• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Not enough HP for high stall converter??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 96Redvert
  • Start date Start date Jun 13, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
9

96Redvert

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
2
0
0
Jun 13, 2005
#1
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #1
I have 96 mustang gt and i'm in the process of having the transmission rebuilt. So i figured i'd get a high stall convert along with the J mod. The guy rebuilding my transmission called me and says my mustang doesn't have enough horse power for a 2800 or 3000 RPM stall converter. Nothing i have found online says horse power is the main factor just when you reach your power band. am i wrong? I think he is BS'ing me but i want to make sure before i tell him to put it in any way. My mods are PI intake manifold, K&N intake, Magnaflow cat-back, and the J mod(on the way).

Thanks

-john
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jun 13, 2005
#2
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #2
All I can say is while you have your tranny apart you gotta get an upgraded converter in there... Did he have a recommendation of one that he thought WOULD work???
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jun 13, 2005
#3
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #3
if your 96 GT is close to stock, the guy is probably right. to get the best performance out of a torque converter, it needs to be the proper stall for your application. you'd need to talk to someone who specializes in it to find out what stall is right for you.
 
9

96Redvert

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
2
0
0
Jun 13, 2005
#4
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #4
He only wanted to put a stock one in. I may compromise and get something just a little higher then stock.
 
S

slow96mustang

New Member
May 20, 2005
146
0
0
romulus mi
Jun 13, 2005
#5
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #5
if your motors stock a high stall will hurt you. hes right, you dont have to power to turn one that high. i wouldnt go with a stock convertor either. i would get one with around 2-300 more rpms then stock, i think you'll like it.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jun 13, 2005
#6
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #6
A good 3000 Stall TC will not hurt you, a stock GT TC is 2400 - 2700 RPM to begin with. I think you could go higher than that if you wanted to though.
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Jun 13, 2005
#7
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #7
TGJ said:
A good 3000 Stall TC will not hurt you, a stock GT TC is 2400 - 2700 RPM to begin with. I think you could go higher than that if you wanted to though.
Click to expand...
Im sorry but a stock stall for a 99-04 GT is 1700-1800 tops...and thats on tccoa.com's web site and is a 13" unit. MY is a 9.5" set up between 3000-3200rpm. If stock was 2700 stall I would leave it at that!
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jun 13, 2005
#8
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #8
big T said:
Im sorry but a stock stall for a 99-04 GT is 1700-1800 tops...and thats on tccoa.com's web site and is a 13" unit. MY is a 9.5" set up between 3000-3200rpm. If stock was 2700 stall I would leave it at that!
Click to expand...


BS about your crap from the TCCOA,

Here is the thread on TCCOA:

It is 2300 - 2700.

http://forums.tccoa.com/showthread.php?t=44751
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jun 13, 2005
#9
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #9
Also to note so there is no confusion.

The 93 - 98 Mark VIII TC is the same as the 96+ Mustang GT TC. There is no difference between a 96 GT TC and a 98 GT TC, I am not going to look for the threads on TCCOA to verify that info.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Jun 14, 2005
#10
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #10
stock stall on a 99+ GT auto is DEFINETLY not 2400-2700 rpms.
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Jun 14, 2005
#11
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #11
TGJ said:
BS about your crap from the TCCOA,

Here is the thread on TCCOA:

It is 2300 - 2700.

http://forums.tccoa.com/showthread.php?t=44751
Click to expand...
Maybe for tbirds but not for 99-04 auto gts cause i could not foot brake stall (stock)it pass 1500 w/o the tires breaking loose and now i can hold it to about 2300 or so and it flashes about 3000-3200.
 
0

01SN8K

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
135
0
0
Jun 14, 2005
#12
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #12
the stock converter is tight maybe no more than 1800-2000. the transmission shop may be right. i have seen guys run 2400 stall and be very satisfied. the only way to find out is to call and talk to torque converter manufactures and get suggestions. a 24-2800 to me in my opinion is the way to go
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 14, 2005
#13
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #13
TGJ said:
BS about your crap from the TCCOA,

Here is the thread on TCCOA:

It is 2300 - 2700.

http://forums.tccoa.com/showthread.php?t=44751
Click to expand...
not saying your wrong but that thread has lots of info in it including this:

Jonny Langton said:
Stock 3.8L Tbird convertors are 1880-2210,4.6L's are 2012-2375.
JL
Click to expand...

Is a Mustang different to a T Bird?
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jun 14, 2005
#14
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #14
The TBird used a 12" TC, the mustang used a 11 and 1/4" TC. Different TC's.

This info here.

Application..............minimum stall speed....max stall speed

'98-up Mustang GT...2324...2737
'98-up Crown Vic....2024...2440
'99-up Police or handling package Crown Vic...2319...2750
'99-up 4.6L F150...2145...2505
'03 Marauder...2555...3011


That info is taken from a FACTORY FORD DVD as rated by FORD, regardless of application. Read that thread and JL tells you where he got that info from.

I have been here awhile now and am seeing why Stangnet has a horrible name. I am glad I don't ask any tech questions here, cause I wouldn't get the right answer.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Jun 14, 2005
#15
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #15
i guess I have the wrong TC in my car b/c mine is at somewhere between 1400-1800.
 

propellerhead

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
1,541
0
0
"but what's with the but shots?"
Jun 14, 2005
#16
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #16
From what I've read, brake stalling and flash stalling will net different stall speeds.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Jun 14, 2005
#17
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #17
propellerhead said:
From what I've read, brake stalling and flash stalling will net different stall speeds.
Click to expand...

That is correct.

To get an approx estimate of your TC Stall, from a complete stop, put your car in 2nd and floor it. Do not hold the car back with brakes. Your tach will flash to your approximate stall speed.

I am not going to get into the reasons for it being approximate and not the actual value as they are quite trivial.

I know when I did that with my Stock 12" TC, my Tbird would hit 1900 RPM, when I upgraded to the GT TC, it would hit 2400 RPM and now with the 3500 TC, it is hitting about 4000. My 3500 TC was rated at 3500 - 3800 RPM.
 
S

slow96mustang

New Member
May 20, 2005
146
0
0
romulus mi
Jun 14, 2005
#18
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #18
streetstang03 said:
i guess I have the wrong TC in my car b/c mine is at somewhere between 1400-1800.
Click to expand...
and i wish my car had the power for the nice high 2400 stock stall.
 

foncarelli

Member
Jan 7, 2003
156
1
18
Jun 14, 2005
#19
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #19
I put my PI converter(2800) on when my car was stock. No problems at all. It felt like a beast.
 

autoDOM

New Member
Jun 14, 2005
4
0
0
baltimore
Jun 14, 2005
#20
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #20
your cars power has nothjing to do with it. i run a 2800 stall, multidisk lockup. i ran it with mere bolt ones. made a nice difference. now, with over 450 rwhp it stalls around 3200 with the transbrake, and is jsut meaner. you will benefit from a higher stall. if you plan on staying NA go 3500+ if you plan on boost go lower
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Holley terminator integration into CCRM
  • BrandonMP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
233
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2026
BrandonMP
CJ Pony Parts Customer Build - Dan's 1967 Mustang Convertible
  • CJPonyParts
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
207
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 18, 2025
CJPonyParts
0
Engine Multiple o2 sensor codes, car runs terrible
  • 02newedge
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
507
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
squeak93
How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
674
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
424
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?