• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

No mustang but a ford...whatcha think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMOKEDYA
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Oct 30, 2010
#1
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #1
Looking at a clean 89 SHO anyone know anything about them?Any good?peace










john
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Oct 30, 2010
#2
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #2
i wouldnt buy one, every one i see is driven by a younger person that beats it to death.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Oct 30, 2010
#3
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #3
oh and, forgot this one important factor.... its a duckin taurus
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,257
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Oct 30, 2010
#4
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #4
90lxcoupe said:
i wouldnt buy one, every one i see is driven by a younger person that beats it to death.
Click to expand...


And mustangs aren't?
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Oct 30, 2010
#5
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #5
SHO
 

50foxbody

Member
Jan 4, 2009
218
0
16
Oct 30, 2010
#6
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #6
heard they are good DD's thats the only thing i know about them. id buy one for that reason. IDK if that helps
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,257
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Oct 30, 2010
#7
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #7
Guy at work owns a clean white '92. Sharp car for a taurus
 

BlackGT89

Member
Dec 16, 2002
774
8
18
Huntsville, AL
Oct 30, 2010
#8
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #8
We had a 95 SHO ATX. These were great cars in their day and were wonderful cars for gobbling up mass quantities of asphalt on the highway ! I assume the one you are looking at is a manual transaxle. One of the most popular mods for that year was to convert the shifter cable over to a rod shifter system. Just about all of the transaxles (manual and auto) are known to be weak, so expect some problems there unless it has been beefed up. They like to eat starters and alternators and both are rare and very expensive. Also check for what was called crank cancer. The crank bolt can work it's way loose and would wobble out the keyway, then it slowly dies an agonizing death. The worse thing about this car was just working on front wheel drive with a huge engine and very little space. The manual cars need to have the valves adjusted every 60K miles. The ATX cars were supposed to be good for 100K miles between adjustments. Doing this is a bit tedious and you have to rent an expensive kit that comes with an assortment of shims. You also need a special tool that compresses the bucket and allows the shims to be removed/examined/replaced. The timing belts were supposed to be good for 100K as well, but when you replaced the belt you were also oblidged to replace the water pump, the exhaust cam seals, the intake cam seals, the crank seal, the crank position sensor, the cam sensor, plugs and wires, etc. since they were all on the front of the engine. And you have to worry about the cam chains wearing and the chain tensioners needing replacement. After I did this the last time I realized the parts were unobtainium and decided it was time to let it go. If you really love to work on cars and chase down parts then I would say go for it ! Having said all of this, I would still have to say it was one of the most enjoyable cars I ever had.

Check out these SHO websites:

SHOtimes FAQ :: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about the Ford Taurus SHO from the SHOTIMES mailing list.

SHOForum.com
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Oct 30, 2010
#9
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #9
They are very delicate and cost a mint to work on. I have a friend that has had several. He buys it, drives it until the inevitable major engine or transmission work is needed, dumps it and buys another. I think he's on his 4th one now.
 

foxforce33

New Member
Mar 25, 2010
82
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 31, 2010
#10
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #10
The early 3.0L Yamaha motors are great-way ahead of their time--as said above, the transaxle and cable linkages are the weak point of the drivetrain: basically too much power for the front-drive set up. Longevity wise, I'm not sure how well these cars do. There are definitely not many left on the road, and the ones I see at shows are beat to $hit many a time. See BlackGT89's post--he has some good info-sounds like maintenance is an issue.

The later V8/auto cars were not nearly as quick as the six cyl 5-spd cars, they were more of a touring car.

As a side note, my Dad had a brand new '90 back in the day and it was the perfect sleeper.
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Oct 31, 2010
#11
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #11
i feel driving a taurus would have me trying to explain to everyone that i had a mustang at home
 
R

RatStang

New Member
Feb 11, 2010
544
0
0
Oct 31, 2010
#12
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #12
pics
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Oct 31, 2010
#13
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #13
S&B said:
i feel driving a taurus would have me trying to explain to everyone that i had a mustang at home
Click to expand...

But i do! And better yet.....it's a turbostang! peace






john
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Oct 31, 2010
#14
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #14
It will be my new DD but from the sounds of it it's something i dont want.The cost maintinace and so forth.Screw that!peace











john
 
R

rwood126

Member
Feb 20, 2009
161
3
16
mCdONOUGH, GA.
Oct 31, 2010
#15
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #15
Good luck finding parts !!
 

BlackGT89

Member
Dec 16, 2002
774
8
18
Huntsville, AL
Oct 31, 2010
#16
  • Oct 31, 2010
  • #16
SMOKEDYA said:
It will be my new DD but from the sounds of it it's something i dont want.The cost maintinace and so forth.Screw that!peace











john
Click to expand...

Well, I hope I didn't scare you off too quickly.

But I've been there and done that. If you drove it you might actually get the bug for one ! They have become a cult car of sorts, and if you look on YouTube, there are some monster SHO's out there ! But I don't know how they get the power to the ground without constantly breaking something.

YouTube - Turbo SHO takes on several worthy challengers
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,027
1,618
194
NJ
Nov 1, 2010
#17
  • Nov 1, 2010
  • #17
Don't even consider one.
We had 2 over the years.
Yes they are fun daily drivers, ride decent seat 4 and have some quickness.

BUT, when things go wrong, they go real wrong and are expensive as hell to fix.

Most have been beat on, which as said above, so are mustangs, but it's totally different to beat the crap out of a FWD car than a RWD car. A mustang is easy and cheap to fix, the SHO is not.
 
8

87lc2

Member
Oct 16, 2005
214
0
17
Nov 1, 2010
#18
  • Nov 1, 2010
  • #18
If you want a nice FWD daily driver with decent power, get a 98-04 Regal GS. I have a 99 and i absolutely love that car. I put about 400-500 miles on it a week and have never had a problem (has 105k now, bought it with 40k). That Supercharged 3.8 is bulletproof, and it gets 28 mpg highway, cant beat that.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Nov 1, 2010
#19
  • Nov 1, 2010
  • #19
Mustang5L5 said:
And mustangs aren't?
Click to expand...

Some are beat, but its still not a taurus, and a mustang could take a whoopin alot better than that SHO
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Nov 1, 2010
#20
  • Nov 1, 2010
  • #20
I had a 91 SHO Plus and I loved it. Super comfortable. It was pretty reliable until I started beating on it and broke three clutches. The differentials are very weak. If you just drive it normally and dont bang gears (which is tough) it will last forever. The intake noise on them is addicting! The engines are rock solid as long as you keep up on the maintenence. If you do get it, invest the money into a magnaflow high flow y pipe. Felt a HUGE improvement from that. Mine had 180000 on it an went 15.0 in the quarter. I also averaged 18 mpg with my lead foot.
Tell me this aint a bad ass looking car. I love the first gens and the 89's are apparently the fastest/lightest. But they do have a hideous dash.








 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
1994 Mustang GT 5.0 L Convertible
  • 94ns95
  • Jun 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2026
94ns95
9
L
For Sale 2003 White Ford Mustang Convertible For Sale $7,000
  • LemonStealingHorse
  • May 6, 2026
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
125
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 6, 2026
LemonStealingHorse
L
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
953
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
W
2.3l cooling fan questions
  • waxman
  • Jun 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
82
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
213
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?