• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Nitrous oxide questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barrier
  • Start date Start date Jan 28, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Barrier

New Member
May 11, 2005
155
0
0
Jan 30, 2007
#21
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #21
Haha, this is why Kev = the MAN!

Hey Kev, I'm thinking about doing the wiring in this way, tell me what you think.



EDIT: I would of course be putting in the necessary fuses and hook the arm switch and button in to a power source the way the kit tells me to do it, this is more along the lines of seeing if my diagram from the arm switch to the solenoids will work.
 

Attachments

  • n2odu1.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 153

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 30, 2007
#22
  • Jan 30, 2007
  • #22
The only thing I don't see on that wiring diagram is a relay. Make sure you use a relay between the arming switch and solenoids and make sure the relay is grounded very well.

Normally whatever kit you buy will include instructions and wiring diagrams. NX has a pretty decent writeup for the 4.6 on their website.
 
2

2kyellowgt

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
224
0
0
Nanuet, NY
Jan 31, 2007
#23
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #23
I have been running a 150 shot for about 2 years now. On a completey stock motor. I Have all the safety goodies, tune, focus pump and #30 injectors. I make 437 hp and 461 tq on a Mustang Dyno. I was told that is over 450 on a dyno jet.

I use NX wet plate kit. There are no problems with backfires or puddling at all. you just need to know what you are doing.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Jan 31, 2007
#24
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #24
LaserRed01GT said:
Nitrous oxide generates enormous cylinder pressures under load. Far more than boost from a blower. A 300 shot on a 4.6 2V could easily generate over a 500 PSI (BMEP) cylinder pressure. That pressure combined with the heat that would accompany it would make quick work of a stock bottom end. The Hypereutectic pistons would literally be melted. The stock ignition system would also not be able to generate enough spark energy even with a tightly gapped 2 or 3 step colder plug. Nobody has made 600 RWHP on the stock bottom end and had it last for years. That is total bull.

When you say other tuners have got 450-550 RWHP from the stock block, I’m sure you mean shortblock. There is a big difference between a block and shortblock.

This is a block(notice the rotating assembly is not installed):

View attachment 406685

And this is a shortblock(notice the rotating assembly is installed):

View attachment 406687
Click to expand...

Now I understand that nitrous creates too much heat/pressure for the stock shortblock (in massive quantities). Thanks for clearing that up.

I said block, but I meant shortblock, meaning stock pistons/crank/rods etc.

Here is one guy making 530whp http://www.modularfords.com/forums/...stock-short-b-23628.html?highlight=600whp

615WHP:
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/mustang-gt/my-car-just-made-615-rwhp-62106.html

Stock shortblocks my friend
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Jan 31, 2007
#25
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #25
Barrier:

DIY write up: http://www.freewebs.com/dndgarage/nxinstall.htm

Wire diagram: http://forums.************.com/power-adder/31917-faq-nitrous.html
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 31, 2007
#26
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #26
the98stang said:
Now I understand that nitrous creates too much heat/pressure for the stock shortblock (in massive quantities). Thanks for clearing that up.

I said block, but I meant shortblock, meaning stock pistons/crank/rods etc.

Here is one guy making 530whp http://www.modularfords.com/forums/...stock-short-b-23628.html?highlight=600whp

615WHP:
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/mustang-gt/my-car-just-made-615-rwhp-62106.html

Stock shortblocks my friend
Click to expand...

Those motors are are on borrowed time "my friend". It's just a matter of time before they become expensive paperweights.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 31, 2007
#27
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #27
Barrier said:
Haha, this is why Kev = the MAN!

Hey Kev, I'm thinking about doing the wiring in this way, tell me what you think.

EDIT: I would of course be putting in the necessary fuses and hook the arm switch and button in to a power source the way the kit tells me to do it, this is more along the lines of seeing if my diagram from the arm switch to the solenoids will work.
Click to expand...

Wes, here is a simpler diagram that will show you the basics of the noid/relay/toggle switch wiring. The purge solenoid will get it's power the same way the N20/Fuel noids do.

View attachment 406683
 
C

Chris00GT

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
275
0
16
York Springs, PA
Jan 31, 2007
#28
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #28
LaserRed01GT said:
Those motors are are on borrowed time "my friend". It's just a matter of time before they become expensive paperweights.
Click to expand...

Look at the post date for the 530rwhp, it's been almost two years of borrowed time and before that over 2 years at 460rwhp and she's still going. Granted that the guy in the other link did fail late last year. It's all in how you drive and treat the car. Mine was tuned since day one and I don't beat on the car every day. You also have to consider a blower is less stain on a motor than nitrous. Nitrous is instant while the blower builds boost as the RPM's go up.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 31, 2007
#29
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #29
Chris00GT said:
Look at the post date for the 530rwhp, it's been almost two years of borrowed time and before that over 2 years at 460rwhp and she's still going. Granted that the guy in the other link did fail late last year. It's all in how you drive and treat the car. Mine was tuned since day one and I don't beat on the car every day. You also have to consider a blower is less stain on a motor than nitrous. Nitrous is instant while the blower builds boost as the RPM's go up.
Click to expand...

So you have a one in a million factory bottom end and although impressive, the other 99.99% of motors out there making that kind of power would be ticking time bombs. It doesn't take beating on the car everyday, it just takes one time going WOT to break parts.

