• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

New times after putting car on a diet

  • Thread starter Thread starter kooldawg6
  • Start date Start date Sep 24, 2007

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 24, 2007
#1
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #1
Well after removing 195 lbs from when I ran it in the spring and absolutely no new performance mods, I got what i was hoping for...13.1s! My previous thread had it at 183 lbs, but I removed the heavy duty rubber floor mats I have(all except the driver mat)and that was another 12 lbs!!!!! Had this been 1/8th mile racing, I would've been big time upset as the stock tires were near useless for the first few hundred feet. There was 1 run where I revved up to about 1500 RPM and I literaly smoked the tires all the way through 3rd gear until I let off the gas completely so they could hook So most of my runs were off idle or just above. My overall gains were -.236 E.T. and 1.9 MPH Not bad for totaly free mods. Here are a few of my slips and a chart from the spring runs and yesterdays.




Here is the tire frying run


 

Attachments

  • Run4.webp
    11.3 KB · Views: 159
  • Run5.webp
    14.3 KB · Views: 163
  • Run3.webp
    11.1 KB · Views: 166
  • MyMustangTimes.webp
    57.3 KB · Views: 158

onebad95

Sherriff of Bling King County
Jul 22, 2002
1,237
0
37
At the end of the track waiting for you !!
Sep 24, 2007
#2
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #2
congrats. that 106 is a real good mph.
 
B

boss 245

New Member
Aug 29, 2007
20
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#3
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #3
Very nice, that's haul'n!
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 24, 2007
#4
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #4
With 4.10's you definitely need some sticky tires. Even some 555's or KDW2's would make a huge difference. You'd be in 12's for sure even with those type of tires. Good runs, though.
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Sep 24, 2007
#5
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #5
Definitely a 12.90 car if you get some sticky tires on it so you can launch harder. Good runs, Kookdawg6! Good to see another S197 GT automatic charging hard at the track.
 

Power4

Member
May 10, 2004
200
0
16
Rochester, NY
Sep 24, 2007
#6
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #6
What did you remove to get rid of 195 lbs?
 

gashog

Member
Dec 26, 2006
139
0
16
Fresno, CA
Sep 24, 2007
#7
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #7
Power4 said:
What did you remove to get rid of 195 lbs?
Click to expand...

+1

Congrats on the times dawg, 12s are just around the corner. Put some stickies on the back and you've got it.
 

seal614

Member
Jul 4, 2007
0
0
6
Philadelphia
Sep 24, 2007
#8
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #8
I'm gonna assume from your extra efforts on weight-removal that you were running with less than a 1/4 tank of gas?

/easiest way to shed weight
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 24, 2007
#9
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #9
seal614 said:
I'm gonna assume from your extra efforts on weight-removal that you were running with less than a 1/4 tank of gas?

/easiest way to shed weight
Click to expand...

Believe it or not I was trying to do that, BUT I misjudged on mileage and got there almost right at half tank Friday and Saturday, I was only putting in 5 or 6 gallons at a time and driving back and forth and all over MD. Perhaps the long cruise to the track yesterday morning plus the dropped weight gave me better MPG . I know my dash gauge showed 20.3 MPG after my 11 runs and several long burnouts. Here is a pic of my tire destruction

 

Attachments

  • DSC03924.webp
    113.2 KB · Views: 125

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 24, 2007
#10
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #10
Power4 said:
What did you remove to get rid of 195 lbs?
Click to expand...

This http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=720784 PLUS removing 3 of my heavy duty rubber floor mats which weighed in at a whopping 12 LBS!
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Sep 24, 2007
#11
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #11
Power4 said:
What did you remove to get rid of 195 lbs?
Click to expand...

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=720784

nice times kooldawg!

EDIT: lol at the timestamps on our replies.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 24, 2007
#12
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #12
Five Oh Brian said:
Definitely a 12.90 car if you get some sticky tires on it so you can launch harder. Good runs, Kookdawg6! Good to see another S197 GT automatic charging hard at the track.
Click to expand...

Next year I will have dedicated track tires/wheels for the rear! Speaking of hard charging autos, I met spyder7724 there. That car is rocking! He got a best of 12.09, but I personally saw him run a 12.19@114+! He does have a ton of bolt ons and various weight saving things done as well as many other little things here and there to make tiny improvements. He said his car dynoed at 296 RWHP(100% stock longblock)so he is making the best of getting it to the track The times and speeds he was posting were more than a few of the S/C S197s there(even some with DRs)
 

BREDn07

New Member
Mar 30, 2007
54
0
0
Fresno, Ca
Sep 24, 2007
#13
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #13
good job dawg...i tip my hat to you! good times...keep it up
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 25, 2007
#14
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #14
Thanks BRED It's a blast to drive a car that is that capable with doing very little to it. My goal is to have a DD(right now that is 28K miles/year) N/A mid 12 sec car that if I choose, I can take on a several hundred mile trip without scarificing my sanity or comfort
 
S

superman112

New Member
Nov 7, 2004
14
0
0
Sep 25, 2007
#15
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #15
was it hard to remove the shaker 1000?? I am planing on removing that and the rear seats over the winter.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 25, 2007
#16
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #16
superman112 said:
was it hard to remove the shaker 1000?? I am planing on removing that and the rear seats over the winter.
Click to expand...

Not at all.
Holding the box are 3 bolts and 1 nut. 2 wire connectors between the box and tail light. The amp rack is held by 3 bolts and 1 nut as well. There is 1 wire connector for that located just under the 2 for the sub box.
View attachment 360759

The seat backs are only held on by the latch at the top, 1 bolt at the outside bottom corner(pull the back corner of the bottom seat up and you will see the bolt). Then there is a bracket mounted at the lower center of the back seats. Unbolt it(I used an open end wrench).The seat back just slides towards the outside of the car off the bracket(repeat for the other side). The seat bottom is only held in by 2 plastic clips(1 on each side). They are about where the plastic trim piece ends under the front of the seat. Just push those in and out she comes. Getting the seats back in took some time. The lower part just snaps back in within seconds. Getting the seat backs to stay on the bracket while you manuver it to get the bolt back in is a slight PITA. Once you have that bolt started with the 2 seats on the bracket you have it made. Just line up the brackets on the outside corner of the seat and install the bolt. I think it took me about 30 minutes to put the back seat back in...I don't know if there is enough room to slip the seat backs off the center bracket without removing the bracket? Also, I wonder if the seat bottom can be removed first making it easier to acces the seat back bolts or if the backs do have to be removed first. One thing for sure, if I didn't drive this as much with my 5 year old son, the backs seat would be gone permanantly!

Center bracket holding seat backs(looking straight down while seats are folded down)


Bolt holding outside of seat backs


Plastic clip holding seat bottom(passenger side)
 

Attachments

  • DSC03929.webp
    159.2 KB · Views: 128
  • DSC03928.webp
    70.3 KB · Views: 122
  • DSC03927.webp
    94.3 KB · Views: 121
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New misfire after replacing valve seals/springs.
  • SpeedofDarkness
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
206
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2025
SpeedofDarkness
S
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
802
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
W
Resolved Loss of Horsepower After Base Idle Reset??
  • WTW
  • Aug 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 13, 2023
WTW
W
C
Anybody recognize this car?
  • ctandc
  • Jun 14, 2023
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
10
Views
3K
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?