-certified. Once the car is certified, I'll have to take a physical and then make some shakedown runs before I can get licensed to drive it. I also plan to weigh it as soon as I can so I can figure out how much power I actually need to make to run the speeds I'd like to run.

I won't be able to pick it up until I return from my West Coast vacation on August 7th. Then there will be some updates...
 

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Jul 28, 2006
#2
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #2
Looks bad ass Stinger Man if you put a 2.3T in there that thing will be a rocket with wheels.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jul 28, 2006
#3
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #3
hmmmm looks like a awesome new project.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 28, 2006
#4
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #4
WORLD'S FASTEST JUNKYARD ENGINE!!!!

You need to be looking for a driver for that thing.....somebody stupid enough to not let go of the throttle....

We could do it like "Cool Runnings" where we both ride.
"Feel the rythme"
"Feel the ryhme"
"Get on up, Its rail car time!!!!"
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Jul 28, 2006
#5
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #5
351wcoupe said:
We could do it like "Cool Runnings" where we both ride.
"Feel the rythme"
"Feel the ryhme"
"Get on up, Its rail car time!!!!"
Click to expand...

Sweet deal Stinger. And forgive me, but what does "air shifted" mean???
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 29, 2006
#6
  • Jul 29, 2006
  • #6
It means you don't have to clutch it to shift...just either push a button or just slam the lever to go to the next gear...
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 30, 2006
#7
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #7
Stinger Transmission: Doug Nash 5 speed said:
Dooooood! I'd like some pictures of that shifter on the trans!

Jeez, 22psi getting squeezed by 10.5:1 and no I/C? On methanol I could understand, but gasoline? I think you'll be more than 9 second capable with just a stout EFI 2.3.
Click to expand...
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jul 30, 2006
#8
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #8
The shifter doesn't make it able to be air shifted...it's not a T5 trans or anything, it's a full on race trans...the shifter is nothing more than a standard looking lever.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 30, 2006
#9
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #9
Right, I just haven't seen a detail shot of one. Is it a vertical pattern?
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jul 30, 2006
#10
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #10
It uses an inline gate shift pattern instead of the H pattern we see.
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Aug 12, 2006
#11
  • Aug 12, 2006
  • #11
sooooo.....whats the progress of this project, im getting kinda antsy, any thing done to it yet? engine stripped or anything of that sort?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Aug 14, 2006
#12
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #12
I just went and picked it up...got home last night. I was on vacation last week, hence the delay.

Updates to come...
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Aug 16, 2006
#13
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #13
instead of updates to come
I'd say timeslips to come.
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Aug 16, 2006
#14
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #14
agree'd. hurry up and get it done >< lol
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Aug 17, 2006
#15
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #15
I am seriously jealous!

I want one!

If you don't mind, do you have a regular racing plan in mind? Local bracket series, or index classes?

These look like once you get one, they are less costly and easier to keep up than a door car.

Keep us posted.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 17, 2006
#16
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #16
I just noticed something.......is the turbine housing a .63, .82, or a tangential T4? It looks awful big for a 2.0. I dunno, my only .60/.63 T3 in under the intercooler on my SVO(hard to see).
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Aug 17, 2006
#17
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #17
Turbine housing as a full T4 style .96 a/r housing. It's not just any ol' 2.0 though...it's fully ported, huge cam, 10.5:1 compression, and spins 13,500 rpm

Here are about 45 pics of it now that I've got it home: http://s114.photobucket.com/albums/n266/yellow_stinger/Dragster/
 
S

Shinlee

New Member
Feb 10, 2006
146
0
0
Aug 17, 2006
#18
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #18
ty for update, now make it go vroom
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 18, 2006
#19
  • Aug 18, 2006
  • #19
Stinger said:
Turbine housing as a full T4 style .96 a/r housing. It's not just any ol' 2.0 though...it's fully ported, huge cam, 10.5:1 compression, and spins 13,500 rpm
Click to expand...

'Splains that then. I would have expected lower than 9s for that much boost on that much engine. Then again, no I/C on 22psi can't be doing much for the charge density.

13,500? For real?
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Aug 25, 2006
#20
  • Aug 25, 2006
  • #20
Somebody look in jegs and check out how hard it is to find a tach that goes up that far.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
694
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?