• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

OCTANE QUESTION

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLKVERT
  • Start date Start date May 31, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

BLKVERT

New Member
Jan 19, 2004
407
0
0
SATX
May 31, 2004
#1
  • May 31, 2004
  • #1
Alright guys and gals....quick tech question for ya....me and my boss are in a slight dissagreement over this. On a '00 GT he states that it only needs 87 and would run fine.(Cus I bitched over gas prices? Whiel i disagree and only run 93, which i have heard stops the car from knocking and pinging?
Please someone help settle this so I can rub it in his face.
 

Aaron 4.6

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2001
2,695
0
0
Georgia
May 31, 2004
#2
  • May 31, 2004
  • #2
You lose. You only need 87. Ford cars requiring higher octanes will say "Premium Fuel Required' instead of 'Unleaded Fuel Only' on the dash.

Higher octane will help stop pinging, but your car should be OK on 87.
 

BLKVERT

New Member
Jan 19, 2004
407
0
0
SATX
May 31, 2004
#3
  • May 31, 2004
  • #3
Well dammit...SOB...oh well...guess I am fired. Is there any negative impact that I am doing to the motor..as I have always used 93???
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
May 31, 2004
#4
  • May 31, 2004
  • #4
You'll see lower power the higher octane you use, assuming you don't need the higher octane fuel. I don't think you've done anything damaging really, higher octane fuel is harder to ignite though.
 

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
May 31, 2004
#5
  • May 31, 2004
  • #5
I will second the lower power thing. I have been running 91 and 93 in my car on and off since I installed a timing adjuster, but since I only set the timing to 13* I have found that the car runs a lot better on 89 octane than on the higher stuff. It all depends on ignition timing (and of course boost in non N/A cars) It seems like people running 15-16* of timing need the 91-93 octane. Stock the cars ignition timing is set at 10* so 87 should be enough. That is not to say the car wont ping every once in a while (a little pinging is normal under certain circumstances) But, I have had several mechanics drive my car with the 13* and 89 and they say it runs and sounds fine. And, I can definately feel a power difference when I run the lower octane in the car. If the car doesnt need the higher octane you are better off not using it in my opinion. I will add though that under certain circumstances I will run Premium in my car to be on the safe side (because of the timing adjuster) like if the weather is really hot for a long period of time and I actually hear some pinging.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
May 31, 2004
#6
  • May 31, 2004
  • #6
Good thread guys - exactly right. Octane is to prevent pre-ignition. The more octane you have the less volatile the fuel is and less power is the result. So it's a balance of how much timing advance, compression, etc you have as to what gas you need to run.
 
L

LocoStrange

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
13
0
0
May 31, 2004
#7
  • May 31, 2004
  • #7
Unless you got like a BIG supercharge or twin+ turbo.. there is no need to use 91 or even 93
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
May 31, 2004
#8
  • May 31, 2004
  • #8
LocoStrange said:
Unless you got like a BIG supercharge or twin+ turbo.. there is no need to use 91 or even 93
Click to expand...
Ummm, no, that's not correct. Increased timing advance (or increased compression) requires additional octane to prevent pre-ignition (detonation). I have to run 91+ because of increased timing advance via my SCT chip tune.
 

BLKVERT

New Member
Jan 19, 2004
407
0
0
SATX
May 31, 2004
#9
  • May 31, 2004
  • #9
So then stock timing is 10*...and because of this there is no need to run 91 or 93..and I will be fine to run 87. And what about the old theory that the higher octane the gas the more it cleans out the injectors so there will be no need later on to have injector cleaner dropped into the tank????
 

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
May 31, 2004
#10
  • May 31, 2004
  • #10
BLKVERT said:
So then stock timing is 10*...and because of this there is no need to run 91 or 93..and I will be fine to run 87. And what about the old theory that the higher octane the gas the more it cleans out the injectors so there will be no need later on to have injector cleaner dropped into the tank????
Click to expand...

As far as I know all fuel grades have detergents in them that are designed to keep injectors and valves clean. I could be wrong though.
 

Go HoTO!

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
602
0
0
Mountaintop, PA
May 31, 2004
#11
  • May 31, 2004
  • #11
twogt and Jesus nailed it! Dam, how can a guy be wrong named Jesus? Years ago, the lower grades had less detergants in them, hence the reason why you thought that. Now, they are all about the same.

One more thing, higher octane fuel burns slower. This is why you advance the timing.

Also, blowers run at higher intake temperatures due to the air being compressed. This is another reason why they need high octane, right? I do know that higher ambient temps will tend to cause pre-ignition (pinging) too.
 

Jesus

Banned
May 13, 2003
267
0
0
Woodland Hills, CA
May 31, 2004
#12
  • May 31, 2004
  • #12
Tis true, the thing about higher ambient tempperatures causing detonation. This is one of the reasons a modern car can run 10:1 compression ration on 87 octane gas. Back in the sixties all the cars had comp ratios of at least 10:1, but they needed 102-104 octane fuel; the reason: almost all of those cars had iron heads instead of the more modern aluminum heads. Iron heads retained more heat, hence causing preignition. Other reasons modern cars can run higher comp. ratios are: electronic Fuel injection, and modern roller or overhead valvetrains.
 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
May 31, 2004
#13
  • May 31, 2004
  • #13
Good accurate information here, don't waste your money on better gas if it is not needed.
 

GoBabyVroommm

Active Member
Mar 22, 2003
1,156
0
36
Chicago, For Realss???!!!
May 31, 2004
#14
  • May 31, 2004
  • #14
In a 4v you should put nothing less then 91. Your good with 87 in your car. Damn your lucky.
 
G

GregGTStang

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
240
0
0
May 31, 2004
#15
  • May 31, 2004
  • #15
So, if your car is 100% stock, run 87 or the 89????
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
May 31, 2004
#16
  • May 31, 2004
  • #16
run the 87 unless you ping then run 89. If you still ping with 89 I'd take it to the dealer and raise some hell.
 

Mr GT 02

New Member
Apr 8, 2004
548
0
0
Peabody, MA
Jun 1, 2004
#17
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #17
I run diesel in my car..is that safe?
 

BLKVERT

New Member
Jan 19, 2004
407
0
0
SATX
Jun 1, 2004
#18
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #18
Mr GT 02 said:
I run diesel in my car..is that safe?
Click to expand...


Of course it is.


Thanks guys for the informative info. Guess I will start saving some $$ and start using 87 or 89.
 

GoldnGT

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
427
0
0
Birmingham, AL
Jun 1, 2004
#19
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #19
Hmm.. running nitrous i think i'll stick with the 93 octane

Mike
 
J

Joel's98GT

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
368
0
0
central OH
Jun 1, 2004
#20
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #20
GoldnGT said:
Hmm.. running nitrous i think i'll stick with the 93 octane

Mike
Click to expand...


good choice.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Power door lock motor Question
  • NYFox
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
276
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2026
NYFox
N
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
4.6 question for those in the know....
  • LILCBRA
  • Aug 30, 2024
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 4, 2024
Adieu
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
526
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?