• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

No more speed density!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnnyGMachine
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
Apr 28, 2009
#1
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #1
Well, this weekend my buddy John and I completed the mass air conversion on my 88 GT. I know the 88 isn't a 4-eye but the conversion was thoroughly documented with many photos and written documentation for those wanting to do the conversion. This is the same car I bought almost 100% stock that I promised my wife I wouldn't modify and just drive as my daily driver. Oh well.
The throttle body was wore out, the vacuum hose to the Map sensor was dried out and leaking causing idle issues, and the injectors had seen better days. So the Mass Air conversion, larger injectors and throttle body was making sense right?
The conversion went smoothly and the car runs like new. It's insanely responsive compared to before. I love driving the car again. Besides the basic mass air conversion, upgrades include a polished 70mm throttle body and EGR spacer from Accufab, 24# injectors, and 73mm C&L Mass Air Meter housing. To make the ram tube work with the stock air box I only had to trim off about .75" to make it mate up nicely. I'm ordering silicone couplers and new clamps today from Hose Technologies. Please disregard the duct tape around the mass air housing and air box....we finished this up late Sunday night LOL! I could find 3" and smaller silicone hoses all day long but I needed a 3.5" size. Now I'd have put a K&N conical filter on but with the ram air hood it would be right by the opening and I wanted to be careful as not to suck any water into the engine if it rained hard. I want to make the ram tube work with the stock air box because I am ordering the under hood ducting kit from Cervinis to go with the ram air hood I have from them on the car right now. Updated photos and info available soon.



I love new parts - check out the size difference!


Getting more aquainted with the GT...


-John
 

87foxstang

Member
May 10, 2007
0
0
16
Cromwell, CT
Apr 28, 2009
#2
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #2
Awesome Makes me want to do that now. So the respoince is alot better than the SD huh
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Apr 28, 2009
#3
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #3
very clean , good job
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Apr 28, 2009
#4
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #4
Purty throttle body. BTW, did you open up the intake behind the egr spacer to match the 70 mm setup?
87stang, I was very happy with my mass air conversion too. I did the conversion by using an 89 harness and an a9p. Hardest part was wrestling out the old harness and getting the new one in. I believe it was JKRichker who compared it to wrestling an anaconda. Something that is funny now, but not that night. Second hardest part was finding out that a wire in the connector under the mass air sensor had to be moved over one pin because I put an auto harness and computer in a stick car.
 
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
Apr 28, 2009
#5
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #5
Ya know I didn't mess with the intake opening because I was doing the conversion this weekend and I was sick as a dog. After pulling up part of my carpet and splicing wires, soldering, modifying the air intake tube and not finding ANYBODY that sells silicone molded couplers I had to stop somewhere. Besides, I will probably be changing out the intake and heads soon anyways. Man, I was supposed to leave this one stock!
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Apr 28, 2009
#6
  • Apr 28, 2009
  • #6
JohnnyGMachine said:
Besides, I will probably be changing out the intake and heads soon anyways. Man, I was supposed to leave this one stock!
Click to expand...

LOL. My wife originally bought into that too. But now she knows there is a shortblock being rebuilt, twisted wedge heads with HS TF specific rockers, gt40 intake, 284hr cam, and a s trim with an 8 rib pully kit going in to fix my "oil pressure problem" She does, however, know that it won't make a huge difference in the way the car drives or the gas mileage it gets. "This is all parts I had lying around. It would cost me more to do it stock"
 
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
May 12, 2009
#7
  • May 12, 2009
  • #7
Just a few new pics of the car and the completed conversion. Car runs REAL good, no issues at all other than I can't keep my foot out of it!!! Love the HoseTechniques couplers and T-bolt clamps. Also took the car out for some at speed pics.



Man with new shiny parts under the hood it really makes me want to redo the motor!


 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 12, 2009
#8
  • May 12, 2009
  • #8
That's a good lookin car. I don't even like those hoods but it looks great on that car.


I'm curious though, why don't more people run speed density with Megasquirt? Is it the price or what? It's all the rage with the Merkur 2.3T guys.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 12, 2009
#9
  • May 12, 2009
  • #9
Man, that car looks good. You must know somebody who can take great pictures!

When do we get to see the write-up?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,170
17,870
224
Massachusetts
May 12, 2009
#10
  • May 12, 2009
  • #10
JohnnyGMachine said:
The throttle body was wore out, the vacuum hose to the Map sensor was dried out and leaking causing idle issues, and the injectors had seen better days. So the Mass Air conversion, larger injectors and throttle body was making sense right?
Click to expand...

Actually if the car is stock and wouldn't be seeing any mods, you should have left it SD. It would be faster


Seriously.






But car looks awesome!
 
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
May 12, 2009
#11
  • May 12, 2009
  • #11
Well that's the idea of doing the MAF conversion - I can't leave stuff stock. I got a spare set of aluminum GT40X heads I was gonna sell but I think I'm going to have a little work done to them, convert 'em to stud mount and bolt 'em up to a fresh 306 shortblock and stuff it in this car. I'll just go with a mild cam to keep it streetable and pass emissions. I really like the BBK SSI Intake so I may go with that unless I find a really nice GT40 Intake - the one with the tubular looking runners. Can't do all that with the speed density. What makes it worse is I have a buddy who is a dealer for Vortech and would probably hook me up with a new kit at his pricing. How could I say no to that?
Before I did the conversion I really thought about it. I just like the fact that if I want to modify it I can and it's not a problem I can just do it now.

I did document the whole swap with many photos along each step, wrote everything up in a lot of detail. Info to be available soon.

