• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

New to the Game

  • Thread starter Thread starter Y2K4 STANG
  • Start date Start date Jul 3, 2006
Y

Y2K4 STANG

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
36
0
0
NEWPORT NEWS VA
Jul 3, 2006
#1
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #1
I just picked up a 67 coupe with a 289 4v. Mostly stock but it does have sub frame conectors and was thinking of dropping a 347 but Im a little worried that will be to much power. Should I just hop up the 289 or go with a new engine? The car is not orignal. Picks will be next.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jul 3, 2006
#2
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #2
Never too much engine......but you need to ask yourself how much power do I need and secondly and most important, how much coin can I afford to spend.

With the 68 your choices are greatly enhanced due to having more engine compartment to work with. I have a 347 and am very pleased with it, the only thing that I am going to change is the block due to the fact that the factory 5.0 block tends to split apart beyond the 500HP threshold and I want to either spray mine are force some air into it via supercharger in the future. A Dart block is in my future.

If I were in your shoes I would stroke a 351W to somewhere over 400ci. Ther are folks on here that can tell you what is the stoutest factory block to start with would be or dig deep and buy a dart based block or some sort of either Ford Racing or aftermarket block to start your build.

In any case lots of smart guys on here to help so welcome to the club....
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Jul 3, 2006
#3
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #3
The problem with "hopping up" an older engine is that when you add good heads, it puts excess strain on the old bottom end and you ruin the engine. If the engine is fresh, it is an option but I would go with a stroker.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Jul 3, 2006
#4
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #4
Even a 351W not stroked would be a good candidate. You'd have more torque and could build it later on if it's not enough. It would be an easy swap.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 3, 2006
#5
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #5
Yeah, the 351W is nearly a drop-in for replacement for the 289, but the 289 can also be taken out to that 347 inches you mentioned. I personally would do a 331 as a compromise between power and longetivity. Actually, I would keep the 289 and make it a high revver, but that's just me.

I have a 351W waiting for a rebuild anyway. We'll see where that goes.
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Jul 3, 2006
#6
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #6
Y2K4 STANG said:
I just picked up a 67 coupe with a 289 4v. Mostly stock but it does have sub frame conectors and was thinking of dropping a 347 but Im a little worried that will be to much power. Should I just hop up the 289 or go with a new engine? The car is not orignal. Picks will be next.
Click to expand...

Congrats! Now the fun begins.

Looking forward to the pics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
New here from Maine
  • lobster
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
536
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
lobster
L
C
New mustang owner
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
121
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
9
New from northern MN
  • 91firecracker
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
123
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2026
Noobz347
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
199
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
704
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?