• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

OK stinger

  • Thread starter Thread starter manny
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2006
M

manny

Founding Member
Dec 5, 2001
590
6
16
TAMPA FL
Jan 8, 2006
#1
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #1
ok stinger i've been reading and reading all about the svo's and the turboing of the fox body mustangs and also been reading your entire web site and you have convinced me to build up a turbo charged 2.3 fox mustang.i will be selling my mustangII which has a very nice 302 in her that really runs good. if i could build a nice 2.3 turbo fox that would even run close to the II i would be really happy. just to prove the point i just bought a turbo 2.3 turbo motor from ebay for $41.00 dollars, i'm also watching a 1993 2.3 liter LX mustang. both are close to my home so i guess the quest to build a mild looking killer turbo'ed fox mustang begins . looks like i'll be reading your site that much closer. thanks in advance for all of the questions that might pop up
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jan 8, 2006
#2
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #2
Good to see I've made another "conversion" I'm sure it will be fun.

Let me know if you have any questions that aren't covered on my site...
 
L

lit_mike_2001

New Member
Jan 25, 2003
163
1
0
Ada, OK
Jan 11, 2006
#3
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #3
for goodness sake, keep the 302 powered car put the same amount of money as you put in your 2.3 powered one, and in the end tell me which ones faster.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jan 11, 2006
#4
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #4
Oh man...here we go again
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jan 11, 2006
#5
  • Jan 11, 2006
  • #5
wait till im done with my 2.3.......302 production blocks are weak...if u want something to take boost and abuse a 2.3 is where it is at....watch what im saying when you take it apart. turboford also has tons of info and stinger has just about all of the stuff you need to build a 2.3 worth a d@mn. just remeber if you cut corners and be cheap things wont work out....
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Jan 12, 2006
#6
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #6
lit_mike_2001 said:
for goodness sake, keep the 302 powered car put the same amount of money as you put in your 2.3 powered one, and in the end tell me which ones faster.
Click to expand...


41$ ? Jenious, i bet he could fill his tank with that
 

towbar

Member
Dec 19, 2004
21
10
14
Akron, OH
Jan 13, 2006
#7
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #7
I think you'll like the 2.3t a lot better. I finished my swap last year and I love to drive my 2.3 more than my 5.0.

 
M

manny

Founding Member
Dec 5, 2001
590
6
16
TAMPA FL
Jan 13, 2006
#8
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #8
needless to say that the motor will need to be rebuilt but it does come with the turbo,exhaust manifold and the complete long block. it even has the bell houseing and clutch assy.the type of the intake it has is the 4 in a row type.do you think this would work,put the turbo pistons in a 91-93 car, add the turbo and intercooler.would this work?
 
M

manny

Founding Member
Dec 5, 2001
590
6
16
TAMPA FL
Jan 15, 2006
#9
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #9
ok now,got the motor home and its sitting on the stand. looks like the motor came out of a 1984 ford turbo mustang. it has only one tube that goes to the actuater(witch is missing). turbo turns freely so does motor. i plan on rebuilding it from top to bottom before i install it into the car.stinger my question is should i get the ecu and harness from a TC in order to do the swap into a 87-90 mustang? i was reading your site and you used a TC motor to begin with and mine looks just a little different. thanks in advance
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jan 15, 2006
#10
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #10
that is what was used for mine...a t/c wire harness and a computer from a auto T/C becuase it has more aggressive timing tables.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jan 15, 2006
#11
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #11
You'll want to get an 87-88 turbo coupe ecu. You'll also want a large air meter and 35lb injectors (which an 84 Mustang motor won't have).

You'll also need about 12" of air meter wires/plug.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
800
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
H
Drivetrain 4R70W clutch friction/metals/piston set up questions for transmission guru
  • Hizdudeness
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
983
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2024
slow84lx
S
Progress Thread Nicholase "lights out" build-
  • nicholase
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 26 27 28
Replies
552
Views
40K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Monday at 12:34 PM
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?