• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Oil burning 5.0, can it be diagnosed without tearing bottom end down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstang01
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Nov 4, 2009
#21
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #21
Adam95GT said:
... but like i said to be safe id just rering and rebearing the bottom end.
Click to expand...

Agree. I think that would be the best thing to do and then you can be sure that the engine won't burn oil when you install new heads. If you only do the heads, you'll still have that element of doubt and if the engine does still burn oil, you're gonna have to tear it down again.
Do it once and do it right.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 4, 2009
#22
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #22
Bullitt95 said:
Do it once and do it right.
Click to expand...

Disagree. If he wants a mild stroker in the future....he's not doing it once. So if he doesnt want the trouble of ringing the pistons now....especially if he plans on doing a rotating assembly later.....

i say do the h/c/i and see what happens
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Nov 4, 2009
#23
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #23
nmcgrawj said:
Disagree. If he wants a mild stroker in the future....he's not doing it once. So if he doesnt want the trouble of ringing the pistons now....especially if he plans on doing a rotating assembly later.....

i say do the h/c/i and see what happens
Click to expand...

Believe me, I'd go all out if I could afford to do both, but I simply can't in one season. The "right" way to do it would be to refresh the bottom end and do an H/C/I, thus removing all doubt.

The H/C/I, supporting mods, and tuning already give me a nice fat bill, I can't imagine adding a rotating assembly, block work, engine lift rental, etc. to that in one season.

Who knows, I may be happy with 290 to 310 rwhp, and if my oil problem gets resolved there will be no need for the expense of a stroker until my rings go south (which may take another 80,000 miles)

If my problem clearly pointed to rings, I'd have no choice, but I'm thinking my issue is 80% chance heads, 20% chance rings. My compression was like... 150, 151, 150, 152, 153, 151, 152, 153 or something like that. I get a puff on hard acceleration, and a puff on downshifting.

http://www.sn95mustangs.com/index.php?page=articles&op=readArticle&id=74&title=94-Mustang-Compression-Specs said:
Note – Ford does not provide a cranking pressure specification, only an acceptable range

Cylinder compression pressure should range between 135 psi (being lowest maximum pressure), and 250 psi (being highest maximum pressure), at an engine cranking speed of 180 RPM minimum. Compression pressure in each cylinder should fall within specified compression range with the lowest cylinder’s reading being at least 75% of the highest cylinder’s reading.
Click to expand...
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 4, 2009
#24
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #24
wait huh?

I was responding to bullit95 who said just to do the rings now to "do it right and do it once". Not telling u to do it all right now. I know u planned on stroking it later....so would be doing it twice, when u dont even really know if u have to do it twice.

Thats why i said just do a h/c/i now and see what happens.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Nov 4, 2009
#25
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #25
Meant to quote bullitt95 there, my bad. I know you've got the same idea as me
 
T

tderrick

Member
Oct 27, 2004
312
0
17
Nov 4, 2009
#26
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #26
70 k miles... I would say the bottom end is fine... the smoke symptoms sound like top end to me. Probably lack of use rot on stem seals.

I vote h/c/i now ... you'll be good for at least another 100 k



I have 210k miles.... no smoke. very little oil loss. most loss coming from rear main leak..
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Nov 5, 2009
#27
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #27
dstang01 said:
Meant to quote bullitt95 there, my bad. I know you've got the same idea as me
Click to expand...

The compression numbers look good across the board so I also think there's unlikely to be a problem with the rings (unless you're very unlucky). You might be able to tell if a valve stem oil seal has gone on the no.3 cylinder just by pulling the valve cover and inspecting it. Hopefully the H/C/I swap will be all you need to do to kill two birds with one stone as you mentioned earlier.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
316
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
309
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
L
Engine Normal Leakdown Results (unstarted in nearly 2 years)
  • Lube
  • May 26, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2024
Blackhawkxx
Engine No start issue AGAIN!
  • ucnhtmenow1
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
957
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2024
89ripper
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?