Newer 302 Boss?
- Thread starter Jared Hammel
- Start date
@Jared Hammel
Well, I'm not too well-informed on late-model, like OHC V-8s, but can tell you I saw with my own eyes once, long ago, a 1969 Mustang with a SOHC 427 "Cammer" in it, in Cicero, Illinois. Worst part was, it was for sale! I don't believe hardly any of today's OHCs, like 4.6, 5.4, etc., are wider than a Cammer. Width is the difficult factor in Mustang conversions, due to the spring towers. Ford originally stuck regular 427s in Fairlanes ~ 1963 or '4. They cut the tower faces away clear to the spring, maybe even used smaller OD springs, then welded flat plate in place vertically and horizontally, to return adequate strength to the towers, which basically support the weight of the front of the car.
Crazy things CAN be done, as you mention, least amount of modification is often a moot point. Below, my 1963 Falcon, ca. about 1970, with a big, 430 Lincoln tucked away under stock hood.
You can see the flat, 1/4" plates I welded on the spring towers, and the huge iron exhaust manifolds, this was a WIDE engine for it's time! Sorry, no digital cameras then. imp
Well, I'm not too well-informed on late-model, like OHC V-8s, but can tell you I saw with my own eyes once, long ago, a 1969 Mustang with a SOHC 427 "Cammer" in it, in Cicero, Illinois. Worst part was, it was for sale! I don't believe hardly any of today's OHCs, like 4.6, 5.4, etc., are wider than a Cammer. Width is the difficult factor in Mustang conversions, due to the spring towers. Ford originally stuck regular 427s in Fairlanes ~ 1963 or '4. They cut the tower faces away clear to the spring, maybe even used smaller OD springs, then welded flat plate in place vertically and horizontally, to return adequate strength to the towers, which basically support the weight of the front of the car.
Crazy things CAN be done, as you mention, least amount of modification is often a moot point. Below, my 1963 Falcon, ca. about 1970, with a big, 430 Lincoln tucked away under stock hood.
You can see the flat, 1/4" plates I welded on the spring towers, and the huge iron exhaust manifolds, this was a WIDE engine for it's time! Sorry, no digital cameras then. imp
@Jared Hammel
Yes I have an idea. Nothing will "bolt up". That is an OHC engine, very wide, and you would need to know it's overall dimensions, and measure the engine room in your '69 to even consider the possibilities. It can be done, don't know the vehicle, or if those spring towers were modified, but here's how it would look:
@Jared Hammel
The easiest bolt in if you're looking for "big iron", would be a Ford FE Series engine of any size of your choosing. 390, 427, 428, for example. 69s were available with the FE from the factory, so ripping up of the engine compartment would not be needed.
On the 6-speed auto, sorry, I can't help you. imp
One of the biggest obstacles in the early Mustangs is space! You can do a "FE" big block engine swap, and that would be cool. I can tell you from experience that those engines are a tight fit. I would recommend building a 347 stroker motor out of your existing 302. A well built 347 can be a handful in a chassis as light as these cars are. if that's not enough build a stroked 351 Windsor. A Windsor will easily fit and can be taken up to 427 cubic inches in a factory block. A stroked Windsor will do everything a big block FE will do in a smaller lighter package, and parts are easier to find. On the transmission, do you just want 6 speeds? A great upgrade would be a Ford AOD transmission. The AOD is a 4 speed automatic, the 4th gear is an overdrive so its great for highway driving and they easily fit in early Mustangs. If you just want 6 speeds in an automatic you can put a Gear Vendors gear splitter behind a C4 and you would, essentially, have a 6 speed automatic. Gear Vendors is a pricey upgrade. Personally, a 347 engine/AOD transmission would be a great combination. All of the parts are readily available and affordable. You are only limited by your budget and imagination. What ever you do, have fun with it!
@mustangbrad
Great words of wisdom! I've always been a fan if the FEs because I "grew up" with them, put a 352 in one of my first cars, a '55 Merc. I particularly liked them because of the staunch "Y-Block" design, with the crankcase cast down below the crank centerline, very strong, flat oil pan gasket surface, and possibility to cross-bolt the main bearing caps from outside the crankcase. 427 did that, 428 did not. I heard of very few 427s blowing up. They were heavy. Later called boat anchors. But pretty indestructible. imp
Most 347 stroker kits use use .03" over pistons. So you should be good there, assuming the block is good and the bore is fresh. Unless you are absolutely sure about what you have, as far as the block is concerned, take it to a machine shop and have it checked out! You don't want to start an engine build on a bad block.
Similar threads