Thanks for the compliments guys - John
 

RARE NOTCH

Member
Nov 3, 2007
73
0
6
Ohio
May 12, 2009
#12
  • May 12, 2009
  • #12
Nice. i just did mine with the ford racing kit. it was so easy took 10 minutes to install.
 
J

jstanger89

New Member
May 27, 2004
13
0
0
NE PA
May 12, 2009
#13
  • May 12, 2009
  • #13
nice job

under hood looks very clean. i have the cervini ram air setup on mine. one bit of advice. get some good tape, the stuff they supplied sucks a**. i've retaped 3 times. but removing soon for the paxton.
 

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
May 12, 2009
#14
  • May 12, 2009
  • #14
JohnnyGMachine said:
Well that's the idea of doing the MAF conversion - I can't leave stuff stock. I got a spare set of aluminum GT40X heads I was gonna sell but I think I'm going to have a little work done to them, convert 'em to stud mount and bolt 'em up to a fresh 306 shortblock and stuff it in this car. I'll just go with a mild cam to keep it streetable and pass emissions. I really like the BBK SSI Intake so I may go with that unless I find a really nice GT40 Intake - the one with the tubular looking runners. Can't do all that with the speed density. What makes it worse is I have a buddy who is a dealer for Vortech and would probably hook me up with a new kit at his pricing. How could I say no to that?
Before I did the conversion I really thought about it. I just like the fact that if I want to modify it I can and it's not a problem I can just do it now.

I did document the whole swap with many photos along each step, wrote everything up in a lot of detail. Info to be available soon.

Thanks for the compliments guys - John
Click to expand...

I'll be looking for that write-up with pics. I will be converting my 88 at some point...hopefully soon.
 
J

JohnnyGMachine

Member
Jun 19, 2004
123
5
19
Easton, Pa
May 13, 2009
#15
  • May 13, 2009
  • #15
RARE NOTCH said:
Nice. i just did mine with the ford racing kit. it was so easy took 10 minutes to install.
Click to expand...


10 MINUTES???? Are you saying you installed a complete MAF conversion in 10 minutes? Am I missing something here? Just getting the kick panel off, all the crap around it off, the EEC out and the wire lock out takes about 10 minutes. Did you only wire in the 4 wires from the MAF unit or did you do the other 3 wires so you won't pull codes? Gotta take the driver seat out just to get to one of the relays to splice into. Tell me you soldered and didn't use butt connectors!
 

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
May 13, 2009
#16
  • May 13, 2009
  • #16
Mustang5L5 said:
Actually if the car is stock and wouldn't be seeing any mods, you should have left it SD. It would be faster


Seriously.






But car looks awesome!
Click to expand...

Whew! I didn't want to be the only one who said it! Awesome car, but if the SD setup were repaired and working properly, well, the throttle response would be just as, if not, better. Having owned a brand new 88 and a brand new 90, my 88 woulda ripped my 90 apart all week long and twice on Sunday. MAF for modifications only, mostly stock motor older cars should be Speed Density. Still, thats one sweet GT!
 

50sleeper

Founding Member
Mar 4, 2001
110
0
16
May 13, 2009
#17
  • May 13, 2009
  • #17
Fine

To the naysayers....all I can say is every car is different....

I had a very similar experience on my 87, throttle response sucked with speed density and improved greatly after a mass air conversion even with the POS stock MAF.

Glad it worked out for you too.
 

1987stangman

Member
Jul 12, 2006
684
24
19
May 13, 2009
#18
  • May 13, 2009
  • #18
Strippt88 said:
Whew! I didn't want to be the only one who said it! Awesome car, but if the SD setup were repaired and working properly, well, the throttle response would be just as, if not, better. Having owned a brand new 88 and a brand new 90, my 88 woulda ripped my 90 apart all week long and twice on Sunday. MAF for modifications only, mostly stock motor older cars should be Speed Density. Still, thats one sweet GT!
Click to expand...

Yep, I just sold all the mass air stuff I collected to do the swap after my rebuild and ported heads but after doing some reading on here I decided to leave it SD!
 

RARE NOTCH

Member
Nov 3, 2007
73
0
6
Ohio
May 13, 2009
#19
  • May 13, 2009
  • #19
JohnnyGMachine said:
10 MINUTES???? Are you saying you installed a complete MAF conversion in 10 minutes? Am I missing something here? Just getting the kick panel off, all the crap around it off, the EEC out and the wire lock out takes about 10 minutes. Did you only wire in the 4 wires from the MAF unit or did you do the other 3 wires so you won't pull codes? Gotta take the driver seat out just to get to one of the relays to splice into. Tell me you soldered and didn't use butt connectors!
Click to expand...

Ok 15minutes. the ford racing kit had a computer adapter and maf harness that pluged into the adapter. And you put the adapter on the computer and pluged in the factory harness in the adapter and the maf harness into the adapter and i was done. the car runs awesome no codes at all since doing the h/c/i and mass air conversion. The ford racing kit is the way to go if you can find one.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
May 14, 2009
#20
  • May 14, 2009
  • #20
Mustang5L5 said:
Actually if the car is stock and wouldn't be seeing any mods, you should have left it SD. It would be faster
Click to expand...

Strippt88 said:
Whew! I didn't want to be the only one who said it! Awesome car, but if the SD setup were repaired and working properly, well, the throttle response would be just as, if not, better. Having owned a brand new 88 and a brand new 90, my 88 woulda ripped my 90 apart all week long and twice on Sunday. MAF for modifications only, mostly stock motor older cars should be Speed Density. Still, thats one sweet GT!
Click to expand...

Yup. A lot of people say the difference is very minimal. But if everything is in good shape and it's tuned right, SD cars run really, really strong.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
719
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
940
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
Engine Crankcase vent tube “relocation”?
  • Mcmahst
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
573
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?