Although 530 on the stock shortblock is nothing to shake a stick at, this is a nitrous thread, and we were talking about the limitations of nitrous on a stock shortblock, not the limitations of a forced induction car making 530 to the tire on a magical one in a million shortblock.
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
Jan 31, 2007
#30
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #30
the98stang said:
Just curious- why would a 300 direct port not work on a stock 4.6 2v? There was a guy on modularfords pushing 600+ WHP on the stock block FOR 3 YEARS (with boost)! I know, sounds rediculous, but that's what he claims. Others have tuned these motors for 450-550 on the stock block as well. I know a 300 shot on the stocker is a stupid thing to do, but how is it not possible if others have lasted years with more HP, using a blower?
Click to expand...

Theres a big difference between 550whp on boost and the same number on nitrous for the reasons already stated in this thread. I call major BS on anyone spraying anything over 150 on stock internals and it lasting very long if not blowing up the intake right away it wont be long before something lets go inside the shortblock. I know of at least 2 videos on streetfire right now where you can watch it yourself.

My buddy went out and bought a 2001 cobra with the 4v and purchased the basic boltons. He still couldnt keep up with me on spray so promptly went out and bought a NX kit and went straight to a 150 shot. I warned him he was playing with fire and should keep it safer. Two weeks later his bottom end let go. His car is still sitting in the garage while he saves for a built motor.

As for direct port unfortunately its not fullproof either.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=678166

I am a big advocate of spray but it has its limitations. I have run well over 75 bottles on my engine without a hiccup. If someone has proof of a stock internal engine taking anything over 150 shot and lasting I would love to see it. If someone has proof of anything over 225 wet shot lasting w/o popping an intake I would love to see that.
 
C

Chris00GT

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
275
0
16
York Springs, PA
Jan 31, 2007
#31
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #31
I agree two different animals! If I had nitrous on my 00GT I wouldn't go higher than a 150hp shot and more than likely I would use a 100hp shot most of the time. I also like the plate setups more. I have the NOS big shot kit on my 91LX that sits inbetween the upper and lower intake with a 150hp shot. For safety I have a MSD digital window switch and a ZEX WOT switch. Then on my 88LX I have the NX nitrous plate with a 200hp shot, but is controlled by my MSD digital 7.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Jan 31, 2007
#32
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #32
Chris00GT said:
I agree two different animals! If I had nitrous on my 00GT I wouldn't go higher than a 150hp shot and more than likely I would use a 100hp shot most of the time. I also like the plate setups more. I have the NOS big shot kit on my 91LX that sits inbetween the upper and lower intake with a 150hp shot. For safety I have a MSD digital window switch and a ZEX WOT switch. Then on my 88LX I have the NX nitrous plate with a 200hp shot, but is controlled by my MSD digital 7.
Click to expand...

Sounds like fun! I used a 2 stage Wilson plate dry system on my 97 Z28. It was a 410 HP shot through a hybrid/custom Brodix 1801 intake and 4500 dominator 2000 CFM TB. Jeff Prock flowed everything for me and it work really nice. The 1801 looked just like the previous LT4 intake that was on there.

View attachment 406665

The 383 LT4 that's in my 97 T/A had a direct port setup, but it's now getting a blown BBC and is all gutted to get the cage in. I am looking for another notch as we speak, know any good rollers? And my family and friends wonder why I am not married yet!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 31, 2007
#33
  • Jan 31, 2007
  • #33
For the blower cars guys, ITS ALL IN THE TUNE!
Same with N20 ofcourse...but like said cylinder pressure just becomes too much after a while.

I think Chriss00GTs car is staying togethor due to the tune. There are plenty of 05+ stangs pushing WELL over 500RWHP and those clowns are spinning them to 6800RPMs. From what I have seen thus far, their bottom end is the same as ours...besides the pistons, which are actually weaker.

No pre ignition or detonation (detonation being much more common IMO) and the stock motor is good for a while....thats the key.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Feb 1, 2007
#34
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #34
LaserRed01GT said:
Those motors are are on borrowed time "my friend". It's just a matter of time before they become expensive paperweights.
Click to expand...

Oh, but what happened to "Nobody has made 600 RWHP on the stock bottom end and had it last for years. That is total bull."

I never said they weren't on borrowed time. Plus "borrowed time" is a broad statement. I guess you think "borrowed time" means 2-3 years?

I don't care if only a few blocks are capable/have handled that kind of power. The fact is, IT'S POSSIBLE.
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Feb 1, 2007
#35
  • Feb 1, 2007
  • #35
the98stang said:
Oh, but what happened to "Nobody has made 600 RWHP on the stock bottom end and had it last for years. That is total bull."

I never said they weren't on borrowed time. Plus "borrowed time" is a broad statement. I guess you think "borrowed time" means 2-3 years?

I don't care if only a few blocks are capable/have handled that kind of power. The fact is, IT'S POSSIBLE.
Click to expand...

You do not take one VERY unique instance of somebody defying all the odds and try to tell everybody that if one motor out of a million can do it, well then so can everybody else. It doesn’t work that way unfortunately. We all tip our hat to Chris for pulling this off, but it in no way shows that this is, nor should be common practice. Like I said, 99.99% of the stock bottom end 4.6 2 valves are on borrowed time over 450 RWHP. It’s just the nature of the beast.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
601
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
A
Fuel Capable fuel system for +600hp
  • Avia.tuned
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
85
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
C
Wiring harness needed
  • CoyoteSwappedS197
  • Feb 12, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
84
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 12, 2026
CoyoteSwappedS197
C
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
351
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
S
ECU help!
  • starkiller1134
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
starkiller1134
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?